AFL Round 3 - #hublyfe

[Eagles2014]

is the centre square still 45m long?

Only if it's 45m wide

cunny funt
It is 45, i just checked, so how does Sic get a 50 just inside the square to just outside it? He shouldve been having a shot from very closer to the 50m line than the centre square

It is 50 metres.

[daysofourlives]

is the centre square still 45m long?

Only if it's 45m wide

cunny funt
It is 45, i just checked, so how does Sic get a 50 just inside the square to just outside it? He shouldve been having a shot from very closer to the 50m line than the centre square

It is 50 metres.

sorry youre wrong unless its an AFL only thing. I googled it at 45m

[Senor Moto Gadili]

Centre square is 50m x 50m

[daysofourlives]

Centre square is 50m x 50m

Is it just at AFL grounds?

[daysofourlives]

AFL centre square size
Some measurements specific to the AFL are: - Centre square – each line is 45 metres in length. - Goal square width is 6.4m. - Goal square length is 9m. The goal posts for AFL matches are 15 metres high and the point posts 10 meters high. The length of the cricket pitch is 22 yards, which in metric terms is 20.12 metres.
Size and Capacity - MCG, The History
mcgthehistory.weebly.com/size-and-capacity.html


I also found some saying 50m.
I think its likely its 50m, the umpires wouldnt get it wrong
MCG is 160m long, it looks about 5m between the arcs and square

[Wedgie]

It was changed from 45m to 50m in 2004.

[Corona Man]

Get the feeling Mrs Hardwick is in trouble tonight!

[The Dark Knight]

It was changed from 45m to 50m in 2004.

Just AFL grounds obviously?

[Wedgie]

It was changed from 45m to 50m in 2004.

Just AFL grounds obviously?

Yes

[jackpot jim]

Are they going to do the BLM on one knee stance every week??

NFI but 1 week was 1 week too long

keep politics out of football FFS !!

[Corona Man]

Tiges by 4 goal.

Yeah, nah.... good call.

[daysofourlives]

Tiges by 4 goal.

Yeah, nah.... good call.

Not sure you can have a crack at him you bag us more than he does

[LMA]

Another snoozer, this comp needs to lose 4 clubs immediately.

[Spargo]

Another snoozer, this comp needs to lose 4 clubs immediately.

And those 4 are?
I was thinking maybe 8

[daysofourlives]

Another snoozer, this comp needs to lose 4 clubs immediately.

Yep North, Saints, Port and Suns, send dogs to Tassie

[The Dark Knight]

FFS Richmond, not the start to the round I was looking for tips wise. A different result from last week obviously but another real slow start by the Tigers and only the ten goals in two weeks is something we're not accustomed to from them. Hawthorn bounced back alot more convincingly than I certainly thought, I was confident Richmond would win tonight but the Hawks doing what they do best- manufacturing another win.

[LMA]

Another snoozer, this comp needs to lose 4 clubs immediately.

And those 4 are?
I was thinking maybe 8

GC, GWS are a given, plus 2 Vic clubs.

[Bum Crack]

Tiges by 4 goal.

Yeah, nah.... good call.

Not sure you can have a crack at him you bag us more than he does

Makes me a bit happier about Geelongs clinic last week.

[Corona Man]

Don’t know what you’re talking about there BC.... completely erased from my memory

[Senor Moto Gadili]

Another snoozer, this comp needs to lose 4 clubs immediately.

The only reason it was a snoozer was because Richmond were so poor. Their first loss in 12 months. Should we get rid of them? I don't see how getting rid of 4 teams will eliminate snoozers. There will always be one sided contests and some teams will always play an unattractive style. Surely the fact one team can get belted at Geelong one week and next week beat the reigning premier is good for the competition.