by am Bays » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:49 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:54 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Ian » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:09 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:30 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Dunno- carrying on about KP having short hair was pathetic, does the length of his hair really have anything to do with the issue?
by mal » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:18 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Dunno- carrying on about KP having short hair was pathetic, does the length of his hair really have anything to do with the issue?
Agree totally. If that is the best someone can come up with they should keep their mouths shut. If anything his hair was more embarrassing in 2005 when it looked like he had been shat on by a couple of seagulls.
Seriously leave the bloke alone. He is the best thing going for English cricket yet as always people love to sink the boot in when the side isn't winning. If England were up in the series he would probably be knighted on his return to England and the English press would surely claim there was no doubt he is English through and through. The guy is a star and will become a fine Test cricketer if he hasn't already achieved this. One good thing about all of it is that he doesn't seem like the sort of bloke to let it bother him and good for him.
by rod_rooster » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:19 pm
mal wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Dunno- carrying on about KP having short hair was pathetic, does the length of his hair really have anything to do with the issue?
Agree totally. If that is the best someone can come up with they should keep their mouths shut. If anything his hair was more embarrassing in 2005 when it looked like he had been shat on by a couple of seagulls.
Seriously leave the bloke alone. He is the best thing going for English cricket yet as always people love to sink the boot in when the side isn't winning. If England were up in the series he would probably be knighted on his return to England and the English press would surely claim there was no doubt he is English through and through. The guy is a star and will become a fine Test cricketer if he hasn't already achieved this. One good thing about all of it is that he doesn't seem like the sort of bloke to let it bother him and good for him.
AGREE 100%
refer 5th test in england + 2nd test in adelaide
by Rik E Boy » Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:48 am
by Blue Boy » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:04 pm
Aerie wrote:Who's Michael Henderson? Who cares....
by Max » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:08 pm
by mal » Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:34 pm
Max wrote:I agree. The guy is a champion. I would like to see him bat better with the lower order though. Perhaps the perception that he is giving the tail-enders the strike too easily is leading to this 'anti KP' banter. That aside, he has been brilliant in this (and the last) series. He still averages over 50 in test cricket after 20-odd tests. And, about half of them have been against an Australian side with Warne and McGrath!
Only the very best batsmen could match those stats...
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Max wrote:I agree. The guy is a champion. I would like to see him bat better with the lower order though. Perhaps the perception that he is giving the tail-enders the strike too easily is leading to this 'anti KP' banter. That aside, he has been brilliant in this (and the last) series. He still averages over 50 in test cricket after 20-odd tests. And, about half of them have been against an Australian side with Warne and McGrath!
Only the very best batsmen could match those stats...
by Max » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:11 pm
by Aerie » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:25 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Max wrote:I agree. The guy is a champion. I would like to see him bat better with the lower order though. Perhaps the perception that he is giving the tail-enders the strike too easily is leading to this 'anti KP' banter. That aside, he has been brilliant in this (and the last) series. He still averages over 50 in test cricket after 20-odd tests. And, about half of them have been against an Australian side with Warne and McGrath!
Only the very best batsmen could match those stats...
I don't think it is that he bats badly with the tail just that no-one in the English tail is willing or able to give support. The best player i have seen batting with the tail was Steve Waugh. His method was to give the tail the strike and trust them. KP does this but the England tail isn't up to it. He could go down the path Flintoff went this morning and not take the singles but doing that results in the sort of shot that Flintoff got out to. Bit of a catch 22 i think. Basically it is pretty hard to bat with a tail when it is as bad as the English one.
by sydney-dog » Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:56 pm
by mal » Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:07 pm
by heater31 » Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:19 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:22 pm
by sydney-dog » Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |