Booney wrote:Tough for any of us to judge the form of some one we have not seen play this year,lets keep that in mind before we go and say some players are not deserving of their sopt in the squad.
This will not happen often but -
Well said Booney
by Blue Boy » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:16 am
Booney wrote:Tough for any of us to judge the form of some one we have not seen play this year,lets keep that in mind before we go and say some players are not deserving of their sopt in the squad.
by sus » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:35 am
drebin wrote:You haven't seen Howard play this year have you sus?
by JK » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:48 am
Booney wrote:Tough for any of us to judge the form of some one we have not seen play this year,lets keep that in mind before we go and say some players are not deserving of their sopt in the squad.
by Aerie » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:51 am
by Booney » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:55 am
Blue Boy wrote:Booney wrote:Tough for any of us to judge the form of some one we have not seen play this year,lets keep that in mind before we go and say some players are not deserving of their sopt in the squad.
This will not happen often but -
Well said Booney
by drebin » Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:54 pm
sus wrote:drebin wrote:You haven't seen Howard play this year have you sus?
Yes I have. And plenty of times in recent years at WA too. Your only questioning my judgement becuase he's at North - typical one-eyed biased view as usual Dribble
by Blue Boy » Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:58 pm
drebin wrote:sus wrote:drebin wrote:You haven't seen Howard play this year have you sus?
Yes I have. And plenty of times in recent years at WA too. Your only questioning my judgement becuase he's at North - typical one-eyed biased view as usual Dribble
f*** off sus if you can't be intelligent
by drebin » Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:06 pm
by sus » Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:06 pm
drebin wrote:sus wrote:drebin wrote:You haven't seen Howard play this year have you sus?
Yes I have. And plenty of times in recent years at WA too. Your only questioning my judgement becuase he's at North - typical one-eyed biased view as usual Dribble
f*** off sus if you can't be intelligent
by Blue Boy » Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:22 pm
drebin wrote:Yep i'm pisssed off today and then you read shit like sus writes and then has the cheek to call my posts dribble???
Well sus as your such an expert on all things Dean Howard - have you seen him play this year and why is it that he is either joint leader or near the top of all the media POTY voting then?
P.S. Yes I am slightly biaised towards my team along with every other person who uses these forums or are you the exception - does that make you so "special" that you can be a codesending dickhead!
by sus » Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:23 pm
drebin wrote:Yep i'm pisssed off today and then you read shit like sus writes and then has the cheek to call my posts dribble???
Well sus as your such an expert on all things Dean Howard - have you seen him play this year and why is it that he is either joint leader or near the top of all the media POTY voting then?
P.S. Yes I am slightly biaised towards my team along with every other person who uses these forums or are you the exception - does that make you so "special" that you can be a codesending dickhead!
by rod_rooster » Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:44 pm
sus wrote:drebin wrote:Yep i'm pisssed off today and then you read shit like sus writes and then has the cheek to call my posts dribble???
Well sus as your such an expert on all things Dean Howard - have you seen him play this year and why is it that he is either joint leader or near the top of all the media POTY voting then?
P.S. Yes I am slightly biaised towards my team along with every other person who uses these forums or are you the exception - does that make you so "special" that you can be a codesending dickhead!
I admit it was a poor attempt on a play on words to call you "Dribble" Drebin (I didnt call your post dribble - BB got it). I didnt mean to viciously offend you. Only meant as a bit of lighthearted ribbing. So I apologise if the context was misinterpreted.
I stand by what I said though - I have always found your comments extremely biased and defensive in favour of your beloved NA. Mind you your not on your 'pat malone' there - within this forum or the general footy community. And Ill alwyas be critical of people who cant hold back their bias a little bit.
Anyway I'll never stoop or reduce my comments to nasty four-letter vicious outbursts. Some anger management and control is needed on your part I reckon.
And Im not an expert on anything football - just someone with an opinion. My opnion is Howard is not deserving to be in the squad ahead of some young blokes who may have 3 or 4 state campaigns left in them.
by drebin » Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:06 pm
rod_rooster wrote:sus wrote:drebin wrote:Yep i'm pisssed off today and then you read shit like sus writes and then has the cheek to call my posts dribble???
Well sus as your such an expert on all things Dean Howard - have you seen him play this year and why is it that he is either joint leader or near the top of all the media POTY voting then?
P.S. Yes I am slightly biaised towards my team along with every other person who uses these forums or are you the exception - does that make you so "special" that you can be a codesending dickhead!
I admit it was a poor attempt on a play on words to call you "Dribble" Drebin (I didnt call your post dribble - BB got it). I didnt mean to viciously offend you. Only meant as a bit of lighthearted ribbing. So I apologise if the context was misinterpreted.
I stand by what I said though - I have always found your comments extremely biased and defensive in favour of your beloved NA. Mind you your not on your 'pat malone' there - within this forum or the general footy community. And Ill alwyas be critical of people who cant hold back their bias a little bit.
Anyway I'll never stoop or reduce my comments to nasty four-letter vicious outbursts. Some anger management and control is needed on your part I reckon.
And Im not an expert on anything football - just someone with an opinion. My opnion is Howard is not deserving to be in the squad ahead of some young blokes who may have 3 or 4 state campaigns left in them.
But are those young blokes better players now? The State side is picked for a one off game. The best players for that game need to be picked. The state side isn't a club that needs to develop younger players. They will always be able to pick the best players available so therefore when those younger players are ready they will be picked. Just my opinion.
by doggies4eva » Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:33 pm
drebin wrote:sus wrote:drebin wrote:You haven't seen Howard play this year have you sus?
Yes I have. And plenty of times in recent years at WA too. Your only questioning my judgement becuase he's at North - typical one-eyed biased view as usual Dribble
Go away sus if you can't be intelligent
by Blue Boy » Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:45 pm
drebin wrote:rod_rooster wrote:sus wrote:drebin wrote:Yep i'm pisssed off today and then you read shit like sus writes and then has the cheek to call my posts dribble???
Well sus as your such an expert on all things Dean Howard - have you seen him play this year and why is it that he is either joint leader or near the top of all the media POTY voting then?
P.S. Yes I am slightly biaised towards my team along with every other person who uses these forums or are you the exception - does that make you so "special" that you can be a codesending dickhead!
I admit it was a poor attempt on a play on words to call you "Dribble" Drebin (I didnt call your post dribble - BB got it). I didnt mean to viciously offend you. Only meant as a bit of lighthearted ribbing. So I apologise if the context was misinterpreted.
I stand by what I said though - I have always found your comments extremely biased and defensive in favour of your beloved NA. Mind you your not on your 'pat malone' there - within this forum or the general footy community. And Ill alwyas be critical of people who cant hold back their bias a little bit.
Anyway I'll never stoop or reduce my comments to nasty four-letter vicious outbursts. Some anger management and control is needed on your part I reckon.
And Im not an expert on anything football - just someone with an opinion. My opnion is Howard is not deserving to be in the squad ahead of some young blokes who may have 3 or 4 state campaigns left in them.
But are those young blokes better players now? The State side is picked for a one off game. The best players for that game need to be picked. The state side isn't a club that needs to develop younger players. They will always be able to pick the best players available so therefore when those younger players are ready they will be picked. Just my opinion.
Well don't have ago at me for my opinion and the inference that what I post is dribble - no matter how you intended it - it read that way IMO.
I wouldn't say I was extremely biased - but naturally I am biased and defensive (if the NAFC is attacked) toward my club - no orphan there as you stated but "extreme" is a bit rich? However that is your opinion of how my posts read and your entitled to it. I accept your apology that is wasn't a personal attack originally which is what upset me so I will go back and modify my original post then but I can't do anything about the quoted text! So play on...
by Wedgie » Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:44 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:51 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Mickyj » Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:17 pm
Wedgie wrote:From what I've seen this year Dean Howard and Nick Gill would be the first 2 picked.
Must admit I'd have Lindsay ahead of O'Hara at this stage though.
by drebin » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:34 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |