SAAFL C1-C6 2008

[gothebombers]

lk am i gonna catch you at the heccies trial....im not coaching the c s this year

[LaughingKookaburra]

lk am i gonna catch you at the heccies trial....im not coaching the c s this year

All depends on my work my friend.My best games last year were against Hectorville.had a couple of good 1 on 1s with that bloke at full back.Kicked 7 in the 2 games and played across halfback in the final.

[gothebombers]

lk am i gonna catch you at the heccies trial....im not coaching the c s this year

All depends on my work my friend.My best games last year were against Hectorville.had a couple of good 1 on 1s with that bloke at full back.Kicked 7 in the 2 games and played across halfback in the final.

the ball didnt go in your forward lines in the final last year,,, sorry two times...... you had a good bunch of guys,,, esp kon , is he still playing

[finn]

thers going to be a bit of space in the c1 c2 comp i believe as what i was reading in the div 7 forum if this is correct, so im guessing the a grade teams should really be in c1 or c2 to be even and fair. ovies will do ok in c1 or 2. prob do very well any lower

Thats pretty much what i heard Wingfield,Ovingham and Rosewater to c2.Heard Rosewater sruggling 4 numbers and may go just 1 side but nut sure only rumour i heard,could b way off the mark.Id still say Ovies will win c2 from what i seen the other night,they trained like a div 4/5 side,got some good players so as you said you wouldnt think they would go any lower

right on the mark wattle, ovis would do well in c2 and would do ok in c1. hope mark and his meery men and kylie get it right at ammy house.

c2 is about the same standard as c1 going on the team who won it last year (shoc) and modbury. we (uni) played both of these sides the year before in div 8 and both were very similar in standard to last year's goodwood (runners up) and tea tree gully (3rd) sides.
curious as to whether the ovingham side is better than their 'gun' side of 2004 and 2000.
personally i'd stick all a grades sides in div 7, let the a's pay forfeit fees until the clubs concerned produce a b grade side as i feel its an easy option to sit down low and play c grade sides with an a grade team and really gives the clubs concerned no real incentive to get the second side.

[gothebombers]

hope your not working , well have a beer, bourbon together. dont know if im playing

[gothebombers]

finn , have a look at div 7 forum if you havent already. tell me what you think. have you seen the gradings yet or do you know how anyone is coming up with these grades noms

[wattle]

Talking to a couple of players that played in ovinghams 04 flag,and they rate this list to b better,if they gel and play as good or better only time will tell.Howgood was there 04 side?

[LaughingKookaburra]

thers going to be a bit of space in the c1 c2 comp i believe as what i was reading in the div 7 forum if this is correct, so im guessing the a grade teams should really be in c1 or c2 to be even and fair. ovies will do ok in c1 or 2. prob do very well any lower

Thats pretty much what i heard Wingfield,Ovingham and Rosewater to c2.Heard Rosewater sruggling 4 numbers and may go just 1 side but nut sure only rumour i heard,could b way off the mark.Id still say Ovies will win c2 from what i seen the other night,they trained like a div 4/5 side,got some good players so as you said you wouldnt think they would go any lower

right on the mark wattle, ovis would do well in c2 and would do ok in c1. hope mark and his meery men and kylie get it right at ammy house.

c2 is about the same standard as c1 going on the team who won it last year (shoc) and modbury. we (uni) played both of these sides the year before in div 8 and both were very similar in standard to last year's goodwood (runners up) and tea tree gully (3rd) sides.
curious as to whether the ovingham side is better than their 'gun' side of 2004 and 2000.
personally i'd stick all a grades sides in div 7, let the a's pay forfeit fees until the clubs concerned produce a b grade side as i feel its an easy option to sit down low and play c grade sides with an a grade team and really gives the clubs concerned no real incentive to get the second side.

Dunno finn, at least people are playing the game.rather see a side playing C1,C2 and playing within their depth than going upto div 7 with 1 side and getting thumped.Could put their club into extinction.What ever happened to the old saying "Though I aim to defeat you, if I do I will not humiliate you because for with out you I would be a lesser man".Unless they are being cocky p****s and rubbing your nose in it.

[LaughingKookaburra]

Talking to a couple of players that played in ovinghams 04 flag,and they rate this list to b better,if they gel and play as good or better only time will tell.Howgood was there 04 side?

How can you rate it to be better than a premiership side, havent played a game yet. Getting ahead of yourself already if true...........

[LaughingKookaburra]

Talking to a couple of players that played in ovinghams 04 flag,and they rate this list to b better,if they gel and play as good or better only time will tell.Howgood was there 04 side?

How can you rate it to be better than a premiership side, havent played a game yet. Getting ahead of yourself already if true...........I know you did not quote it btw

Oooopppps,to many hours at work

[finn]

finn , have a look at div 7 forum if you havent already. tell me what you think. have you seen the gradings yet or do you know how anyone is coming up with these grades noms

waiting impatiently for the gradings to emerge from tynte street. usually there is a prospective seeding list out in january and then the horse trading begins. i'm hoping that out football co-ordinator has a copy that i can take a peek at.

i've had a look at the div 7 forum and think that according to the old way the gradings were done that it is fine - but the saafl made such a big deal that the c grade divisions would reflect the a and b grade last year (and supposedly this year) that they've left themselves little room to manoeuvre. if smosh etc are going to bypass c2 and head into div 7 then i believe that c1 should then be the best of the rest with a promotion/relegation system from c6 up and get rid off the reflective nature of the saafl programming. in this case the uni side i coach should head back up to c1 and defend the flag we won last year.

personally i like the system from last year with its ability for district based clubs to have triple headers and help pull the club together. i personally only had this opportunity to watch our a grade and they got to see a different brand of approach to the game as well.

[trev]

Go the bombers, I run around with Hope Valley in C5. That is when i manage to get my weary bones onto the park!

[gothebombers]

good man trev, may catch up with u, if your old bones can handle it

[gothebombers]

i dont suppose anyone has seen the proposed gradings for the lower grades yet

[wattle]

i dont suppose anyone has seen the proposed gradings for the lower grades yet

no havent seen anything,heard it may b going back to the old div8,9 and 10 instead of c'4,5,6 more sides in div7 this year means less sides in c2?when do grades come out?

[Bold Strategy]

i dont suppose anyone has seen the proposed gradings for the lower grades yet

no havent seen anything,heard it may b going back to the old div8,9 and 10 instead of c'4,5,6 more sides in div7 this year means less sides in c2?when do grades come out?

saw in the newspaper ovingham had an add that said div 10 in it?? not sure if you can get anything out of that???

[finn]

team gradings as follows
c1
port districts
salisbury north
seaton ramblers
broadview
gepps cross
rostrevor
goodwood
gaza
tea tree gully
adelaide uni

c2
edwardstown
wingfield
payneham
scotch
ovingham
north pines
pembroke
modbury
phos camden
adelaide uni

c3
as div 3

c4
pulteney
fitzroy
adelaide lutheran
portland
mitcham
paoc
pooraka
unley
north haven
uni

c5
ingle farm
tea tree gully
golden grove
kenilworth
bye
hectorville
mitcham
modbury
hope valley
uni

c2 should see some fireworks

[gothebombers]

finn, is this the word fr saafl. . a few 4th teams in c5 and no c6.?

[finn]

finn, is this the word fr saafl. . a few 4th teams in c5 and no c6.?

as given out at last nights saafl delegate meeting c5 is now the bottom grade

[gothebombers]

very interesting,,,,good to see the A grade sides in c2, better for all. i wonder what uni team itll be. itll prob change anyway ,it always does. was told ingle farm may not have a c gr?