Para Districts Cricket Association 2010-11

[Browny25]

Just picked up a load of eggs...in a seperate yard there was 3 roosters and 1 of them was raping another rooster...the poor thing was getting pumbled, as i looked into its eyes you could see it was feeling all sad and sh!t...thought of okc...that is all..

I know Friday counts as the weekend but surely you stay off the lollies until at least after 12.

Lollies? Is that a eastern park thing? Lets not go there hey...........

[Browny25]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

[whufc]

yes our player got 10 games with 20 suspended

mmmmm very interesting...........i think some of the players may even need this clairfied to them.

So with all bullsh!t aside...the player who was king hit got 10? And the player who did the king hit got? Can someone clear this sh!t up?

I think there's some mis-communication here, it's all speculation.

Agree the subject has probably run its course now until greater details are released.

[whufc]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

Spewing i was really looking forward to watching the top of the table Div 3 clash.

[Executive Member]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

Spewing i was really looking forward to watching the top of the table Div 3 clash.

that will upset Playford's B Grade side

[catchit]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

Wow it could be alook at the future with the past in mind

[Browny25]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

Wow it could be alook at the future with the past in mind

I was thinking exactly the same thing!

[OKC!]

Just picked up a load of eggs...in a seperate yard there was 3 roosters and 1 of them was raping another rooster...the poor thing was getting pumbled, as i looked into its eyes you could see it was feeling all sad and sh!t...thought of okc...that is all..

Saw some bloke hit the worst defensive push on the weekend, got caught and bowled for a DUCK, embarrassed the whole of PDCA, thought of catchit... no wait that WAS you. Well played mate.

[Lightning McQueen]

Adelaide weather now 39 tomorrow...

Chances are Elizabeth forecast will be 40?

Gee, that will stuff our A's, B's, C's and womens teams this week. All had must wins in 50/50 or better games.

[catchit]

Just picked up a load of eggs...in a seperate yard there was 3 roosters and 1 of them was raping another rooster...the poor thing was getting pumbled, as i looked into its eyes you could see it was feeling all sad and sh!t...thought of okc...that is all..

Saw some bloke hit the worst defensive push on the weekend, got caught and bowled for a DUCK, embarrassed the whole of PDCA, thought of catchit... no wait that WAS you. Well played mate.

You were embarrassed? How about the rooster? Took him 6 shots to realise it was a boy bird...
As for the shot...yes deserve everything you can think of..

[Grahaml]

yes our player got 10 games with 20 suspended

mmmmm very interesting...........i think some of the players may even need this clairfied to them.

So with all bullsh!t aside...the player who was king hit got 10? And the player who did the king hit got? Can someone clear this sh!t up?

I think there's some mis-communication here, it's all speculation.

And it's all running rampant with people spouting about how evil the association is and they don't even know the penalties!

It's all well and good to get on here saying what a mate of yours said, but the association can only go by what they got told from the witnesses at the tribunal on the night, and any written reports from witnesses. Unless you know what was said in that meeting I dare say you (like me) aren't really in a position to make much of an informed judgement.

I suggest anyone who is particularly concerned about a decision and how it was arrived at actually speaks to someone from the association, writes a letter to them, or better yet make an appearance at a delegates meeting. But just bear in mind none of the people who joined the association committee do it for their own benefit. There is no money involved, and you can't exactly serve your own needs very easily. These people give up their time (until 2am that night I hear with most working the next day) to try to make decisions that benefit the whole competition. So I think until you know the whole story, a little bit of "benefit of the doubt" should go their way.

[whufc]

yes our player got 10 games with 20 suspended

mmmmm very interesting...........i think some of the players may even need this clairfied to them.

So with all bullsh!t aside...the player who was king hit got 10? And the player who did the king hit got? Can someone clear this sh!t up?

I think there's some mis-communication here, it's all speculation.

And it's all running rampant with people spouting about how evil the association is and they don't even know the penalties!

It's all well and good to get on here saying what a mate of yours said, but the association can only go by what they got told from the witnesses at the tribunal on the night, and any written reports from witnesses. Unless you know what was said in that meeting I dare say you (like me) aren't really in a position to make much of an informed judgement.

I suggest anyone who is particularly concerned about a decision and how it was arrived at actually speaks to someone from the association, writes a letter to them, or better yet make an appearance at a delegates meeting. But just bear in mind none of the people who joined the association committee do it for their own benefit. There is no money involved, and you can't exactly serve your own needs very easily. These people give up their time (until 2am that night I hear with most working the next day) to try to make decisions that benefit the whole competition. So I think until you know the whole story, a little bit of "benefit of the doubt" should go their way.

agree with most of what you said but like i said i know as fact there is a miscommunication in what certain players believe they have been suspended for.

My main argument is the lack of common sense used, they dismiss a dated photo of injuries sustained yet will listen to witnesses and players from BOTH clubs who possibly were drinking alcohol most of the day.

Also using a bloke on the appeal board who happened to be placed with one of the sides the week before until 2am in the morning. Not saying he would be predijous but surely he would have pre concieved ideas.

[Papas]

I wrote that line to get your attention and it worked.. I dont care if PG thinks im an idiot i dont know the bloke water off a ducks back to me. Getting your attention is way more entertaining. But seriously you should have (R) written at the end of each of your come backs for repeat.

Get my attention hey...funny you say that because the other night i had to say be quiet otherwise you will get our boys attention..get ear plugs mate cause she is a wild one

You only missed one thing in that one and thats a (R).

Have you worked out a plan for S.Undries this weekend??

Are you refering to G.Hesquick? We could only wish of having your bowling record mate...then again we do..and some...and sh!tloads more some...
You should have a crack out at playford now....great oppertunity to make a name for yourself

No one on here wants to know about your bedroom antics mate this is a cricket forum. Im happy at craigmore its much more quieter.

[Grahaml]

agree with most of what you said but like i said i know as fact there is a miscommunication in what certain players believe they have been suspended for.

My main argument is the lack of common sense used, they dismiss a dated photo of injuries sustained yet will listen to witnesses and players from BOTH clubs who possibly were drinking alcohol most of the day.

Also using a bloke on the appeal board who happened to be placed with one of the sides the week before until 2am in the morning. Not saying he would be predijous but surely he would have pre concieved ideas.

Was the photo relevant to what he was appealing and the reasons for the suspension? Not being part of the process I would have no idea whether submitting the photograph is relevant, useful or not.

[Lightning McQueen]

agree with most of what you said but like i said i know as fact there is a miscommunication in what certain players believe they have been suspended for.

My main argument is the lack of common sense used, they dismiss a dated photo of injuries sustained yet will listen to witnesses and players from BOTH clubs who possibly were drinking alcohol most of the day.

Also using a bloke on the appeal board who happened to be placed with one of the sides the week before until 2am in the morning. Not saying he would be predijous but surely he would have pre concieved ideas.

Was the photo relevant to what he was appealing and the reasons for the suspension? Not being part of the process I would have no idea whether submitting the photograph is relevant, useful or not.

Photo's aren't worth a pinch of sh!t I've found, we had a club (close to you GrahamI) that refused to take the field last season because the pitch was apparently under water, we took photo's, sent them in and got nowhere.

[Executive Member]

agree with most of what you said but like i said i know as fact there is a miscommunication in what certain players believe they have been suspended for.

My main argument is the lack of common sense used, they dismiss a dated photo of injuries sustained yet will listen to witnesses and players from BOTH clubs who possibly were drinking alcohol most of the day.

Also using a bloke on the appeal board who happened to be placed with one of the sides the week before until 2am in the morning. Not saying he would be predijous but surely he would have pre concieved ideas.

Was the photo relevant to what he was appealing and the reasons for the suspension? Not being part of the process I would have no idea whether submitting the photograph is relevant, useful or not.

Photo's aren't worth a pinch of sh!t I've found, we had a club (close to you GrahamI) that refused to take the field last season because the pitch was apparently under water, we took photo's, sent them in and got nowhere.

perhaps they would acept video footage

but once again natural justice - where is it

its a joke and they need to set it up properly or it could cost them big bucks if someone ever takes it to court

[Phantom Gossiper]

No one on here wants to know about your bedroom antics mate this is a cricket forum. Im happy at craigmore its much more quieter.

Much quieter coz no one is left? everyone moved onto greener pastures?

[Phantom Gossiper]

Thats what im saying it would be fair for a team like wasley to be given a fair crack at a premiership like everyone else, i applaud them for going out each week. Its clear to everyone its not fair for playford to drop their grade 3 players to grade 8 but the PDCA dont seem to care going by all these reports of it happening before.

IMO its not all about "winnings premierships". Would much rather play for a CLUB than an individual TEAM, if we get success then good but if not then who cares, still have a hit and a giggle with some mates. I would happily play for a club like Wasleys any day of the week given the way they conduct themselves and go about things than i weak as p!ss club like playford who cant keep half their A grade in check and are happy to go win a flag in a MUCH LOWER grade.

Rather finish last in grade 4 than win a cheap flag in grade 8!

[Phantom Gossiper]

Question:- since you get 2 bonus points for winning in 20 overs and 1 bonus point for winning in 30 overs, do you get 3 bonus points for winning in 10 overs?!!?

[Lightning McQueen]

Question:- since you get 2 bonus points for winning in 20 overs and 1 bonus point for winning in 30 overs, do you get 3 bonus points for winning in 10 overs?!!?

I thought you did, I was told that I was wrong though. I might actually look the rule up.