old farmer wrote:You must have been caught up in the Raynor hype like everyone else including the umpires. Got a lot of easy touches hanging out on his own when we decided not to tag him in the 1st half. Didn't like the tag and didn't have a huge influence in the 2nd half but is still too good to go kickless, also got some easy frees. If he was best then that is taking a bit away from a couple of their other players who probably did the hard work to get the ball to Rayner out on his own. Next you'll say Stubby was in their best, when he kicked 3 early and 3 late but nothing for an hour in between. Is 1/2 a game good enough.........On a side note, what is it with their 2 key forwards and their AFL style celebrations after goals to about 10 WS supporters on the sidelines, you look like dicks seriously and Stubbys little bow on one knee, fair dinkum.
Nope not caught up in any hype, he carved us up. Yep may have been easy touches early on because he was allowed to roam free, but he made us pay, and we have no one to blame but ourselves for that, and then in the last quarter when it mattered he found the space and ball again, and again cut us to shreds.
No I thought Stubberfield was ordinary, couple of gimme goals early, then a few late in the last quarter, but like you said stuff all in between, and I thought he never looked a threat, lazy forward. If he didnt mark it, he didn't seem bothered to apply any sort of defensive pressure.
Had we won the game, I would say that ruckman Steve Gannell would deserve the 3 votes, he turned the game in our favour with an outstanding 3rd quarter, dominated the ruck and gave our on-ballers 1st use out the middle. He got around the ground really well and took some strong marks as well. Rick Mount was absolutely outstanding for us as well, kid just keeps on keeping on!!