by fish » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:09 pm
by redandblack » Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:05 am
by Magpiespower » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:23 am
by Squawk » Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:10 pm
Magpiespower wrote:Recent poll had Labor getting 22% primary vote.
by redandblack » Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:41 pm
by Darth Vader » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:59 pm
Squawk wrote:Magpiespower wrote:Recent poll had Labor getting 22% primary vote.
22% - that much?
So one in five people in the street would put their hands up and say they will be voting to keep NSW Labor in office, for what possible reason?
I'd be surprised if 1 in 5 would stick with Labor, but I guess that figure might be the number who would NEVER change their vote, no matter what.
by GWW » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:16 pm
by Sky Pilot » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:56 pm
GWW wrote:We've heard how bad the NSW Govt is for quite a while now.
What specifically are examples of some of its poor performance? I'm assuming examples include lack of spending on infrastructure, the infighting (including the party hacks forcing leadership changes over last few years), and the squabble over the privatisation of power assets.
by fish » Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:54 pm
by Sky Pilot » Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:59 pm
fish wrote:I believe there have been a few scandals involving Labor MP's too.
by Magpiespower » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:16 am
Christina is a hotty and I'd vote for her any day. She's cleaned out more than 20 hoons from the loop so who is to say a new mob under a sassy blonde couldn't make achiements happen? O'Farrell is boring and uninspiring.
by Magpiespower » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:20 am
GWW wrote:the squabble over the privatisation of power assets...
by CK » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:38 am
Darth Vader wrote:Squawk wrote:Magpiespower wrote:Recent poll had Labor getting 22% primary vote.
22% - that much?
So one in five people in the street would put their hands up and say they will be voting to keep NSW Labor in office, for what possible reason?
I'd be surprised if 1 in 5 would stick with Labor, but I guess that figure might be the number who would NEVER change their vote, no matter what.
Christina is a hotty and I'd vote for her any day. She's cleaned out more than 20 hoons from the loop so who is to say a new mob under a sassy blonde couldn't make achiements happen? O'Farrell is boring and uninspiring.
by Magpiespower » Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:01 am
CK wrote:Disturbingly (in terms of how they use their vote), there is a percentage of the community that would actually base their vote on that.
by Psyber » Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:52 am
Has there ever been one of those?redandblack wrote:That would be right, squawk.
History strongly suggests that figure would be much higher if it was an incompetent Liberal government.
by GWW » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:55 am
Psyber wrote:Has there ever been one of those?redandblack wrote:That would be right, squawk.
History strongly suggests that figure would be much higher if it was an incompetent Liberal government.![]()
Misguided, in some aspects of policy, has been the case at times though - e.g. Work Choices.
by Psyber » Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:11 pm
I'd forgotten him - valid point!GWW wrote:Didn't Nick Greiner have to resign due to the findings of an ICAC investigationPsyber wrote:Has there ever been one of those?redandblack wrote:That would be right, squawk.
History strongly suggests that figure would be much higher if it was an incompetent Liberal government.![]()
Misguided, in some aspects of policy, has been the case at times though - e.g. Work Choices.
by CK » Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:51 pm
by MatteeG » Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:54 pm
CK wrote:I wonder if we'd ever see our Premier trying this?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Magpiespower » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:56 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |