by saintal » Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:58 am
by darley16 » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:53 pm
by Magellan » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:05 pm
Traditional revenue streams associated with Club membership and game day attendance have declined markedly.
by heater31 » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:23 pm
Magellan wrote:Not good news for the Panthers, I would've thought.Traditional revenue streams associated with Club membership and game day attendance have declined markedly.
I hope they can raise the money required, but If people aren't prepared to put money into the club via membership and match day spending, then I'm not sure a donation is able to address what appears to be an issue for the longer term?
by VALE PARK » Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:07 pm
by Reddeer » Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:09 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Why not do away with the 4 byes and play another 2 home games at Noarlunga.
Every struggling club would benefit similarly with 2 extra home games.
Club gets more income.
Players get to represent their club and play the game they love.
Supporters get to go to the footy Clubs they love.
Club sponsors get more exposure so would be happy too.
Win win.
Not rocket science in programming.
Time is short,this time next year may be too late.
Why not SANFL?
by therisingblues » Sat Nov 05, 2016 1:05 am
by daysofourlives » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:26 am
therisingblues wrote:Traditional revenue streams associated with Club membership and game day attendance have declined markedly. The Licensed Venue, Jimmy Deane's, has experienced its most difficult trading year since its refurbishment in 2008. This was undertaken with a bank loan of $3.5M with the expectation of annual principal reductions. The Club's anticipated full year performance will be a loss for the third year in a row. Along with the seven other constituent clubs, South Adelaide will receive assistance from the SANFL's Land Divestment Grants distributed over coming years from the sale of land at Football Park. These funds will be used to retire debt. Budget forecasts for 2017 have necessarily been struck on the basis of significant cuts in expenditure. This will impact on the Football Department.
"Traditional revenue streams associated with Club membership and game day attendance have declined markedly."
"The Club's anticipated full year performance will be a loss for the third year in a row."
Let us just dwell on these statements for a bit, and ask, "Why is it so?".
I think Vale Park has made an extremely good point. Two less games would definitely impact revenue streams associated with game day attendance. I would love to hear from anyone who could convince me otherwise. After all, finding the cause of this problem should be our over-riding objective, as opposed to simply rolling out our preferred view of the situation.
It could be that attendances have also fallen in the past three years at Noarlunga. This would also impact said revenue streams, again, this forum is open to those that could convincingly argue how that would not be a factor.
Imagine if BOTH those things have had an impact, i.e. a drop in attendances and the programming of fewer games?
Now what could have simultaneously caused the introduction of too many byes and a drop in average attendances to the fewer games that are being played? This, in spite of South Adelaide's relatively stronger on field performances?
What could have caused this?
by therisingblues » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:01 pm
by johntheclaret » Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:05 pm
therisingblues wrote:Yeah, I think the SANFL goes through a cycle of suddenly planning excessive byes for three years in a row, every 150 years.
Then there's the cycle of regularly breaking various lowest attendance records. This happens about every 150 years too.
Gee, it's a good thing that it is just a cycle and not actually anybody's fault.
by therisingblues » Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:50 pm
johntheclaret wrote:therisingblues wrote:Yeah, I think the SANFL goes through a cycle of suddenly planning excessive byes for three years in a row, every 150 years.
Then there's the cycle of regularly breaking various lowest attendance records. This happens about every 150 years too.
Gee, it's a good thing that it is just a cycle and not actually anybody's fault.
I blame O'Brien. He's caused this and now rumour has it he's buggering off to Vic
by Magellan » Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:10 pm
by therisingblues » Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:56 pm
by Booney » Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:23 am
saintal wrote:The playing group has embraced the trademarks that they have developed with the assistance of Leading Teams.
by darley16 » Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:59 am
by VALE PARK » Mon Nov 07, 2016 12:17 pm
by heater31 » Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:01 pm
VALE PARK wrote:What is the net $ gain per home match for the club at Noarlunga?
by knowledge » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:00 pm
Booney wrote:saintal wrote:The playing group has embraced the trademarks that they have developed with the assistance of Leading Teams.
1 - Can you post the link to the donations page please?
2 - How much does Leading Teams cost? From my understanding it isn't a cheap exercise to bring Leading Teams into an organisation.
by Magellan » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:11 pm
knowledge wrote:Booney wrote:saintal wrote:The playing group has embraced the trademarks that they have developed with the assistance of Leading Teams.
1 - Can you post the link to the donations page please?
2 - How much does Leading Teams cost? From my understanding it isn't a cheap exercise to bring Leading Teams into an organisation.
'
Between $30 and $35K, I believe. Maybe I'm a bit old school, but, I reckon the senior coach leads the team. Might be O.K for a debutant coach to get through the first season, or so, but, a senior coach, not so sure. If you need to invest in outside psychology to extract and challenge the playing group, then maybe the bloke you've got in charge (and I'm not saying Brad Gotch isn't) isn't the right person. The premier side this year didn't use it. Never been a big fan of it. But, that's just my opinion.
by Booney » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:15 pm
knowledge wrote:Booney wrote:saintal wrote:The playing group has embraced the trademarks that they have developed with the assistance of Leading Teams.
1 - Can you post the link to the donations page please?
2 - How much does Leading Teams cost? From my understanding it isn't a cheap exercise to bring Leading Teams into an organisation.
'
Between $30 and $35K, I believe. Maybe I'm a bit old school, but, I reckon the senior coach leads the team. Might be O.K for a debutant coach to get through the first season, or so, but, a senior coach, not so sure. If you need to invest in outside psychology to extract and challenge the playing group, then maybe the bloke you've got in charge (and I'm not saying Brad Gotch isn't) isn't the right person. The premier side this year didn't use it. Never been a big fan of it. But, that's just my opinion.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |