Dogwatcher wrote:With Nick Lower going, it seems the draft was cruel and unkind for Norwood.
Nice work, Dogwatcher.
by nickname » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:13 am
Dogwatcher wrote:With Nick Lower going, it seems the draft was cruel and unkind for Norwood.
by JK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:26 am
mal wrote:Sack BASSETT
No point having a coach that gets the very very best out of his players, and they get drafted
Sorry for feeling sulky, but the SANFL used to be a great competition
Now its simply a feeder system for the AFL
Happened to WA under REHN , and now NW under BASSETT
Very frustrating
by SpionKopster » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:27 am
mal wrote:Sack BASSETT
No point having a coach that gets the very very best out of his players, and they get drafted
Sorry for feeling sulky, but the SANFL used to be a great competition
Now its simply a feeder system for the AFL
Happened to WA under REHN , and now NW under BASSETT
Very frustrating
by sjt » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:03 am
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:whufc wrote:Norwood have been smashed
Imagine if Central had lost
Lower-Thomas
Duigan-Spurr
Pupolo-Hayes
Phillips-Callinan
Gorringe-Sutherland
Trotter-Sansbury
Weatherald-Boyd
That would kill any state side in Aus. Hard to see Norwood making the top 3 with that many changes to personnel.
When you put it that way it is actually worse than that.
If those Centrals players are as good as those Norwood players you are comparing them to, then they would also have been drafted.
by CENTURION » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:08 am
whufc wrote:Norwood have been smashed
Imagine if Central had lost
Lower-Thomas
Duigan-Spurr
Pupolo-Hayes
Phillips-Callinan
Gorringe-Sutherland
Trotter-Sansbury
Weatherald-Boyd
That would kill any state side in Aus. Hard to see Norwood making the top 3 with that many changes to personnel.
by CENTURION » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:12 am
SpionKopster wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:whufc wrote:Norwood have been smashed
Imagine if Central had lost
Lower-Thomas
Duigan-Spurr
Pupolo-Hayes
Phillips-Callinan
Gorringe-Sutherland
Trotter-Sansbury
Weatherald-Boyd
That would kill any state side in Aus. Hard to see Norwood making the top 3 with that many changes to personnel.
When you put it that way it is actually worse than that.
If those Centrals players are as good as those Norwood players you are comparing them to, then they would also have been drafted.
Norwood will make the top 3 next year.
by SpionKopster » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:32 am
by Big Phil » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:59 am
Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Phillips-Callinan
Interesting comparison, if you count Norwood as losing Phillips you have to count Central as losing Callinan surely?![]()
Dogs fans dont seem too concerned that they have potentially lost the best player in the comp for 2011?
by SpionKopster » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:11 am
by SpionKopster » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:12 am
Big Phil wrote:Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Phillips-Callinan
Interesting comparison, if you count Norwood as losing Phillips you have to count Central as losing Callinan surely?![]()
Dogs fans dont seem too concerned that they have potentially lost the best player in the comp for 2011?
Main difference being Phillips is already on the main list at the Power, Callinan, as a rookie, would need a spot on the Crows list to open up for him to be upgraded to the senior list and play AFL. Could happen round 1, could happen round 20?
That may happen, but history probably shows it doesn't until later in the season, by that time Callinan may have played a fair bit of SANFL by then, but so too may Phillips as well. It's all just a case of wait and see but potentially is the key word.
by nickname » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:43 am
SpionKopster wrote:
This isn't the first year we've been pillaged by the system, and with all due respects, we're Norwood, we're not West Adelaide, we'll hit back hard.
by Go Legs » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:52 am
nickname wrote:SpionKopster wrote:
This isn't the first year we've been pillaged by the system, and with all due respects, we're Norwood, we're not West Adelaide, we'll hit back hard.
Or perhaps that should be "we're Norwood, not West Adelaide, we'll breach the salary cap by $30,000".
by nickname » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:04 pm
by fish » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:34 pm
SpionKopster wrote:I'll be utterly flabergasted if Callinan isn't the nominated rookie at Adelaide, meaning he can be called up at any point in the season, no long term injury required for the nominated rookie to play. Surely at his age, it's a waste of time if they have no intention of playing him from the commencement of the season.
Mind you, as someone pointed out on another website, Callinan's profile doesn't fit with Craig, adventurous, risk taking, not dour, takes the game on, that's another story / conjecture regarding what Nil will decide, we'd be here for an eternity.
by JK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:14 pm
nickname wrote:SpionKopster wrote:
This isn't the first year we've been pillaged by the system, and with all due respects, we're Norwood, we're not West Adelaide, we'll hit back hard.
Or perhaps that should be "we're Norwood, not West Adelaide, we'll breach the salary cap by $30,000".
by Dutchy » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:27 pm
Big Phil wrote:Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Phillips-Callinan
Interesting comparison, if you count Norwood as losing Phillips you have to count Central as losing Callinan surely?![]()
Dogs fans dont seem too concerned that they have potentially lost the best player in the comp for 2011?
Main difference being Phillips is already on the main list at the Power, Callinan, as a rookie, would need a spot on the Crows list to open up for him to be upgraded to the senior list and play AFL. Could happen round 1, could happen round 20?
That may happen, but history probably shows it doesn't until later in the season, by that time Callinan may have played a fair bit of SANFL by then, but so too may Phillips as well. It's all just a case of wait and see but potentially is the key word.
by nickname » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:47 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:nickname wrote:SpionKopster wrote:
This isn't the first year we've been pillaged by the system, and with all due respects, we're Norwood, we're not West Adelaide, we'll hit back hard.
Or perhaps that should be "we're Norwood, not West Adelaide, we'll breach the salary cap by $30,000".
Ahh still trotting that one out lmao
by JK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:57 pm
nickname wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:nickname wrote:SpionKopster wrote:
This isn't the first year we've been pillaged by the system, and with all due respects, we're Norwood, we're not West Adelaide, we'll hit back hard.
Or perhaps that should be "we're Norwood, not West Adelaide, we'll breach the salary cap by $30,000".
Ahh still trotting that one out lmao
Just pointing out an alternative point of difference between the two clubs.
by whufc » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:02 pm
by sjt » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:08 pm
whufc wrote:Sorry my point wasnt that we wont miss Callinan more to the fact if you were to take 8 players of similar style and position it would really hurt any clubs chances.
Imho Norwood has taken the biggest hit of league players that any club has taken in recent history. It is going to be extremly hard to replace, its easy to say recruit to replace but blokes such as Lower, Pupolo, Duigan were 3 of their most important players and are Norwood men through and through.
Question?
Would you rather Lower, Pupolo, Duigan, Trotter in the side or 4 reserves players that havent played more than 10 games each of SANFL.
Its a credit to Nathan Bassett where has got Norwood as a team and Norwood players as individuals in the one year.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |