LATE MAL 9

Best Bets? Talking Odds? This is the place.

Re: LATE MAL 9

Postby Dutchy » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:46 pm

G wrote:Where are all the people who have spruiked about each of the last 8 LATE MAL's saying they have taken out thousands from their various bank accounts or stashes and unloaded for EASY MONEY on the selections ? :oops: :oops:

AAAhhh thats why the LATE MAL followers are so cluey, cos they left this one alone and didnt do their balls. Going by previous posts there were some that were going to be divorced or in deep shit if the LATE MAL let them down yet when by a freak of nature it happened all is sweet ;) ;)



Image
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44648
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2333 times
Been liked: 3567 times

Re: LATE MAL 9

Postby MAY-Z » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:34 am

mal wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
helicopterking wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:That race is the precise reason why harness racing is no longer an option for big
punters as there is way to much of an amateur element to the drivers when you compare it to sports betting


And backing horses at $1.30, in harness racing, is not the smartest move,way to many things can go wrong.



every late mal when broken by a loss shows a profit $$$$

but who wants to make money?????



LATE MAL 48 goes under :oops:
Late Mal results
48 Late Mals
44 wins
4 losses

On a $1 per selection betting using Unitab dividends
Late Mals show a $10.00 profit


8 in a row this cycle
Managed a sMALl profit for the cycle

I will refrain from commenting on why LM9 this cycle was beaten , until I view the Stewards Report


Drivers Ashleigh Dunkley (PROMINENT ART) and Geoffrey Gee (IM AGENT EIGHTYSIX NZ) were queried regarding their respective tactics racing down the back the first time when contesting for the position outside the leader CLASSIC TYCOON ($1.10 fav.). Mr Dunkley stated that PROMINENT ART was a large ungainly horse which had raced best previously when able to lead or sit in the death and for that reason he had elected to hold the position outside the leader when challenged by IM AGENT EIGHTYSIX NZ as he felt that this was his best option. Mr Gee stated that he had initially looked to go back and take a trail however after taking some evasion action entering the first turn when HEI BERT and BLISSFULL NIGHT appeared to briefly lock stays, that IM AGENT EIGHTYSIX NZ had then grabbed the bit so he elected to go forward and see if the position outside the leader was available. Mr Gee further stated that he had only contested for this position for a brief distance before restraining IM AGENT EIGHTYSIX NZ in an attempt to ease the pace so as to gain some respite. In considering the matter the Panel were of the opinion that the respective explanations were not unreasonable given the circumstances and no further action was taken.
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Previous

Board index   General Talk  The Gambling Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |