rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:Sorry I took so long to get back.
I was watching the WATSON innings that I taped
AU 5/346 wow
WATSON 68[69] good innings until ripped off by a poor umpiring decision
HAYDEN 181* [166] that will get his knockers shutting up for a while.
HADDIN 38[31 majestic as always a genuine talent
The rest came in with 11 overs to spare norMALly when WATSON comes in and.....
HODGE 12[10]
HUSSEY13[8]
WHITE13[8]
VOGES 16*[10] on debut well done
Could not expect much more could we.
I just hope all the WATSON critcics can see what i have been saying about
players who bat at 7 [or with 10 overs left] and what you can expect.
Did we also see the NZ 5th bowler
STYRIS+ MCcosiLLAN 10 OVERS 0/80
The 3 NZ 5TH bowlers last game 11 overs 1/120 odd![]()
I dont give a hoot anymore about whats posted
Today proved a point
a number 7 batter + 5th bowler who averages 30 is doing a good job in o/d games
And he is not a HACK.
Seriously mal, enough with the f*cking averages. Cheap wickets in junk time like Watson got on Sunday will inflate his average. A players average with the bat or ball is not a true indication of his worth. Watson does not bowl up to international standard. This has been demonstrated time and time again.
WATSON during his first over
Commentator says
" Pretty impressive stats by WATSON averaging 32 with the bat and ball
and very good economy going at less than 5 an over."
ROD you cannot possibly have it both ways
The last 2 games have been on small grounds on batting pitches
TODAY you are saying oh he made 68 on a batting pitch.....
On Sunday he took cheap wickets.....
****************ONE OF THOSE EFFORTS MUST BE GOOD.*****************
HE outscored
HODGE-HUSSEY-WHITE- today who all made less than 20...........