Armchair expert wrote:As much as we would all like to see Geelong go out in straight sets they will murder the pies.
This . 40+
Armchair expert wrote:As much as we would all like to see Geelong go out in straight sets they will murder the pies.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
Booney wrote:
Correct, Sydney denied them the ball and didn't allow Collingwood to play the corridor. Sydney upped their uncontested possessions by way of more kicks to mark situations denying Collingwood the ball and Sydney's pressure didn't allow Collingwood their plan to do the same, kick to uncontested mark. Collingwood some 20 odd marks under their average, they didn't get it and when they did they were under the pump.
If it's Collingwoods system that is the reason they hold in in tight games it can't be personnel when they lose. Can't have it both ways.
MatteeG wrote:Armchair expert wrote:As much as we would all like to see Geelong go out in straight sets they will murder the pies.
This . 40+
Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
Correct, Sydney denied them the ball and didn't allow Collingwood to play the corridor. Sydney upped their uncontested possessions by way of more kicks to mark situations denying Collingwood the ball and Sydney's pressure didn't allow Collingwood their plan to do the same, kick to uncontested mark. Collingwood some 20 odd marks under their average, they didn't get it and when they did they were under the pump.
If it's Collingwoods system that is the reason they hold in in tight games it can't be personnel when they lose. Can't have it both ways.
Sydney won on their small ground in front of their home crowd. It probably did Collingwood good to drop one instead of going into the finals 14 straight.
They demolished Freo in Perth, made light work of Melbourne in one outing then pinched a win when Melbourne had refound their mojo.
They didn't play many games under lights this season.
Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
Correct, Sydney denied them the ball and didn't allow Collingwood to play the corridor. Sydney upped their uncontested possessions by way of more kicks to mark situations denying Collingwood the ball and Sydney's pressure didn't allow Collingwood their plan to do the same, kick to uncontested mark. Collingwood some 20 odd marks under their average, they didn't get it and when they did they were under the pump.
If it's Collingwoods system that is the reason they hold in in tight games it can't be personnel when they lose. Can't have it both ways.
Sydney won on their small ground in front of their home crowd. It probably did Collingwood good to drop one instead of going into the finals 14 straight.
They demolished Freo in Perth, made light work of Melbourne in one outing then pinched a win when Melbourne had refound their mojo.
They didn't play many games under lights this season.
Myth busted
SCG length 155m x 136m
MCG length 160m x 141m
So from the middle to the boundary it's 2m "larger" all round.
Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
Correct, Sydney denied them the ball and didn't allow Collingwood to play the corridor. Sydney upped their uncontested possessions by way of more kicks to mark situations denying Collingwood the ball and Sydney's pressure didn't allow Collingwood their plan to do the same, kick to uncontested mark. Collingwood some 20 odd marks under their average, they didn't get it and when they did they were under the pump.
If it's Collingwoods system that is the reason they hold in in tight games it can't be personnel when they lose. Can't have it both ways.
Sydney won on their small ground in front of their home crowd. It probably did Collingwood good to drop one instead of going into the finals 14 straight.
They demolished Freo in Perth, made light work of Melbourne in one outing then pinched a win when Melbourne had refound their mojo.
They didn't play many games under lights this season.
Myth busted
SCG length 155m x 136m
MCG length 160m x 141m
So from the middle to the boundary it's 2m "larger" all round.
Lightning McQueen wrote:
There's over 3000M2 difference between the two.
Armchair expert wrote:As much as we would all like to see Geelong go out in straight sets they will murder the pies.
Jim05 wrote:Amazing coincidence how this Dusty garbage comes out on the eve of finals.
With all these muckrakers in the business and this sat idle for 5 years, Fagan must have some good sources
Jim05 wrote:Amazing coincidence how this Dusty garbage comes out on the eve of finals.
With all these muckrakers in the business and this sat idle for 5 years, Fagan must have some good sources
Jim05 wrote:Amazing coincidence how this Dusty garbage comes out on the eve of finals.
With all these muckrakers in the business and this sat idle for 5 years, Fagan must have some good sources
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Amazing coincidence how this Dusty garbage comes out on the eve of finals.
With all these muckrakers in the business and this sat idle for 5 years, Fagan must have some good sources
You think COVID was invented by Gates to put microchips in us too? F*ck me.![]()
The media want more and more from Martin then they dig this shit up, I'm glad he tells them "Thanks, but no thanks".
It just seems bizarre that it happened 5 years ago yet all the journos waiting on a story and all the cameras around these days and that is the first we have heard about it. Have the journos burnt all their sources for gossip?Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Amazing coincidence how this Dusty garbage comes out on the eve of finals.
With all these muckrakers in the business and this sat idle for 5 years, Fagan must have some good sources
You think COVID was invented by Gates to put microchips in us too? F*ck me.![]()
The media want more and more from Martin then they dig this shit up, I'm glad he tells them "Thanks, but no thanks".
MW wrote:How's old mate Scoop on twitter justifying it cause he's one of the best ever, it was ages ago and it was at a private function...and getting absolutely smashed for it on twitter. What a f..khead.
tigerpie wrote:So someone has sat on it for this long, then all of a sudden its released, tells me he's pissed someone off.
Or whoever had it is broke and needed the money.
Maybe a rival club had it and are trying to bring his price down.
Whatever the reason, great timing if you are the opposition.
Or, he'll come out and kick 8!
Lightning McQueen wrote:MW wrote:How's old mate Scoop on twitter justifying it cause he's one of the best ever, it was ages ago and it was at a private function...and getting absolutely smashed for it on twitter. What a f..khead.
link?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 208 guests