MightyEagles wrote:If we don't fall in a heap batting wise, it should be a win.
Chasing this target will not be that easy...
Hopefully we can get them all out soon to minimise the target and maximise the overs!
by RoosterMarty » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:52 am
MightyEagles wrote:If we don't fall in a heap batting wise, it should be a win.
by MADDOG3 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:53 am
by MightyEagles » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:55 am
RoosterMarty wrote:MightyEagles wrote:If we don't fall in a heap batting wise, it should be a win.
Chasing this target will not be that easy...
Hopefully we can get them all out soon to minimise the target and maximise the overs!
by blink » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:56 am
by MADDOG3 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:58 am
by tedbullpit » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:04 pm
MADDOG3 wrote:Are we capable of chasing 220-240 in two sessions though? I can't say I have faith in us scoring quickly without losing regular wickets.
Vics ton-up. 7/100
by toot toot » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:05 pm
tedbullpit wrote:MADDOG3 wrote:Are we capable of chasing 220-240 in two sessions though? I can't say I have faith in us scoring quickly without losing regular wickets.
Vics ton-up. 7/100
Not without Boof!
by Rik E Boy » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:06 pm
CoverKing wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Should have fought for the two points. Got to start getting a winning culture happening. Make them bowl you out. Imagine the boost the group could have gotten for overhauling the Bushrangers' total. A lot of teams will get a donut out of the Vic game.
Of course if the Backs clean up today I'm going to look silly LOL. Or should that be sillier?
regards,
REB
that is definitely sillier REB...no question about it! but i agree with u the 2 points were up for grab the six points are not, we let it slip i believe
by RoosterMarty » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:22 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:27 pm
by tedbullpit » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:31 pm
by MADDOG3 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:33 pm
tedbullpit wrote:Surely they wont open up with Harris & Plant? Guessing we will need 260 off of about 70 overs. Need to get some aggression up the order if we are any chance. Manou should take a risk and chuck himself in at the top.
by MADDOG3 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:34 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:36 pm
by jackpot jim » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:38 pm
by blink » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:39 pm
MADDOG3 wrote:tedbullpit wrote:Surely they wont open up with Harris & Plant? Guessing we will need 260 off of about 70 overs. Need to get some aggression up the order if we are any chance. Manou should take a risk and chuck himself in at the top.
I like that, either him or Klinger. I couldn't see Manou lasting too long though... last thing we need is an early wicket.
by RoosterMarty » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:44 pm
blink wrote:MADDOG3 wrote:tedbullpit wrote:Surely they wont open up with Harris & Plant? Guessing we will need 260 off of about 70 overs. Need to get some aggression up the order if we are any chance. Manou should take a risk and chuck himself in at the top.
I like that, either him or Klinger. I couldn't see Manou lasting too long though... last thing we need is an early wicket.
Gee Younis would have been handy today...instead he was wasting his time playing a T20 against Canada!
by CoverKing » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:45 pm
by tedbullpit » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:50 pm
CoverKing wrote:What about Cleary to open second dig and plant drop down? cleary opens for his local side and is known to score quickly? harris can play the defensive and attacking mode if needed...i think its a good switch to the top of the order
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |