Political attack by a Liberal state politician ... so what, that's not evidence.
FACT: Police have not laid any charges yet.
thats true stig but i dont think it will be long.. even tho the labor power mongers are trying there utmost for that not to happen, i guess with all the information they have it will not make a difference what lengths the labor scaremongers go to. He will certainly have his day in court.
southee you and the other one should let the police do their job, they're investigating to see IF there is anything to warrant charging the guy.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
Gozu wrote:southee you and the other one should let the police do their job, they're investigating to see IF there is anything to warrant charging the guy.
Yes I am ....just putting up the evidence that is already available to the public .... Nothing wrong with that is there ?
Gozu wrote:southee you and the other one should let the police do their job, they're investigating to see IF there is anything to warrant charging the guy.
Yes I am ....just putting up the evidence that is already available to the public .... Nothing wrong with that is there ?
Just implying you and the police might have different definitions of what might be called "evidence".
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
Gozu wrote:southee you and the other one should let the police do their job, they're investigating to see IF there is anything to warrant charging the guy.
Yes I am ....just putting up the evidence that is already available to the public .... Nothing wrong with that is there ?
Just implying you and the police might have different definitions of what might be called "evidence".
Doubt it in this case, however I am sure they may have different definitions as to what is proof.
This is as bad as "I did not have a sexual relationship with this woman"
And the best way for the media to allow allegations of criminal behaviour to avoid prosecution or unduly influence any potential legal proceedings is to publish so-called 'evidence'.
If there are any charges laid then the defence would have a very easy job ...
LOL, FFS, didn't say whether he is guilty or innocent ... in case you didn't notice, we have a legal system that takes care of things like this, and if he is ever charged, will be judged accordingly with the appropriate penalty.
Would you like me to write it in crayon on butcher's paper, in large letters with the obligatory grammatical and spelling mistakes, so you can understand?
i think i have seen enough to understand that he is a crook and a bad man but a typical labor thug who has also threatened women too i see in the media?!
straight talker wrote:i think i have seen enough to understand that he is a crook and a bad man but a typical labor thug who has also threatened women too i see in the media?!
He is also getting watched for his own welfare.
I do agree with straight talker....if it was a liberal MP he or she would be shot down in flames on this thread.