How is your side going to line up this year?

[mighty_tiger_79]

because we havent finished our recruiting!!!!!!!!!

and our players tend to get played in positions they arent supposed to be

So tell us who the Bays are after - seems most "big names" have already been grabbed. I bet your answer is anybody!

WE ARE AFTER THE PLAYERS THAT ANDREW JARMAN REJECTS

[Jimmy]

because we havent finished our recruiting!!!!!!!!!

and our players tend to get played in positions they arent supposed to be

So tell us who the Bays are after - seems most "big names" have already been grabbed. I bet your answer is anybody!

WE ARE AFTER THE PLAYERS THAT ANDREW JARMAN REJECTS

you take their rejects, we take their good players and turn them into champions!!

[Wedgie]

WE ARE AFTER THE PLAYERS THAT ANDREW JARMAN REJECTS

What, like Ebel, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Davis, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Hargraves, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Oakley, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Grocke, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Squire, oh hang on, no he went to Sturt.
What, like Atkinson, oh hang on, ho he went to Sturt.
What, like Gum, oh hang on, no he went elsewhere.

Oh, hang on, you got Herbert! No wonder the Bays are where they are!


PS In all honesty, thanks for rejecting Gill after having first dibs on him. Pity the coach didn't even want to go out of his way to chat to him!

[mighty_tiger_79]

WE ARE AFTER THE PLAYERS THAT ANDREW JARMAN REJECTS

What, like Ebel, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Davis, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Hargraves, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Oakley, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Grocke, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Squire, oh hang on, no he went to Sturt.
What, like Atkinson, oh hang on, ho he went to Sturt.
What, like Gum, oh hang on, no he went elsewhere.

Oh, hang on, you got Herbert! No wonder the Bays are where they are!


PS In all honesty, thanks for rejecting Gill after having first dibs on him. Pity the coach didn't even want to go out of his way to chat to him!

all of those above clubs walk a very fine line when it comes to the SALARY CAP, whereas we are always under it. besides we offered a few of those players the money they deserve, not the money that they got paid because they think they deserve it.

GILL is a handy player and did have a good year for north but im quite content in the fact that we dont have him.

[sturt1]

WE ARE AFTER THE PLAYERS THAT ANDREW JARMAN REJECTS

What, like Ebel, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Davis, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Hargraves, oh hang on, no he went to Port.
What, like Oakley, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Grocke, oh hang on, no he went to the Eagles.
What, like Squire, oh hang on, no he went to Sturt.
What, like Atkinson, oh hang on, ho he went to Sturt.
What, like Gum, oh hang on, no he went elsewhere.

Oh, hang on, you got Herbert! No wonder the Bays are where they are!


PS In all honesty, thanks for rejecting Gill after having first dibs on him. Pity the coach didn't even want to go out of his way to chat to him!

all of those above clubs walk a very fine line when it comes to the SALARY CAP, whereas we are always under it. besides we offered a few of those players the money they deserve, not the money that they got paid because they think they deserve it.

GILL is a handy player and did have a good year for north but im quite content in the fact that we dont have him.

The Stringers

[Wedgie]

all of those above clubs walk a very fine line when it comes to the SALARY CAP, whereas we are always under it. besides we offered a few of those players the money they deserve, not the money that they got paid because they think they deserve it.

GILL is a handy player and did have a good year for north but im quite content in the fact that we dont have him.

So you're after the players that North reject like Herbert but you're not interested in players like Gill?
Geez, with that sort of philosophy I find it really hard to work out why the Bays haven't played finals football this century.
You're not the Glenelg recruitment officer by any chance?

[mighty_tiger_79]

all of those above clubs walk a very fine line when it comes to the SALARY CAP, whereas we are always under it. besides we offered a few of those players the money they deserve, not the money that they got paid because they think they deserve it.

GILL is a handy player and did have a good year for north but im quite content in the fact that we dont have him.

So you're after the players that North reject like Herbert but you're not interested in players like Gill?
Geez, with that sort of philosophy I find it really hard to work out why the Bays haven't played finals football this century.
You're not the Glenelg recruitment officer by any chance?

we had players that fitted into our forward line structure...........we dont rely on big names!!!

sturt were walking a fine line with the salary cap not that long ago........

[Wedgie]

we had players that fitted into our forward line structure...........we dont rely on big names!!!

sturt were walking a fine line with the salary cap not that long ago........

Whoops, sorry, you caught me mid edit.
Yeah good point about the forward line structure, worked a treat in the finals. WTF?
Sturt walking a fine line with the salary cap, cripes, you have about as much idea about recruiting as you do player payments.

[mighty_tiger_79]

we had players that fitted into our forward line structure...........we dont rely on big names!!!

sturt were walking a fine line with the salary cap not that long ago........

Whoops, sorry, you caught me mid edit.
Yeah good point about the forward line structure, worked a treat in the finals. WTF?
Sturt walking a fine line with the salary cap, cripes, you have about as much idea about recruiting as you do player payments.

our forward line wasnt that bad its been our defence that needs work.

[Wedgie]

our forward line wasnt that bad its been our defence that needs work.

Dunno about that considering your back line let through less points than North or Port (and only 2 more points than South) and was miles in front of any other team in the bottom 4. You do realise Gill can play down back to don't you?

[mighty_tiger_79]

our forward line wasnt that bad its been our defence that needs work.

Dunno about that considering your back line let through less points than North or Port (and only 2 more points than South) and was miles in front of any other team in the bottom 4. You do realise Gill can play down back to don't you?

well lets see NORTH play a one dimensional game plan and PORT well they had a bad year despite making the finals and SOUTH over achieved.

our defense can be and should be stronger.

I understand that GILL can play anywhere and everywhere and is a player who will dominate at AFL level, but im still content he isnt at brighton rd.

[Wedgie]

I understand that GILL can play anywhere and everywhere and is a player who will dominate at AFL level, but im still content he isnt at brighton rd.

So you're content that your club let Gill go through sheer incompetence as opposed to actually choosing to not have him?
Good attitude at your club, once again, hard to see why they're the only team in the league not to play finals this century with that sort of thought pattern.

[mighty_tiger_79]

well they may have made up there mind in not wanting him and it looks like sheer incompetence in the way it was handled, still i dont mind that he isnt playing for us.

no point making finals if you arent going to do anything. so when we make the finals we will go all the way!!!!!!!!!

[Wedgie]

well they may have made up there mind in not wanting him and it looks like sheer incompetence in the way it was handled, still i dont mind that he isnt playing for us.

no point making finals if you arent going to do anything. so when we make the finals we will go all the way!!!!!!!!!

lol, rest assured you'll only be getting beaten by One Dimensional North twice this year as opposed to the 3 times last year.
Does that make the Bays .33 dimensional?

[mal]

MT79
Instead of going to Red Rooster for lunch on wednesdays lets
go to the Grand North.

[mighty_tiger_79]

well they may have made up there mind in not wanting him and it looks like sheer incompetence in the way it was handled, still i dont mind that he isnt playing for us.

no point making finals if you arent going to do anything. so when we make the finals we will go all the way!!!!!!!!!

lol, rest assured you'll only be getting beaten by One Dimensional North twice this year as opposed to the 3 times last year.
Does that make the Bays .33 dimensional?

im quite confident that we will beat north at least once this year

[mighty_tiger_79]

MT79
Instead of going to Red Rooster for lunch on wednesdays lets
go to the Grand North.

MAL i didnt think you would want to have lunch so close to home of yatala!

[Wedgie]

im quite confident that we will beat north at least once this year

Good to hear, as I heard exactly that this time last year!

[mighty_tiger_79]

im quite confident that we will beat north at least once this year

Good to hear, as I heard exactly that this time last year!

we didnt quite get over the line in one of the games but i think we showed that we can match it the SALARY CAP roosters on the field

[stampy]

thought i'd break the monotony. Go the bays!!!!!