by Punk Rooster » Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:06 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:14 pm
by am Bays » Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:17 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:15 pm
by Aerie » Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:06 pm
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:11 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:32 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Symonds has taken his chance andf has booked a spot for a few more tests.
The selectors want to play an all-rounder in many ways he is a better bet than Watson becasue he has proved at both shield annd one-day level he is a better bat than watson and his bowling is more than usefull for a second change bowler 130 km/h moves it around and can bowl spin when required.
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:06 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote: Plus I heard a whisper that had Symonds failed in this match the selectors may have gone the option of a "spinner-allrounder". That means they were seriously considering White from Victoria. God forbid.
by mal » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:38 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote: Plus I heard a whisper that had Symonds failed in this match the selectors may have gone the option of a "spinner-allrounder". That means they were seriously considering White from Victoria. God forbid.
____________________________________________________________________________
Christ, they really must be obsessed with having an all rounder in the team.
What's the point of having an allrounder in the team though if he's only going to average 25 with the bat and 40 with the ball.
by mal » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:41 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:57 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:09 pm
look at Ponting, Hussey (currently averaging a million), Clarke, the Poms....mighty_tiger_79 wrote:anyone could have made runs on that pitch, i mean look at hayden!!!!!!!!
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by mal » Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:10 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:anyone could have made runs on that pitch, i mean look at hayden!!!!!!!!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:15 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:look at Ponting, Hussey (currently averaging a million), Clarke, the Poms....mighty_tiger_79 wrote:anyone could have made runs on that pitch, i mean look at hayden!!!!!!!!
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:43 pm
mal wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote: Plus I heard a whisper that had Symonds failed in this match the selectors may have gone the option of a "spinner-allrounder". That means they were seriously considering White from Victoria. God forbid.
____________________________________________________________________________
Christ, they really must be obsessed with having an all rounder in the team.
What's the point of having an allrounder in the team though if he's only going to average 25 with the bat and 40 with the ball.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dosent matter if we pick the 5th bowling allrounder now because Australia
is simply the best team by a minute.
But we will need it after this series
Thats when you need the number 6 to ave 25 with bat 40 with ball
He saves plenty in the field
Cast your eye to the future , Simmo is the ideal player in the subcontinent
as a spinner, greatest fielder in the galaxy, and to hit sixes on the postage
stamp arenas, and will be needed there because Ponting usually FAILS there
AH/SYD-DOG and I have always maintained faith in Simmo
VOTE
I Simmo
2 Howard
3 Rudd
by Thiele » Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:49 pm
by mal » Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:52 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:mal wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote: Plus I heard a whisper that had Symonds failed in this match the selectors may have gone the option of a "spinner-allrounder". That means they were seriously considering White from Victoria. God forbid.
____________________________________________________________________________
Christ, they really must be obsessed with having an all rounder in the team.
What's the point of having an allrounder in the team though if he's only going to average 25 with the bat and 40 with the ball.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dosent matter if we pick the 5th bowling allrounder now because Australia
is simply the best team by a minute.
But we will need it after this series
Thats when you need the number 6 to ave 25 with bat 40 with ball
He saves plenty in the field
Cast your eye to the future , Simmo is the ideal player in the subcontinent
as a spinner, greatest fielder in the galaxy, and to hit sixes on the postage
stamp arenas, and will be needed there because Ponting usually FAILS there
AH/SYD-DOG and I have always maintained faith in Simmo
VOTE
I Simmo
2 Howard
3 Rudd
BTW Mal, that wasn't a crack at Symonds (even though I know his averages probably ATM fall into the category), it's just that all these fringe all rounders you here being talked up should be able to hold a spot in the side based on their batting or bowling alone, not just because they can do a bit of both.
by Ian » Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:08 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Is that enough to give him a Test spot?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |