Brodlach wrote:So they won by 62, what margin constitutes a good win?
They won by 62 against a team who has one 2 of their last 12 games. Nothing too special about that. North are useless. You'll get torn a new arsehole next week.
Won't go anywhere kicking 15 behinds in a game....
Three of the four winning teams kicked 15 points or more
Last edited by Brodlach on Sun Sep 11, 2016 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
am Bays wrote:I don't think Adelaide will go much further in the finals because:
1. They are not as good at ground balls as the other finals teams - their players have a tendency to lift their heads before taking he ball - good teams don't. They were better at it last night but against Collingwood and West Coast they were poor at it.
2. There hand ball more often at the feet of their team mattes or they loop it. makes them easy to break down.
3. Their goal scoring accuracy - poor goal kicking against St Kilda, North Melb, Melbourne and West Coast earlier in the season arguably cost them 4th spot on percentage.
This is not the to say the Crows are hopeless but compared to Hawthorn, Sydney, Geelong and GWS they aren't in the same class, IMO
What the Crows do do well though is their team defence and press. They certainly make it hard for teams to transition out of their D50 which gives Adelaide opportunities for repeat F 50 entries.
Nice summary, can't disagree with too much of that
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Tough game next week. What would be interesting is if Adelaide some how got through and then an entire team of blokes going to the MCG and playing against a team that has a bloke that left them for a few reasons, but one major reason was to win a flag. Wouldn't need more motivation than that as a group.
I reckon who ever wins the this match will go through to the GF.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Tough game next week. What would be interesting is if Adelaide some how got through and then an entire team of blokes going to the MCG and playing against a team that has a bloke that left them for a few reasons, but one major reason was to win a flag. Wouldn't need more motivation than that as a group.
I reckon who ever wins the this match will go through to the GF.
I don't think Danger has ever stated he left for a premiership, was always about returning home. Crows fans just love Booing, Christ they even Boo former delisted/traded players
Brodlach wrote:So they won by 62, what margin constitutes a good win?
They won by 62 against a team who has one 2 of their last 12 games. Nothing too special about that. North are useless. You'll get torn a new arsehole next week.
Won't go anywhere kicking 15 behinds in a game....
Three of the four winning teams kicked 15 points or more
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Tough game next week. What would be interesting is if Adelaide some how got through and then an entire team of blokes going to the MCG and playing against a team that has a bloke that left them for a few reasons, but one major reason was to win a flag. Wouldn't need more motivation than that as a group.
I reckon who ever wins the this match will go through to the GF.
I don't think Danger has ever stated he left for a premiership, was always about returning home. Crows fans just love Booing, Christ they even Boo former delisted/traded players
FWIW I don't boo him or blame him for anything. He can leave in what ever terms he wishes and he more than did enough in his 7 years in Adelaide.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
Brodlach wrote:So they won by 62, what margin constitutes a good win?
They won by 62 against a team who has one 2 of their last 12 games. Nothing too special about that. North are useless. You'll get torn a new arsehole next week.
Won't go anywhere kicking 15 behinds in a game....
Brodlach wrote:So they won by 62, what margin constitutes a good win?
They won by 62 against a team who has won 2 of their last 12 games. Nothing too special about that. North are useless. You'll get torn a new arsehole next week.
How much did Sydney, Hawthorn, GWS, Geelong & Bulldogs beat North by in that run of 12 games?
Brodlach wrote:So they won by 62, what margin constitutes a good win?
They won by 62 against a team who has won 2 of their last 12 games. Nothing too special about that. North are useless. You'll get torn a new arsehole next week.
How much did Sydney, Hawthorn, GWS, Geelong & Bulldogs beat North by in that run of 12 games?
Totally irrelevant. High margins in finals only mean that the game was over early, and one team has given up. And yes, that's what happened to PA in 2007. 119 points from memory...
If you don’t like my words, don’t listen. If you don’t like my appearance, don’t look. If you don’t like my actions, turn your head; It’s as simple as that.
am Bays wrote:I don't think Adelaide will go much further in the finals because:
1. They are not as good at ground balls as the other finals teams - their players have a tendency to lift their heads before taking he ball - good teams don't. They were better at it last night but against Collingwood and West Coast they were poor at it.
2. There hand ball more often at the feet of their team mattes or they loop it. makes them easy to break down.
3. Their goal scoring accuracy - poor goal kicking against St Kilda, North Melb, Melbourne and West Coast earlier in the season arguably cost them 4th spot on percentage.
This is not the to say the Crows are hopeless but compared to Hawthorn, Sydney, Geelong and GWS they aren't in the same class, IMO
What the Crows do do well though is their team defence and press. They certainly make it hard for teams to transition out of their D50 which gives Adelaide opportunities for repeat F 50 entries.
Do you even football?
They finished a game behind the top 4, percentage had nothing to do with it and therefore neither did accuracy
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019 Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
am Bays wrote:I don't think Adelaide will go much further in the finals because:
1. They are not as good at ground balls as the other finals teams - their players have a tendency to lift their heads before taking he ball - good teams don't. They were better at it last night but against Collingwood and West Coast they were poor at it.
2. There hand ball more often at the feet of their team mattes or they loop it. makes them easy to break down.
3. Their goal scoring accuracy - poor goal kicking against St Kilda, North Melb, Melbourne and West Coast earlier in the season arguably cost them 4th spot on percentage.
This is not the to say the Crows are hopeless but compared to Hawthorn, Sydney, Geelong and GWS they aren't in the same class, IMO
What the Crows do do well though is their team defence and press. They certainly make it hard for teams to transition out of their D50 which gives Adelaide opportunities for repeat F 50 entries.
Do you even football?
They finished a game behind the top 4, percentage had nothing to do with it and therefore neither did accuracy
am Bays wrote:I don't think Adelaide will go much further in the finals because:
1. They are not as good at ground balls as the other finals teams - their players have a tendency to lift their heads before taking he ball - good teams don't. They were better at it last night but against Collingwood and West Coast they were poor at it.
2. There hand ball more often at the feet of their team mattes or they loop it. makes them easy to break down.
3. Their goal scoring accuracy - poor goal kicking against St Kilda, North Melb, Melbourne and West Coast earlier in the season arguably cost them 4th spot on percentage.
This is not the to say the Crows are hopeless but compared to Hawthorn, Sydney, Geelong and GWS they aren't in the same class, IMO
What the Crows do do well though is their team defence and press. They certainly make it hard for teams to transition out of their D50 which gives Adelaide opportunities for repeat F 50 entries.
Do you even football?
They finished a game behind the top 4, percentage had nothing to do with it and therefore neither did accuracy
There was NO pressure in that final. There was even more heat on the contest in the West Coast game. But Tippett and Mills out helps the Crows. The Crows were awesome but that's the end of bruise free goal feasts...and the Crowval.
nuggety goodness wrote:Any love for the Bullies? They absolutely tore the eagles apart and pressure was intense!
Really looking forward to next Friday and i give us a red hot crack at putting the hawks out in straight sets, now wouldn't that be sublime!!!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Lots of love, just a massive task with so many good players hurt, underdone or out of form.
Stringer is a serious headache. If he turns it on he can do anything, but he's given so little for so long I'd be asking whether the dogs need to call up someone who they know will give them soemthing.
5 minutes of brilliance from Stringer is worth more than the bloke who they pull up to replace him. It's worth sticking with him.
Dogs were very solid Thursday night, West Coast however were an absolute embarrassment especially with what after they achieved in the past 3 weeks. I don't think it was so much the pressure from the Dogs, they just worked harder and WCE tapped out in the second quarter. Definitely not a talent issue in that game, was all between the ears.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
nuggety goodness wrote:Any love for the Bullies? They absolutely tore the eagles apart and pressure was intense!
Really looking forward to next Friday and i give us a red hot crack at putting the hawks out in straight sets, now wouldn't that be sublime!!!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Absolutely I give you guys a chance. Were very good Thursday and the pressure was very good as well. Didnt allow us to get going. And again you'll be true underdogs.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
