its a good recognition for a consistent and outstanding season - especially good luck to those who are still contention - to be best and fairest in a premiership year is a fine achievement.
premierships are still better though.

by finn » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:14 am
by Choccies » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:22 am
finn wrote:congrats to all medal winners.
its a good recognition for a consistent and outstanding season - especially good luck to those who are still contention - to be best and fairest in a premiership year is a fine achievement.
premierships are still better though.
by Bradman » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:23 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:How a side can be outscored 31-23 to 1-1 and a player score votes from losing side is a disgrace
the amount of times i saw this last night throughout the grades was mind boggling to say the least! No disrespect to the guys that won medals but geez takes some shine off if you ask me!
I dont agree, i think its good the umpires notice the efforts of an individual especially if his side is copping a flogging.
by nuggety goodness » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:25 am
Bradman wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:How a side can be outscored 31-23 to 1-1 and a player score votes from losing side is a disgrace
the amount of times i saw this last night throughout the grades was mind boggling to say the least! No disrespect to the guys that won medals but geez takes some shine off if you ask me!
I dont agree, i think its good the umpires notice the efforts of an individual especially if his side is copping a flogging.
Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
by valleys07 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:55 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:56 am
Bradman wrote:Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
by Bradman » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:19 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
So if a bloke racks up a million possies, clearly wins his position, runs hard all day, is at the bottom of every pack and his team loses by a mountain load you wouldnt give him a vote? i wouldnt give a bloke a sympathy vote but if i felt he deserved it i would. then again im not an ump and i dont know how they think
by LMA » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:26 pm
Bradman wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:How a side can be outscored 31-23 to 1-1 and a player score votes from losing side is a disgrace
the amount of times i saw this last night throughout the grades was mind boggling to say the least! No disrespect to the guys that won medals but geez takes some shine off if you ask me!
I dont agree, i think its good the umpires notice the efforts of an individual especially if his side is copping a flogging.
Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
by Bradman » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:30 pm
LMA wrote:Bradman wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:How a side can be outscored 31-23 to 1-1 and a player score votes from losing side is a disgrace
the amount of times i saw this last night throughout the grades was mind boggling to say the least! No disrespect to the guys that won medals but geez takes some shine off if you ask me!
I dont agree, i think its good the umpires notice the efforts of an individual especially if his side is copping a flogging.
Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
Sounds like your a bit bitter there bradman, I think that you being the individual glory seeker that you are expected to win and poll votes in those games. Better luck next year
by carey » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:31 pm
Keepitreal wrote:carey wrote:thought it was a piss poor turn out by most clubs did clubs not back there blokes in ????????
Don't put any credence in the medal count, from what I have seen again of umpires decisions on the field and comments on here by others through out the season as to their performance, no one seems to think they know what they are doing either, so why would we hang with bated breath on votes determined by people we have no faith in for any other decisions to decide who is a division best overall player, for me thanks but no thanks.
Have already fully backed our players in our club medal count.
by carey » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:32 pm
Felch wrote:carey wrote:thought it was a piss poor turn out by most clubs did clubs not back there blokes in ????????
Maybe the word got around that 20-odd Paralowie blokes were going to be there, and it would be too crowded...
by Keepitreal » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:48 pm
Bradman wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:Gee didnt realise we all get votes and medals for effort!
Its for the BEST 3 PLAYERS on the ground and in my opinion you would find it hard to pick 1 from a side getting flogged like that
So if a bloke racks up a million possies, clearly wins his position, runs hard all day, is at the bottom of every pack and his team loses by a mountain load you wouldnt give him a vote? i wouldnt give a bloke a sympathy vote but if i felt he deserved it i would. then again im not an ump and i dont know how they think
exactly
if you had a guy doing this you would have more than 2 scoring shots
by selion » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:54 pm
by Bradman » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:54 pm
by TEX07 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:14 pm
by Bradman » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:25 pm
TEX07 wrote:You can have quality players from a losing side, but are they among the best three players on the ground? If they play better than the top three in the wining side then they deserve the vote. If a side wins by 30 plus goals i would suggest that the best 3 players on the ground would normally come from the winning side. Giving one vote to the best player from the losing side seems like a charity vote to me unless they were one of the best three on the ground.
by Keepitreal » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:40 pm
Bradman wrote:TEX07 wrote:You can have quality players from a losing side, but are they among the best three players on the ground? If they play better than the top three in the wining side then they deserve the vote. If a side wins by 30 plus goals i would suggest that the best 3 players on the ground would normally come from the winning side. Giving one vote to the best player from the losing side seems like a charity vote to me unless they were one of the best three on the ground.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:41 pm
Keepitreal wrote:Bradman wrote:TEX07 wrote:You can have quality players from a losing side, but are they among the best three players on the ground? If they play better than the top three in the wining side then they deserve the vote. If a side wins by 30 plus goals i would suggest that the best 3 players on the ground would normally come from the winning side. Giving one vote to the best player from the losing side seems like a charity vote to me unless they were one of the best three on the ground.
Also agree & main thing to consider in all of this, is that it's the umpires interpretation of best and as they struggle interpreting our great games rules every Saturday, how the hell can they pick and interpret a top 3 in a game
by Jabber » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:52 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Bradman wrote:How a side can be outscored 31-23 to 1-1 and a player score votes from losing side is a disgrace
the amount of times i saw this last night throughout the grades was mind boggling to say the least! No disrespect to the guys that won medals but geez takes some shine off if you ask me!
I dont agree, i think its good the umpires notice the efforts of an individual especially if his side is copping a flogging.
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:19 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |