Booney wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i see visitors at Alberton still get screwed by the umps
Hahaha...
Free kicks
PA - 12
The other 21 - 26
its not the quantity its the quality
Booney wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i see visitors at Alberton still get screwed by the umps
Hahaha...
Free kicks
PA - 12
The other 21 - 26
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
I definitely think there is some bias there towards the genuine clubs (as there should be IMO) but I’ve noticed in the games that I have seen that the two AFL clubs aren’t fully across the last touch rule and usually give away a fair few from that. I believe those frees are counted on the stats for free kicks still but I’m sure others may knowWedgie wrote:What is the deal with the umps Booney?
I saw the Power get flogged by the umps against North too (was 10 nil Norths way at one stage).
Are the umpires handing out some "natural justice" or is there a genuine issue?
(From what I've seen it's the first option)
Jim05 wrote:I definitely think there is some bias there towards the genuine clubs (as there should be IMO) but I’ve noticed in the games that I have seen that the two AFL clubs aren’t fully across the last touch rule and usually give away a fair few from that. I believe those frees are counted on the stats for free kicks still but I’m sure others may knowWedgie wrote:What is the deal with the umps Booney?
I saw the Power get flogged by the umps against North too (was 10 nil Norths way at one stage).
Are the umpires handing out some "natural justice" or is there a genuine issue?
(From what I've seen it's the first option)
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Spargo wrote:When was maturity a rule on here?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Booney wrote:Spargo wrote:When was maturity a rule on here?
When deliberate trolling went out.
Jim05 wrote:I definitely think there is some bias there towards the genuine clubs (as there should be IMO) but I’ve noticed in the games that I have seen that the two AFL clubs aren’t fully across the last touch rule and usually give away a fair few from that. I believe those frees are counted on the stats for free kicks still but I’m sure others may knowWedgie wrote:What is the deal with the umps Booney?
I saw the Power get flogged by the umps against North too (was 10 nil Norths way at one stage).
Are the umpires handing out some "natural justice" or is there a genuine issue?
(From what I've seen it's the first option)
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I definitely think there is some bias there towards the genuine clubs (as there should be IMO) but I’ve noticed in the games that I have seen that the two AFL clubs aren’t fully across the last touch rule and usually give away a fair few from that. I believe those frees are counted on the stats for free kicks still but I’m sure others may knowWedgie wrote:What is the deal with the umps Booney?
I saw the Power get flogged by the umps against North too (was 10 nil Norths way at one stage).
Are the umpires handing out some "natural justice" or is there a genuine issue?
(From what I've seen it's the first option)
Are you, quite maturely I might add,suggesting a systematic approach by the SANFL to have the umpires, fairly in your mature view, judge the Adelaide and Port Adelaide SANFL sides more harshly to the point of let's call it, cheating?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Yes, I think they are umpired differently and no I don’t have a huge issue with that.Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I definitely think there is some bias there towards the genuine clubs (as there should be IMO) but I’ve noticed in the games that I have seen that the two AFL clubs aren’t fully across the last touch rule and usually give away a fair few from that. I believe those frees are counted on the stats for free kicks still but I’m sure others may knowWedgie wrote:What is the deal with the umps Booney?
I saw the Power get flogged by the umps against North too (was 10 nil Norths way at one stage).
Are the umpires handing out some "natural justice" or is there a genuine issue?
(From what I've seen it's the first option)
Are you, quite maturely I might add,suggesting a systematic approach by the SANFL to have the umpires, fairly in your mature view, judge the Adelaide and Port Adelaide SANFL sides more harshly to the point of let's call it, cheating?
Well the best option is for them not to be in the comp, the next best option would be to exclude them from finals and option 3 is to umpire them so that they can’t win a flag.Booney wrote:There it is. Cheers.
Jim05 wrote:Well the best option is for them not to be in the comp, the next best option would be to exclude them from finals and option 3 is to umpire them so that they can’t win a flag.Booney wrote:There it is. Cheers.
The SANFL has chosen option 3
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
Hazydog wrote:Dogs having a crack but Port’s AFL experienced players more damaging in possession. Narkle proving to be very handy at this level (and VAMOS I don’t think that’s drawing too long a bow?)
Impressed with Luca’s game, with just 25 games under his belt he has massive upside.
Hopefully we hang in there and keep it respectable but fear a last quarter blow out
.
Wedgie wrote:Fun fact of the day:
Greenland is further north, south, east and west than Iceland.
Is that better?
(Sorry if some sook wants to whinge that I'm trolling against Iceland)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 277 guests