Page 5 of 8
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:04 am
by Dogwatcher
stan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:You clearly need more. None of them are playing.
1 suspended. 1 injuired. Frampton always injured. Howard just bow injured.
Fair trott of shit luck there as well.
I think they should have factored those possibilities in.
You can never have too many ruckmen - three, for example.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:25 am
by Booney
stan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:You clearly need more. None of them are playing.
1 suspended. 1 injuired. Frampton always injured. Howard just bow injured.
Fair trott of shit luck there as well.
Frampton has strung a few together, might see him in the AFL before the end if the year I suspect.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 11:52 am
by stan
Booney wrote:stan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:You clearly need more. None of them are playing.
1 suspended. 1 injuired. Frampton always injured. Howard just bow injured.
Fair trott of shit luck there as well.
Frampton has strung a few together, might see him in the AFL before the end if the year I suspect.
Well heck boon you may want to see him there sooner as your a bit short in that area. If hes fit in my opinion you need to play him.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:33 pm
by Mickyj
Booney wrote:Ryder, Lobbe, Howard, Frampton. We have 2 experienced ruckman and two young ruckmen on our list, how many do you want us to carry?
Booney they are injured
And it's around the lets say traps that Port delisted Redden then approached him to be on the Rookie list he declined
So if that's true then your club wanted one more ruckman there
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:12 pm
by Booney
Mickyj wrote:Booney wrote:Ryder, Lobbe, Howard, Frampton. We have 2 experienced ruckman and two young ruckmen on our list, how many do you want us to carry?
Booney they are injured
And it's around the lets say traps that Port delisted Redden then approached him to be on the Rookie list he declined
So if that's true then your club wanted one more ruckman there
How many ruckmen do you think most clubs have on their list?
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:10 pm
by Jim05
Booney wrote:Mickyj wrote:Booney wrote:Ryder, Lobbe, Howard, Frampton. We have 2 experienced ruckman and two young ruckmen on our list, how many do you want us to carry?
Booney they are injured
And it's around the lets say traps that Port delisted Redden then approached him to be on the Rookie list he declined
So if that's true then your club wanted one more ruckman there
How many ruckmen do you think most clubs have on their list?
Yeah most clubs would have 3-4 tops and usually one of them is rookie listed
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:15 pm
by valleys07
With the CAS verdict hanging over Ryder's head- we should have gone a "break glass in case of emergency" ruckman in the Rookie Draft. Someone of the Sam Baulderstone mould.
Mitchell and Snelling were obvious selections, Hewett and Houston not so.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:15 am
by Corona Man
With just 2 minor rounds to go, it appears no coach will be sacked in season. Shaping like Leppa looks the first to get cut in post season reviews. Guessing Hardwick safe at Punt road due to such a huge payout to flick him now? Could there be a left field "Sando" type sacking in the offing?
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:02 pm
by Rik E Boy
Chris Scott I hope.
regards,
REB
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:24 pm
by bennymacca
Corona Man wrote:With just 2 minor rounds to go, it appears no coach will be sacked in season. Shaping like Leppa looks the first to get cut in post season reviews. Guessing Hardwick safe at Punt road due to such a huge payout to flick him now? Could there be a left field "Sando" type sacking in the offing?
besides leppa I reckon everyone will go around again
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:46 pm
by JK
But next year gets real interesting
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 6:11 pm
by The Jack
Dimma!
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:27 pm
by Q.
Leppa goneski
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:27 pm
by Q.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:15 pm
by Corona Man
Quick List of candidates...for the now vacant Brisbane Job.
Montgomery
Dew
Sumich
Ratten
Any others?
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:30 pm
by Failed Creation
Corona Man wrote:Quick List of candidates...for the now vacant Brisbane Job.
Montgomery
Dew
Sumich
Ratten
Any others?
Ben Hart
Paul Roos (doubtful, I know)
Mark Harvey
Mark Thompson
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:39 pm
by JK
Burns? Williams?
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:39 pm
by gossipgirl
what about HIRD ?
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:44 pm
by Corona Man
Failed Creation wrote:Corona Man wrote:Quick List of candidates...for the now vacant Brisbane Job.
Montgomery
Dew
Sumich
Ratten
Any others?
Ben Hart
Paul Roos (doubtful, I know)
Mark Harvey
Mark Thompson
Ben Hart a good call, doubt Bomber would go to Brisvegas.
Re: 2016 Coaches - Who is the first to get sacked?
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:50 pm
by westozfalcon
Bomber will be the main target.
In my view it's important we get someone who's an 'outsider' with no previous involvement as a player or official of the club. A clean slate is needed.