Dutchy wrote:My rankings after Rnd 2
TAS
VIC
SA
NSW
QLD
WA
My rankings depend on who is selected on the night
by mal » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:27 pm
Dutchy wrote:My rankings after Rnd 2
TAS
VIC
SA
NSW
QLD
WA
by brod » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:14 pm
mal wrote:Dutchy wrote:My rankings after Rnd 2
TAS
VIC
SA
NSW
QLD
WA
My rankings depend on who is selected on the night
by Dutchy » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:36 pm
by Johno6 » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:43 pm
by G » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:20 pm
by bayman » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:53 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:28 pm
by Pup » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:42 am
G wrote:The Vic's had to find room for Prior![]()
by Dutchy » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:48 am
by mal » Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:12 am
Dutchy wrote:Quinny gets a game when Hussey and White are in the team, when they arent he doesnt? WTF? He was one of the reasons I was confident their batting would still hold up.
by G » Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:51 pm
by overloaded » Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:30 pm
Dutchy wrote:One game in some assessments -
WA - Ordinary, Will finish dead last and might struggle to win a game IMO.
.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by mickey » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:03 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:04 pm
overloaded wrote:Dutchy wrote:One game in some assessments -
WA - Ordinary, Will finish dead last and might struggle to win a game IMO.
.
![]()
![]()
Dutchy wrote:
Tassie, very well balanced team with spin, meds, hitters and grafters. Really impressed with them in the first game in Perth and reckon they are a definate top 3 team.
Dutchy wrote:NSW -Their bowling is excellent, but they will need to be IMO as their batting is quite weak, they also field well so maybe can defend some small totals this season. Not a top 3 side though.
by mal » Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:44 pm
G wrote:OK so because I didnt play C grade on hard or matting wickets for a bum suburban club, you think Ive got no idea![]()
![]()
Have you ever heard of the term "front runners" and "pea hearted" etc and even throw in the term "chokers" and alongside of those terms is a photo of the Redbacks![]()
![]()
Also why did the Redbacks recruit Rashid ???
- He bowled 1 over for 14 and batted about 9 or 10 [what a recruit]
by G » Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:26 am
mal wrote:My ratings after round 1 :
1 Victoria
by mal » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:18 am
mal wrote:Dutchy wrote:My rankings after Rnd 2
TAS
VIC
SA
NSW
QLD
WA
My rankings depend on who is selected on the night
by mal » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:27 am
G wrote:mal wrote:My ratings after round 1 :
1 Victoria
And also "agree with the bat first system"
"Except if VICS bat 2nd, either half your bet or watch the game"
CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN these statements MAL Bradman![]()
by G » Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:07 pm
G wrote:My comment about Rashid wasnt related to his ability it was about how we used him.
He has represented England in the shorter forms of Cricket yet SA gave him 1 over and batted him so low in the 1st game![]()
![]()
Yes we recruit fairly well but SA are definitely a better and more competetive side batting first without the pressure of chasing![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |