The Sleeping Giant wrote: True, but the only thing he did wrong was sign a shonky contract, then expect it to be fulfilled by the other party. Other than that, he has hardly been a "bad person".
Well he was hardly honest and innocent himself, despite his current claims. He did say that the driving issue was wanting to go home to Qld, then later decide Sydney was "home"...
Club of his choice wasn't it? What does it matter if he changed his mind.
The Sleeping Giant wrote: True, but the only thing he did wrong was sign a shonky contract, then expect it to be fulfilled by the other party. Other than that, he has hardly been a "bad person".
Well he was hardly honest and innocent himself, despite his current claims. He did say that the driving issue was wanting to go home to Qld, then later decide Sydney was "home"...
Club of his choice wasn't it? What does it matter if he changed his mind.
But the grounds for the clause in the first place were wanting to go "home" eventually... The wording was vague to give negotiating flex about which "home" club in his home state, Qld. Suddenly, with enough money on offer, Sydney suddenly qualified in his eyes...
The Sleeping Giant wrote: True, but the only thing he did wrong was sign a shonky contract, then expect it to be fulfilled by the other party. Other than that, he has hardly been a "bad person".
Well he was hardly honest and innocent himself, despite his current claims. He did say that the driving issue was wanting to go home to Qld, then later decide Sydney was "home"...
Club of his choice wasn't it? What does it matter if he changed his mind.
says a bit about the character of the guy.glad his gone.
The Sleeping Giant wrote: True, but the only thing he did wrong was sign a shonky contract, then expect it to be fulfilled by the other party. Other than that, he has hardly been a "bad person".
Well he was hardly honest and innocent himself, despite his current claims. He did say that the driving issue was wanting to go home to Qld, then later decide Sydney was "home"...
Club of his choice wasn't it? What does it matter if he changed his mind.
says a bit about the character of the guy.glad his gone.
What does it say about the character of those in charge at Adelaide?
The Sleeping Giant wrote: True, but the only thing he did wrong was sign a shonky contract, then expect it to be fulfilled by the other party. Other than that, he has hardly been a "bad person".
Well he was hardly honest and innocent himself, despite his current claims. He did say that the driving issue was wanting to go home to Qld, then later decide Sydney was "home"...
Club of his choice wasn't it? What does it matter if he changed his mind.
But the grounds for the clause in the first place were wanting to go "home" eventually... The wording was vague to give negotiating flex about which "home" club in his home state, Qld. Suddenly, with enough money on offer, Sydney suddenly qualified in his eyes...
Bollocks!!! It was around the introduction of new afl clubs.
The crows agreed to trade him at the end of his contract and then stabbed him in the back!!!!
How honorable??
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
Justice for all would be if all clubs that can draft Tippett baulked at his over the top price tag and no one selected him. Where would that leave him. He would have to forgo the expected fortune and then next year be up for grabs by any club in the draft. That's a scenario i would like to see!!!!!. It wont happen though
Reddeer wrote:Justice for all would be if all clubs that can draft Tippett baulked at his over the top price tag and no one selected him. Where would that leave him. He would have to forgo the expected fortune and then next year be up for grabs by any club in the draft. That's a scenario i would like to see!!!!!. It wont happen though
And the crows just go on as usual, sounds real fair
Reddeer wrote:Justice for all would be if all clubs that can draft Tippett baulked at his over the top price tag and no one selected him. Where would that leave him. He would have to forgo the expected fortune and then next year be up for grabs by any club in the draft. That's a scenario i would like to see!!!!!. It wont happen though
Crow supporters wonder why they are considered the worst in the country.
Reddeer wrote:Justice for all would be if all clubs that can draft Tippett baulked at his over the top price tag and no one selected him. Where would that leave him. He would have to forgo the expected fortune and then next year be up for grabs by any club in the draft. That's a scenario i would like to see!!!!!. It wont happen though
Crow supporters wonder why they are considered the worst in the country.
Surely they have some justification to be upset with the bloke? ( As well as some of their own )
This isn't true. The majority of people who hate the crows are South Australians who follow someone else. Truth is no one else gives a stuff about us compared to the collingwoods, essendons and carltons of the world.
