R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

All discussions to do with the SANFL
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

Post by stampy »

the five is set, port no chance on current form
Go The Tiges!!!
Hopeful Jelly
Under 16s
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 3:41 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Been thanked: 14 times
Contact:

Re: R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

Post by Hopeful Jelly »

rocketeer wrote:
DOC wrote:Port may have been advised that the SANFL has no authority or the law is unconstitutional. The vibe.


I think the ruling was that they can't play after being an afl medical sub regardless of whether they made it onto the field or not, so in this case it was fine.

Almost ... the AFL medical sub can play in the SANFL on the same weekend if they have not been on the field. Port and Crows were unhappy with this rule as other competitions allow the sub to play regardless of whether they made it onto the field or not.

For example, if the sub plays for 10 minutes, they are not allowed to play SANFL on the same weekend, whereas in the VFL and WAFL they are allowed to play.


This rule didn't apply today though as the Magpies game was played before the Power. If we believe what was reported, Hamish Hartlett injured himself during the warm up so they had to pull Mayes out of the Magpies at half time. Just the same as someone in an SANFL league team injuring themselves during the warm up so a reserves player that's already played part of their game comes in.

Normally the AFL team would hold back an emergency in the case when the AFL game is after an SANFL game on a weekend. Today Port rolled the dice, knowing that if anything happened, they had players available that were less than 10 minutes away.
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

Post by stampy »

Jim05 wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:What does having the Powpies Crovens add to the competition?
Absolutely nothing.
It’s good seeing them get towelled up though. Hopefully further restrictions come in over the time they remain here so they become absolutely uncompetitive


they, in particular port will go crying to the sanfl AGAIN
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

Post by Wedgie »

"The SANFL Commission on Wednesday determined that a medical substitute who takes the field in an AFL game cannot play the same round at a state level, irrespective of time spent on the ground.

“While the AFL announced that the medical substitute player could play State League football the same weekend, regardless of whether they are activated or not, SANFL’s current rule does not allow this,” the SANFL confirmed in a statement.


Can't find any reference to if they play before or after, just the same weekend/round.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64108
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: R12 North v Port Saturday 1330

Post by Booney »

AFL to SANFL, no go.

SANFL to AFL, all good*.

*So far.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 260 guests