by Squawk » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:17 am
by Q. » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:23 am
Squawk wrote:dedja wrote:Agreed, everyone is trying to find a solution to a virtually non-existent problem.
Doesn't have the same oomph to crack down on visa over-stayers.
"The problem" at the moment is a few thousand people per annum. If any of the current prevention mechanisms were withdrawn, it would balloon out further. No doubt. In fact, it could actually become a genuine 'problem' where tens of thousands descended towards Australia by boat.
by mick » Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:58 am
by fisho mcspaz » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:18 am
by am Bays » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:32 am
by fisho mcspaz » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:40 am
by am Bays » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 am
fisho mcspaz wrote:True - Kingston is safe Labor.
This is a long shot but I don't suppose there's any chance of the Greens taking Mayo?
by CK » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:49 am
fisho mcspaz wrote:True - Kingston is safe Labor.
This is a long shot but I don't suppose there's any chance of the Greens taking Mayo?
by Media Park » Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:31 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Gozu » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:45 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:04 pm
Gozu wrote:Prediction: Labor to win 80 seats (thus a reduced majority) and to take Boothby.
I always vote Greens in the Senate and this time will be voting Greens in the HoR then going through all the independents/Democrats etc, Liberal Party 3rd to last, Labor 2nd to last and Family First at the bottom.
I just don’t think voting 1) Greens and then 2) Labor will get the message across. Like Hawker, Richo etc have said during this campaign they know the vast majority of Greens votes will be coming back to them regardless which allows the ALP to continue it’s march to the Right.
This Rudd/Gillard Labor government have been disappointing in my opinion and with things like these I can’t support them:
-the mandatory internet filter
-bringing in welfare quarantining nation wide for people on unemployment & single parenting benefits
-the capitulation on climate change culminating in the farce that is/will be the citizens assembly
-the East Timor ‘solution’
-the blatant tax grab with the 25% price hike on packs of cigarettes which for the most part hurts low income earners
by Dogwatcher » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:05 pm
by redandblack » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:06 pm
by am Bays » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:13 pm
by mick » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:18 pm
by redandblack » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:23 pm
by mick » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:34 pm
redandblack wrote:mick, I've been following politics for long enough to know that if we don't know who's going to win tomorrow, we certainly can't call what's going to happen over the next several years.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:38 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Gillard to be PM, by a nose.
by Q. » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:39 pm
mick wrote:redandblack wrote:mick, I've been following politics for long enough to know that if we don't know who's going to win tomorrow, we certainly can't call what's going to happen over the next several years.
You are right of course we don't know who'll win, but I remember quite a few people were calling Abbott and the Liberal Party unelectable less than a year ago, they may may not get elected but consensus suggests it will be a close run thing. Who would have thunk it?You really believe there will be no blood letting in the ALP if they lose office? That is a certainty.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |