by Browny25 » Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:51 pm
by sports follower » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:39 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:16 pm
sports follower wrote:Been very quiet on here today, the wheels of industry must be moving quicker today.
by Thats Gold » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:17 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:20 pm
Thats Gold wrote:Calm before the storm i reckon!
by Thats Gold » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:23 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Thats Gold wrote:Are the H2H's 1st innings only LM?
Correct Golden one.
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:24 pm
sports follower wrote:Been very quiet on here today, the wheels of industry must be moving quicker today.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:26 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:28 pm
catchit wrote:sports follower wrote:Been very quiet on here today, the wheels of industry must be moving quicker today.
Okc to sell more phones? Pfft probally argues with the customers about the pdca umpires..
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:28 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:32 pm
catchit wrote:Always calm on here when brahma are 5 down with 20 to get and the main man is back in the shed... Or has browny not batted yet?
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:33 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:35 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:36 pm
Grahaml wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
Sounds complicated and messy. Would mean first up that 4th place gets nothing at all, also means teams placed 4-8 at the end of the one day section sit back for 2 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for cricket to start up again, just a couple of games after the Christmas break.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:37 pm
catchit wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
A good thought...i think the oneday games are good but there is no real purpose in it as the final is a 2 dayer... Def should be looked at imo..
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:38 pm
Grahaml wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
Sounds complicated and messy. Would mean first up that 4th place gets nothing at all, also means teams placed 4-8 at the end of the one day section sit back for 2 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for cricket to start up again, just a couple of games after the Christmas break.
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:40 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:42 pm
catchit wrote:Grahaml wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:What are people's thoughts on having a seperate one-day and two-day comp like the Barossa. Everyone would still play each other in each concept.
Something like this:
Rounds 1 to 4 are 2 dayers.
Rounds 5 to 11 are 1 dayers followed by what would be round having 2nd and 3rd play off on the Saturday then the winner play the highest rank side from the 1 dayers on the Sunday.
Then follow it up with rounds 12 to 14 being two dayers and the top two play off in the GF. It would still be the same amount of weeks cricket, the only difference is that only the top 3 make the 1 day finals and top 2 make the GF of the 2 dayers.
They could amalgamate the points between the two comps to determine who would be relegated.
Just a thought
Sounds complicated and messy. Would mean first up that 4th place gets nothing at all, also means teams placed 4-8 at the end of the one day section sit back for 2 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for cricket to start up again, just a couple of games after the Christmas break.
Why cant it be the same as it is but the onday final is played on the sunday after the final round of oneday round? Then the 2 dayers start the next week,so noone is twiddling there thumbs..
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:43 pm
catchit wrote:Top 2 play off in oneday final and top 4 play off in 2 day final.
by catchit » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:45 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:catchit wrote:Always calm on here when brahma are 5 down with 20 to get and the main man is back in the shed... Or has browny not batted yet?
Will be a very interesting half an hour this Saturday.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |