by Pseudo » Tue May 15, 2007 1:15 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue May 15, 2007 1:30 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by redden whites » Tue May 15, 2007 4:48 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Tue May 15, 2007 10:44 pm
Pseudo wrote:Just wondering what the Magpies fans think about the PAPs planning to line up in the prison bars jumper. If I was a Port fan (God forbid) I'd be annoyed at having those johnny-come-latelys in my team's jumper.
by BPBRB » Tue May 15, 2007 10:48 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:Pseudo wrote:Just wondering what the Magpies fans think about the PAPs planning to line up in the prison bars jumper. If I was a Port fan (God forbid) I'd be annoyed at having those johnny-come-latelys in my team's jumper.
let's respect the Powers heritage. F#*@ knows I can't stand them or the Magpies but let's face it they were born from the Port Adelaide Magpies club unlike the Crows who were born to represent the SANFL as a whole so as a neutral supporter I feel they have every right to wear the black & white prison bars. Afterall it is back to the 70's for god sake what did Port wear in the 70's it was the blsck & white prison bar strip.
by Il Duce » Tue May 15, 2007 10:58 pm
by therisingblues » Wed May 16, 2007 12:05 am
eaglehaslanded wrote:let's respect the Powers heritage. F#*@ knows I can't stand them or the Magpies but let's face it they were born from the Port Adelaide Magpies club unlike the Crows who were born to represent the SANFL as a whole so as a neutral supporter I feel they have every right to wear the black & white prison bars. Afterall it is back to the 70's for god sake what did Port wear in the 70's it was the blsck & white prison bar strip.
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 8:51 am
*sigh*therisingblues wrote: When Port were denied their Magpie guernsey in the AFL, I took it as a snub to all SANFL clubs.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Hondo » Wed May 16, 2007 9:25 am
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 9:31 am
they are wearing the PAM jumper for heritage round- what's the problem?hondo71 wrote:It's irrelevant that the team is now nick-named the Power and have teal in the colours. The heritage of the PAFC is the B&W prison bars and it's heritage round. Throw the standard guernseys (and sometimes the colours) out and have some fun with it.
FGS, West Coast are wearing the original WA State-of-Origin jumper. It's black and gold .... not their original colours ..... it's Richmond's colours .... West Coast agreed to not use the traditional state colours when they joined ..... yawn .... yawn .... yawn .....
Heritage round is a nostalgic throw-back - one for the fans. Everyone take a chill pill about it, including Eddie.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Hondo » Wed May 16, 2007 9:40 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Perhaps theri you should take it as a snub that Port wished to turn it's back on the SANFL- not the AFL for insisting the conditions they joined under are upheld....
Punk Rooster wrote:they are wearing the PAM jumper for heritage round - what's the problem?
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 9:42 am
you're quoting me out of context- my original reply is directed at a statement made by therisingblues.hondo71 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Perhaps theri you should take it as a snub that Port wished to turn it's back on the SANFL- not the AFL for insisting the conditions they joined under are upheld....Punk Rooster wrote:they are wearing the PAM jumper for heritage round - what's the problem?
You tell me
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by rod_rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 10:03 am
Punk Rooster wrote:*sigh*therisingblues wrote: When Port were denied their Magpie guernsey in the AFL, I took it as a snub to all SANFL clubs.
When Port Adelaide signalled their intention to join the AFL, there was already a Black & White team called the Magpies, who quite rightly objected.
Therefore, Port were required to come up with an alternate nickname & colours if they wanted to join, & as they still wanted to join after those conditions were placed, they came up with the alternate "Port Power" & a jumper consisting of black, teal, white & silver (although silver was no immediately introduced).
Perhaps theri you should take it as a snub that Port wished to turn it's back on the SANFL- not the AFL for insisting the conditions they joined under are upheld....
by Booney » Wed May 16, 2007 11:18 am
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 12:02 pm
sorry for posting on topic & using facts/defending my posts...Booney wrote:Bloody hell Punky,get over it.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by doggies4eva » Wed May 16, 2007 1:33 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:*sigh*therisingblues wrote: When Port were denied their Magpie guernsey in the AFL, I took it as a snub to all SANFL clubs.
When Port Adelaide signalled their intention to join the AFL, there was already a Black & White team called the Magpies, who quite rightly objected.
Therefore, Port were required to come up with an alternate nickname & colours if they wanted to join, & as they still wanted to join after those conditions were placed, they came up with the alternate "Port Power" & a jumper consisting of black, teal, white & silver (although silver was no immediately introduced).
Perhaps theri you should take it as a snub that Port wished to turn it's back on the SANFL- not the AFL for insisting the conditions they joined under are upheld....
I understand there was already a team nicknamed the Magpies. Fair enough Port had to come up with another nickname. If Port wanted to wear the Collingood jumper (and god only knows why anyone would want to wear the current abomination they mascaraed around in) then i can inderstand Collingwood objecting. If Port wanted to wear Black and White against Collingwood i can also understand Collingwood's issue. I can't, however, work out the reason why Collingwood care if Port wear the prison bar guernsey whenever they like. So what if it is the same colours the design is completely different. As has been pointed out no other club has such insecurities as to not allow another to wear the same colurs providing they have a different design. I really hate sticking up for Port but i can't help but feel Collingwood have some sort of inferiority complex as to insist no other club wears Black and White.
Personally i'd like to See Port wear the prison bars every week just so there is the chance to see that guernsey lose.
by doggies4eva » Wed May 16, 2007 1:35 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:sorry for posting on topic & using facts/defending my posts...Booney wrote:Bloody hell Punky,get over it.
by therisingblues » Wed May 16, 2007 1:52 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:*sigh*therisingblues wrote: When Port were denied their Magpie guernsey in the AFL, I took it as a snub to all SANFL clubs.
When Port Adelaide signalled their intention to join the AFL, there was already a Black & White team called the Magpies, who quite rightly objected.
Therefore, Port were required to come up with an alternate nickname & colours if they wanted to join, & as they still wanted to join after those conditions were placed, they came up with the alternate "Port Power" & a jumper consisting of black, teal, white & silver (although silver was no immediately introduced).
Perhaps theri you should take it as a snub that Port wished to turn it's back on the SANFL- not the AFL for insisting the conditions they joined under are upheld....
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 16, 2007 2:47 pm
something the VFL/clubs at the time failed to address correctly (imo)therisingblues wrote:And how many teams wear Blue and White? No problem there.
did Fitzroy object? No. Hence the AFL had no need to act- also, the Crows weren't trying to call themselves the Lions either.therisingblues wrote:Weren't the Crows colours the same as the Fitzroy Lions when they joined? What is it with Collingwood?
Collingwood were within their rights to protect their image in a world exceedingly corporatised.therisingblues wrote:And I am not taking it as a snub that those conditions were upheld, but rather, those conditions were introduced in the first place.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |