
by Hondo » Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:17 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:46 am
hondo71 wrote:Rule 5 - People with over 1,000 posts are always the authority in an argument
by Footy Chick » Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:41 pm
hondo71 wrote:Rule 5 - People with over 1,000 posts are always the authority in an argument
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by power01 » Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:58 pm
by Booney » Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:50 pm
Lunchcutter wrote:Booney wrote:"proud to have lived/worked in the northern suburbs for the last 35 years! so put that in your pipe and smoke it! "
With that in mind,I bet you have.
blow it out your arse booneyproved my point anyhow
by Rik E Boy » Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:32 pm
power01 wrote:the biggest unwritten rules include...........
Post on every thread that REB writes, coz he loves the attention..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by power01 » Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:02 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:power01 wrote:the biggest unwritten rules include...........
Post on every thread that REB writes, coz he loves the attention..
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
regards,
REB
by doggies4eva » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:39 am
doggies4eva wrote:Being a bit slow it has taken me a while to learn the rules. Some others may benefit to know what they are:
1. The umpires are always wrong.
2. The writers in the Advertisers are always wrong except when stating that the umpiring was poor.
3. When lower clubs like Sturt or North have a win all supporters must come out and praise their teams and coaches ad nausium.
4. If the Advertiser gives teams mentioned in rule 3 praise the paper is wrong for not going far enough.
I think that's it maybe I've missed some - feel free to add any.
by Hondo » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:17 am
doggies4eva wrote:doggies4eva wrote:Being a bit slow it has taken me a while to learn the rules. Some others may benefit to know what they are:
1. The umpires are always wrong.
2. The writers in the Advertisers are always wrong except when stating that the umpiring was poor.
3. When lower clubs like Sturt or North have a win all supporters must come out and praise their teams and coaches ad nausium.
4. If the Advertiser gives teams mentioned in rule 3 praise the paper is wrong for not going far enough.
I think that's it maybe I've missed some - feel free to add any.
OK I'll change rule 3 to be more politically correct:
3. Supporters of teams that have been doing it tough are encouraged to celebrate any wins with enthusiasm and longevity (while they are winning).
Will that do?
by topsywaldron » Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:57 pm
power01 wrote: Never say anything nasty, horrible or simply truthful or honest about Norwood, coz if you do it will be the end of your life as you know it...
by doggies4eva » Tue May 01, 2007 8:51 pm
by sturt1 » Tue May 01, 2007 9:31 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue May 01, 2007 10:25 pm
doggies4eva wrote:I especially liked the one where you have to use an emoticon after personally attacking someone
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by doggies4eva » Wed May 02, 2007 12:40 am
Punk Rooster wrote:doggies4eva wrote:I especially liked the one where you have to use an emoticon after personally attacking someone
<insert forum member's name> is a pedeaophile, drug addict, homosexual rapist, & stole money from the collection plate
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |