by redandblack » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:09 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:29 am
redandblack wrote:I haven't seen the Watto thing yet, but there was a time when there were no match referees and 99.9% of players went through their career without ever needing disciplinary action.
All players should read the preamble to the rules and if they transgress more than once, they should lose 100% of their match fee and be suspended for games.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:30 am
jackpot jim wrote:Even tho Aust look like winning, MAL was right.
Aust 1 - 0 up in the series.
Only 1/2 way thru day 2 with fine weather forecast.
Ponting Surely would have thought Aust would have a 2nd Inngs
SO, the question remains,
Why did he declare??????
Aust bowled out for a WOEFUL 150 in the 2nd Inngs, Obviously well short of what he would have liked to have set the Windies.
IF the Windies happen to fluke the last 50 odd runs and win, it will go down as one the biggest blunders of all time, losing a test after only losing 17 wickets.
Could understand the declaration if Aust were 0 - 1 down or 1 - 1 going into the test to ensure time to win .
My prediction - Aust to win series 2 - 0
My Ratings - Aust 5.5/10 barely a pass. Windies 7/10 Very creditable performance after 1st test flogging.
Ratings based on consideration to their current Test ranking.
BUT, IF the windies were to pull off a miracle win, well, well, well, Ponting may very well be asked to give the job away.
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:41 am
by The Cadet » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:45 am
by Rik E Boy » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:54 am
The Cadet wrote:Who will come in for Ponting If he dosnt come up
by mal » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:05 am
Rik E Boy wrote:jackpot jim wrote:Even tho Aust look like winning, MAL was right.
Aust 1 - 0 up in the series.
Only 1/2 way thru day 2 with fine weather forecast.
Ponting Surely would have thought Aust would have a 2nd Inngs
SO, the question remains,
Why did he declare??????
Aust bowled out for a WOEFUL 150 in the 2nd Inngs, Obviously well short of what he would have liked to have set the Windies.
IF the Windies happen to fluke the last 50 odd runs and win, it will go down as one the biggest blunders of all time, losing a test after only losing 17 wickets.
Could understand the declaration if Aust were 0 - 1 down or 1 - 1 going into the test to ensure time to win .
My prediction - Aust to win series 2 - 0
My Ratings - Aust 5.5/10 barely a pass. Windies 7/10 Very creditable performance after 1st test flogging.
Ratings based on consideration to their current Test ranking.
BUT, IF the windies were to pull off a miracle win, well, well, well, Ponting may very well be asked to give the job away.
Maybe you can take a break from your Aussies bashing to have a real look at what has happened in this match. It is not the declaration that was woeful, but Australia's second innings. If the West Indies get the runs it doesn't go down as a tactical blunder by the captain but just plain old bad batting.
We aren't as good as we used to be and there a lot of posters on this site that need to get over it. Our test ranking is what, four at the moment so your ratings a bogus.
regards,
REB
by mal » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:12 am
redandblack wrote:I haven't seen the Watto thing yet, but there was a time when there were no match referees and 99.9% of players went through their career without ever needing disciplinary action.
All players should read the preamble to the rules and if they transgress more than once, they should lose 100% of their match fee and be suspended for games.
by jackpot jim » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:13 am
Rik E Boy wrote:jackpot jim wrote:Even tho Aust look like winning, MAL was right.
Aust 1 - 0 up in the series.
Only 1/2 way thru day 2 with fine weather forecast.
Ponting Surely would have thought Aust would have a 2nd Inngs
SO, the question remains,
Why did he declare??????
Aust bowled out for a WOEFUL 150 in the 2nd Inngs, Obviously well short of what he would have liked to have set the Windies.
IF the Windies happen to fluke the last 50 odd runs and win, it will go down as one the biggest blunders of all time, losing a test after only losing 17 wickets.
Could understand the declaration if Aust were 0 - 1 down or 1 - 1 going into the test to ensure time to win .
My prediction - Aust to win series 2 - 0
My Ratings - Aust 5.5/10 barely a pass. Windies 7/10 Very creditable performance after 1st test flogging.
Ratings based on consideration to their current Test ranking.
BUT, IF the windies were to pull off a miracle win, well, well, well, Ponting may very well be asked to give the job away.
Maybe you can take a break from your Aussies bashing to have a real look at what has happened in this match. It is not the declaration that was woeful, but Australia's second innings. If the West Indies get the runs it doesn't go down as a tactical blunder by the captain but just plain old bad batting.
We aren't as good as we used to be and there a lot of posters on this site that need to get over it. Our test ranking is what, four at the moment so your ratings a bogus.
regards,
REB
by cripple » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:27 am
Rik E Boy wrote:The Cadet wrote:Who will come in for Ponting If he dosnt come up
Rogers with Watto to slide into the number 3 spot.
regards,
REB
by Pup » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:42 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Maybe you can take a break from your Aussies bashing to have a real look at what has happened in this match. It is not the declaration that was woeful, but Australia's second innings. If the West Indies get the runs it doesn't go down as a tactical blunder by the captain but just plain old bad batting.
We aren't as good as we used to be and there a lot of posters on this site that need to get over it. Our test ranking is what, four at the moment so your ratings a bogus.
regards,
REB
by Aerie » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:01 am
by Thiele » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:59 am
by Dogwatcher » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:51 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:55 pm
mal wrote:I have not seen the incident either
I dont know if I wanna see it as well
I can imagine it though
Recent on feild success in the Test arena does not make it permissable to send off an opponent
It happened to me in a final in the 90s
I made 15 , from the time I got out to the time I was half way off the oval, I was subjected to a a disgusting and very personal verbal spray
It was one of the lowest dispicable things Ive ever experienced on a cricket field
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:02 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:08 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:13 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:17 pm
by cripple » Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |