Rising Power wrote:Here's an idea. Howabout the opposition coach selects Port's team for them? Better take that one to the next SANFL committee meeting.
Nah, just kicking you out of the comp would be far easier.
Rising Power wrote:Here's an idea. Howabout the opposition coach selects Port's team for them? Better take that one to the next SANFL committee meeting.
CUTTERMAN wrote:How about they just **** off
Jim05 wrote:Rising Power wrote:Here's an idea. Howabout the opposition coach selects Port's team for them? Better take that one to the next SANFL committee meeting.
Nah, just kicking you out of the comp would be far easier.
CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
Rising Power wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
LOL what promise? I've been a member for 20 years and there was no 'promise'. They openly said using the Magpies as reserves was not part of the merger proposal, ie. that it would not instantly happen with the amalgamation of the administrative operations of the two clubs. The dirty work for getting the reserves up was left to the crows. Wow, deja vu...
CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
Rising Power wrote:Merger? What merger? I've always thought it was the one and the same club.
Rising Power wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
LOL what promise? I've been a member for 20 years and there was no 'promise'. They openly said using the Magpies as reserves was not part of the merger proposal, ie. that it would not instantly happen with the amalgamation of the administrative operations of the two clubs. The dirty work for getting the reserves up was left to the crows. Wow, deja vu...
RustyCage wrote:Rising Power wrote:Merger? What merger? I've always thought it was the one and the same club.
End of 2010 there was a merger between the Power and Magpies off field administration

CUTTERMAN wrote:We can neither confirm nor deny the existence of the information requested but, hypothetically, if such data were to exist, the subject matter would be classified, and could not be disclosed.
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:We can neither confirm nor deny the existence of the information requested but, hypothetically, if such data were to exist, the subject matter would be classified, and could not be disclosed.
Long winded way of saying you've got no idea.
CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:We can neither confirm nor deny the existence of the information requested but, hypothetically, if such data were to exist, the subject matter would be classified, and could not be disclosed.
Long winded way of saying you've got no idea.
Well Boobey, that was in reply to your previous post towards me. So try keep it in context if you think you can. I just have to reference the One Club proposal to be assured of my stance on things concerning this act of prostitution.
Anyway, keep the excuses coming, it's entertaining.

RustyCage wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
The one club proposal was that that particular merger wouldn't make the Magpies a reserves team. It didn't. End of story
DOC wrote:RustyCage wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Considering I never thought the PAFC would go back on the promise to Magpie members in the One Club proposal that the Magpies wouldn't become a franchise reserves team, I'll keep in mind that you shouldn't rule anything out.
The one club proposal was that that particular merger wouldn't make the Magpies a reserves team. It didn't. End of story
Rusty. Call them what you like. When the team is made up from the players not chosen at the higher or highest level, they are the reserves, b grade, magoos , frost kickers or whatever you like. South could call their second side the Ramblers, but the Ramblers remain the reserves etc.
The Magpies are the left overs from the Power and are supplemented by additional players, depending on how many are required.
The Crows have an identical scenario in essence.
Neither Port or the Crows have any place in our league.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 265 guests