Gillard for PM?

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Gozu » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:39 pm

Lets not forget the union's have given us the 8 hour working day, great wages, rights for employees and equality for women.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13853
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 681 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby fish » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:56 pm

Congratulations Julia Gillard, our first ever female Prime Minister. =D>

Sworn in today by our first ever (I believe) female Governor General! =D>
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby sherminator » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:20 pm

wycbloods wrote:
Squawk wrote:
Booney wrote:Like the country needs Unions running it.


Wake up Booney - that's always been the case with Labor. I noticed that Gillard's speech carefully crafted in a lot of heed to the unions, to workers, and the old scare campaign of Work Choices is being rolled out again. Gillard wants the miner's to cut their mining ads in a show of good faith. I bet that Labor dont cut any pre-election ads that refer to work choices.


Why should they? Abbott has put workchoices, whatever name he wants to call it, firmly back on the agenda.


It's interesting that Labor got back in to power on the back of the public's objection to WorkChoices thanks to the ACTU's 'Your Rights at Work' campaign. Rudd & Gillard made the promise that they would 'tear up and bury' WorkChoices and replace it with the FairWork Act. To me that suggested they would return our IR system back to the same as before WorkChoices. In reality, the FairWork Act is just a scaled down version of WorkChoices with a more voter friendly name. The only major change was getting rid of AWA's (which were around before WorkChoices anyway). There are a number of initiatives from WorkChoices that still remain in the FairWork Act just with different names! So I don't think Industrial Relations will play as much of a role as it did at the previous election. I would imagine it would be one issue Abbott would tread carefully around. It would be good though to get Costello back as his right hand man! The Abbott & Costello act would be worth a chuckle!
sherminator
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:14 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Olympic Dam

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby White Line Fever » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:46 pm

Gozu wrote:Lets not forget the union's have given us the 8 hour working day, great wages, rights for employees and equality for women.


Let's not forget 4 weeks annual leave, 38 hour week, 36 hour week, continual pay rises, protection and security of your job.
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby am Bays » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:01 pm

OK now she's done the job on Kevin, can she handle the big challenge - picking the PMs XI!!! I'm tipping Andrew McDonald as the captain next year....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19760
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2129 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Squawk » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:05 pm

am Bays wrote:OK now she's done the job on Kevin, can she handle the big challenge - picking the PMs XI!!! I'm tipping Andrew McDonald as the captain next year....

=)) =)) =))

At least a few South Aussies might get selected too.

FWIW I'm not convinced that picking the PM's XI was the most natural thing for Rudd either. And while Howard lacked any physical prowess as a bowler (who can ever forget that bowling vision of him :D ) he did and does love the game.
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby White Line Fever » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:24 am

Squawk wrote:
am Bays wrote:OK now she's done the job on Kevin, can she handle the big challenge - picking the PMs XI!!! I'm tipping Andrew McDonald as the captain next year....

=)) =)) =))

At least a few South Aussies might get selected too.

FWIW I'm not convinced that picking the PM's XI was the most natural thing for Rudd either. And while Howard lacked any physical prowess as a bowler (who can ever forget that bowling vision of him :D ) he did and does love the game.


Isn't Howard in the running for ICC Presidency?
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby wycbloods » Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:32 pm

sherminator wrote:
wycbloods wrote:
Squawk wrote:
Booney wrote:Like the country needs Unions running it.


Wake up Booney - that's always been the case with Labor. I noticed that Gillard's speech carefully crafted in a lot of heed to the unions, to workers, and the old scare campaign of Work Choices is being rolled out again. Gillard wants the miner's to cut their mining ads in a show of good faith. I bet that Labor dont cut any pre-election ads that refer to work choices.


Why should they? Abbott has put workchoices, whatever name he wants to call it, firmly back on the agenda.


It's interesting that Labor got back in to power on the back of the public's objection to WorkChoices thanks to the ACTU's 'Your Rights at Work' campaign. Rudd & Gillard made the promise that they would 'tear up and bury' WorkChoices and replace it with the FairWork Act. To me that suggested they would return our IR system back to the same as before WorkChoices. In reality, the FairWork Act is just a scaled down version of WorkChoices with a more voter friendly name. The only major change was getting rid of AWA's (which were around before WorkChoices anyway). There are a number of initiatives from WorkChoices that still remain in the FairWork Act just with different names! So I don't think Industrial Relations will play as much of a role as it did at the previous election. I would imagine it would be one issue Abbott would tread carefully around. It would be good though to get Costello back as his right hand man! The Abbott & Costello act would be worth a chuckle!


As someone who works with the Fair Work Act on a daily basis i can guarantee you it is vastly different to Workchoices. I agree it hasn't gone far enough back the other way :D but i think it has met most of the public's expectations that was built up through the YR@W campaign.

The ABCC is the most significant piece of WorkChoices legislation that has not been abolished. It is a disgusting piece of legislation and something this government needs to change NOW!
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Squawk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:22 pm

wycbloods wrote:
Squawk wrote:
Booney wrote:Like the country needs Unions running it.


Wake up Booney - that's always been the case with Labor. I noticed that Gillard's speech carefully crafted in a lot of heed to the unions, to workers, and the old scare campaign of Work Choices is being rolled out again. Gillard wants the miner's to cut their mining ads in a show of good faith.I bet that Labor dont cut any pre-election ads that refer to work choices.


Why should they? Abbott has put workchoices, whatever name he wants to call it, firmly back on the agenda.


Genuine question wyc (and others).
The ACTU and co have had great electoral success in branding workchoices (the term) as unAustralian and anti-worker. That term applied to a legislative product, which has since been amended. The way things look now, the ACTU will forever leverage off their electoral success brand any Liberal IR policy as a variation of workchoices, no matter how close, or how distant, or even if it bears any resemblance whatsoever, to the original product. So if the Coalition had to "cement" a commitment to not bring back workchoices to demonstrate that it is dead, what do you think it would take to convince the ACTU and others that it is genuinely dead as the Coalition asserts that it is?

The only thing I can think of is some sort of GST-like legislation. The GST can only be varied with 100% approval of states and territories. If they passed say 50 minimum standards and said they cant be varied without such an approval, would that bury the workchoices fervour? Even then, I doubt it would as when inevitably no 51 comes around for debate, if it wasn't amended into such a piece of legislation the workchoices taunts would start again.

Would like to hear your perspective(s).
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Media Park » Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:00 pm

Well.

One sure thing to come out of this...

I will be voting Liberal... Bring on TANK ABBOTT
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Gozu » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:10 pm

If you're going to vote for Abbott over Gillard I think it's fair to say you were probably voting for Abbott anyway. I think the public will do otherwise, they just don't put lunatics in the big chair (which is why Abbott's polls are terrible).

Squawk, I agree that the Labor Party/union's will now always run a big scare campaign on what the Libs might potentially do in government in respect to IR but you've only got one person to blame for that, John Howard. I knew how extreme Howard was deep down and said at the time when the Libs got control of the Senate that it would be enough rope for Howard to hang himself. He couldn't help himself. You might disagree but John Howard was one of the worst things to ever happen to the Liberal Party.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13853
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 681 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Strawb » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:57 pm

Gozu wrote:If you're going to vote for Abbott over Gillard I think it's fair to say you were probably voting for Abbott anyway. I think the public will do otherwise, they just don't put lunatics in the big chair (which is why Abbott's polls are terrible).

Squawk, I agree that the Labor Party/union's will now always run a big scare campaign on what the Libs might potentially do in government in respect to IR but you've only got one person to blame for that, John Howard. I knew how extreme Howard was deep down and said at the time when the Libs got control of the Senate that it would be enough rope for Howard to hang himself. He couldn't help himself. You might disagree but John Howard was one of the worst things to ever happen to the Liberal Party.

Howard did more back flips and the biggest back flip of all remember he promised no GST now what do we have
I am the Voice Left From Drinking
Strawb
Coach
 
 
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:16 pm
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Wingfield Royals

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Leaping Lindner » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:51 pm

They weren't back flips. They were core and non-core promises. :roll:
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Sojourner » Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:19 pm

Gozu wrote:Lets not forget the union's have given us the 8 hour working day, great wages, rights for employees and equality for women.


What I would like to know is why they stopped at the 38hr week? Given that in France and other places around the world the working week is being reduced to 35 hrs, I do feel its time once again for the unions to stand up on the same issue and get a better deal for all workers for the same wages as they once did so well!
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Squawk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:28 pm

Sojourner wrote:
Gozu wrote:Lets not forget the union's have given us the 8 hour working day, great wages, rights for employees and equality for women.


What I would like to know is why they stopped at the 38hr week?


They didn't complain when the Govt lifted the retirement age recently.

Who has the luxury of a 38hr week these days, anyway? ;)
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby White Line Fever » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:06 pm

Squawk wrote:
Sojourner wrote:
Gozu wrote:Lets not forget the union's have given us the 8 hour working day, great wages, rights for employees and equality for women.


What I would like to know is why they stopped at the 38hr week?


They didn't complain when the Govt lifted the retirement age recently.

Who has the luxury of a 38hr week these days, anyway? ;)


i get 38hour week, but work 60 a week anyway (gives me more time to post on here), and bank them, so effectively get 6 weeks AL!
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Old Dog New Tricks » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:15 am

Apart from having a head like a robber's dog she couldn't lead a rat up a drain pipe.
Old Dog New Tricks
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:57 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Interceptor » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:15 am

You can't make this stuff up...

Kevin Rudd's nephew to challenge Julia Gillard in her seat of Lalor:

In an ironic twist to this week's political deposing of former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a close relative representing the Revolutionary Socialist Party has announced he will challenge new PM Julia Gillard in her Victorian seat of Lalor.


No hope of course.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2989
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 25 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Old Dog New Tricks » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:20 am

Lets not forget she hasn't been voted in but sits in the chair because of some else's' downfall - which she orchestrated.
Old Dog New Tricks
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:57 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Gillard for PM?

Postby Q. » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:46 am

Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Lets not forget she hasn't been voted in but sits in the chair because of some else's' downfall - which she orchestrated.


You might want to check up on that one.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |