Round 18 - West v Central Post Match Review

[Dutchy]

Game was over after the first 15 minutes. We really need to find a ruckman.

You played against one who has been in your zone all year and the Dogs grabbed him!

[whufc]

Game was over after the first 15 minutes. We really need to find a ruckman.

You played against one who has been in your zone all year and the Dogs grabbed him!

yep apparently sutherland had spoke to collins but westies wanted to wait and see what he was like at pre season next year. central then came knocking and he couldnt resist the oppurtunity.

[doggies4eva]

Yay, one more win and the Dogs are guarenteed of playing finals in 2010

I think 11 wins guarantees us a finals berth - in fact it is probably enough for a top 3 spot. I would say 1 more win and we definitely will finish top 3.

If we want top then we probably have to beat Glenelg (unless that is the only loss we have for the rest of the minor round).

[nickname]

Game was over after the first 15 minutes. We really need to find a ruckman.

You played against one who has been in your zone all year and the Dogs grabbed him!

I don't think we were unaware of him.

[CENTURION]

Yay, one more win and the Dogs are guarenteed of playing finals in 2010

I think 11 wins guarantees us a finals berth - in fact it is probably enough for a top 3 spot. I would say 1 more win and we definitely will finish top 3.

If we want top then we probably have to beat Glenelg (unless that is the only loss we have for the rest of the minor round).

I think We will still drop 2 more games.

[Dogwatcher]

Yay, one more win and the Dogs are guarenteed of playing finals in 2010

I think 11 wins guarantees us a finals berth - in fact it is probably enough for a top 3 spot. I would say 1 more win and we definitely will finish top 3.

If we want top then we probably have to beat Glenelg (unless that is the only loss we have for the rest of the minor round).

I think We will still drop 2 more games.

In the minor round.

We need to make sure that's clarified.

[bloods08]

Yay, one more win and the Dogs are guarenteed of playing finals in 2010

I think 11 wins guarantees us a finals berth - in fact it is probably enough for a top 3 spot. I would say 1 more win and we definitely will finish top 3.

If we want top then we probably have to beat Glenelg (unless that is the only loss we have for the rest of the minor round).

I think We will still drop 2 more games.

In the minor round.

We need to make sure that's clarified.

That goes without saying. Everyboday knows you guys don't lose finals. (well not very often anyway)

[doggies4eva]

That depends how long your memory is Bloods08 - prior to 2000 I attended many losing finals

[jim5112]

How good was Ian Callinan's mark on the grandstand side wing, just after he snuck on the field through the interchange...

Mark of the Year so far I reckon...

If you were you at Richmond to see the mark where were you doing live crosses from then?

[Big Phil]

How good was Ian Callinan's mark on the grandstand side wing, just after he snuck on the field through the interchange...

Mark of the Year so far I reckon...

If you were you at Richmond to see the mark where were you doing live crosses from then?

I wasn't doing live crosses from anywhere mate, I was doing Special Comments at Richmond with LifeFM but had the laptop going to give live score updates from the other SANFL game and the AFL games going on.

I saw the mark with my own eyes mate and was very gald I did !!

[bundy]

Onya Big Phil luv ya work.

[SANFLnut]

With regard to the report of Sutherland, I did not see the moment of (alleged?) impact so I can't comment on guilty or not guilty. The reason I did not see the moment is because as a spectator I was watching the ball and following the game. The umpire has no excuse for not seeing the incident and only reacting once the West player went to ground. As the West player got rid of the ball Sutherland was moving towards him and within a metre or two, the ball was travelling up towards the centre of the ground where another umpire is in control. Surely the umpire has an obligation to keep his eyes on the player that has just disposed of the ball for an extra second or two to then be able to rule on exactly these incidents. Is this not one of the main reasons we have multiple umpires? If umpires are going to just watch the ball then we may as well have one of them. If the umpire was doing his job properly there is no way you could mistake McKenzie for Sutherland.

[Big Phil]

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29313&p=1054401#p1054401