stan wrote:Broadbent also looks likely to stay. Probably Lobbe is the one you will be able to move on. Im not sure we would be in the running for him. I think we would maybe look at Minson as a back up with Giles until Lycett and the eventual return of Nic Nat.
West Coast would be mad to pick up Lobbe. Might play every game next year, but then you'd be paying him a stonking amount to battle Lycett to be Naitanui's #2.
I think Lobbe is going to be another Hartlett. Paid too much, for too long for his ability and Port would need to take a big hit to overcome that.
West Coast are looking at minson not lobbe apparently.
Back to Lobbe - with the games that boyd and roughead played, would the dogs even want him? Maybe as backup, but as others have said, he would be on very good coin that the dogs might not want to pay
No way! Bevo plays with the mobile ruckmen. Boyd is developing into a ruck/fwd and him and roughead both have amazing contested marking ability and get around the ground pretty well... lobbe is slow and crap. He is similar to minson and so why would we get a replacement for him?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I am not talking to you for 3 minutes because you punched me in the head and it hurt and that was not okay for you to do
Brodlach wrote:Only pick 19, cannot see that helping too much
They should have got bombers number 1 pick
Then they should of let us beat them lol. They don't deserve any PP's, were gifted 3 flags in a row, now they have a couple of bad years and they are crying.
Brodlach wrote:Only pick 19, cannot see that helping too much
They should have got bombers number 1 pick
Then they should of let us beat them lol. They don't deserve any PP's, were gifted 3 flags in a row, now they have a couple of bad years and they are crying.
At least they didn't get pick 1 as a result of a punishment for drug cheating.
Brodlach wrote:Only pick 19, cannot see that helping too much
They should have got bombers number 1 pick
Then they should of let us beat them lol. They don't deserve any PP's, were gifted 3 flags in a row, now they have a couple of bad years and they are crying.
At least they didn't get pick 1 as a result of a punishment for drug cheating.
Can't punish us twice. Would happily give back pick 1 for the picks we had taken off us
So if Vickery goes to Hawthorn, who plays forward for Richmond? Griffiths? Not proven. Maric/Hampson? No chance. I can't see Richmond improving next year at all. In fact I can see them going backwards. Prestia isn't the answer for the Tiges but he does add midfield strength. I dunno exactly where their improvement is going to come from!
Since when is it hartletts initiative to be traded. Ports obviously told him theyd prefer him to move on and he best go pick a club, else theyll choose for him?
If port wanted him theyd be publicly stating he is untouchable
Can he be traded to a club without his own consent, such as in major league baseball
marbles wrote:Since when is it hartletts initiative to be traded. Ports obviously told him theyd prefer him to move on and he best go pick a club, else theyll choose for him?
If port wanted him theyd be publicly stating he is untouchable
Can he be traded to a club without his own consent, such as in major league baseball
marbles wrote:Since when is it hartletts initiative to be traded. Ports obviously told him theyd prefer him to move on and he best go pick a club, else theyll choose for him?
If port wanted him theyd be publicly stating he is untouchable
Can he be traded to a club without his own consent, such as in major league baseball
No, as he is contracted.
Port have handled this hartlett thing absolutely terribly..embarrassing for the kid and the club
