by Wynarka » Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:55 pm
by Goldberg » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:14 pm
grasshopper22 wrote:Heard there is a chance ladhams maybe able to line up for jervois this week. Any truth to this?
by grasshopper22 » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:26 pm
Goldberg wrote:grasshopper22 wrote:Heard there is a chance ladhams maybe able to line up for jervois this week. Any truth to this?
Cant see this happening, as it would be a massive blow to ALL COUNTRY LEAGUES, and set a precident which would have Country footy & their boards in a horrible place. FFS u did the crime Chris, stop sooking & get on with it
by RyderCourtney » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:37 pm
Goldberg wrote:grasshopper22 wrote:Heard there is a chance ladhams maybe able to line up for jervois this week. Any truth to this?
Cant see this happening, as it would be a massive blow to ALL COUNTRY LEAGUES, and set a precident which would have Country footy & their boards in a horrible place. FFS u did the crime Chris, stop sooking & get on with it
by biffboy » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:56 pm
by FootyWiz81 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:43 am
by carey » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:20 am
FootyWiz81 wrote:Has anyone even thought that maybe he is taking it to court about medical bills for Joel Kay? I doubt he would spend all court fees just to reduce his suspension, he would of already served 4?
by biffboy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:45 am
by grasshopper22 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:49 am
biffboy wrote:Wow, really? If there is any truth to all this, what happens if he has taken it to court and is allowed to play until the verdict of the hearing comes?
I would assume if still found guilty, he then has to still serve a 8 game ban which adds games to the end of the season and potentially into the finals (if they make it).
On the other hand, if found innocent it would open up a whole can of worms in regard to claims against the RMFL and perhaps him or Jervois FC seeking compensation.
Probably looking way to far into it, but this could be a very drawn out process if it does end up in the courts.
by grasshopper22 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:50 am
biffboy wrote:has anyone thought his taking it to court because he doesnt believe he did anything wrong?
by Wynarka » Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:55 pm
grasshopper22 wrote:biffboy wrote:Wow, really? If there is any truth to all this, what happens if he has taken it to court and is allowed to play until the verdict of the hearing comes?
I would assume if still found guilty, he then has to still serve a 8 game ban which adds games to the end of the season and potentially into the finals (if they make it).
On the other hand, if found innocent it would open up a whole can of worms in regard to claims against the RMFL and perhaps him or Jervois FC seeking compensation.
Probably looking way to far into it, but this could be a very drawn out process if it does end up in the courts.
Yesterdays advertiser, court listings c.ladhams v river murray football league
by slug » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:44 pm
Wynarka wrote:grasshopper22 wrote:biffboy wrote:Wow, really? If there is any truth to all this, what happens if he has taken it to court and is allowed to play until the verdict of the hearing comes?
I would assume if still found guilty, he then has to still serve a 8 game ban which adds games to the end of the season and potentially into the finals (if they make it).
On the other hand, if found innocent it would open up a whole can of worms in regard to claims against the RMFL and perhaps him or Jervois FC seeking compensation.
Probably looking way to far into it, but this could be a very drawn out process if it does end up in the courts.
Yesterdays advertiser, court listings c.ladhams v river murray football league
Any news on this? Result of the hearing was? Scary stuff, not even to many AFL clubs challenge their Tribunal in Court!
by grasshopper22 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:42 pm
Wynarka wrote:grasshopper22 wrote:biffboy wrote:Wow, really? If there is any truth to all this, what happens if he has taken it to court and is allowed to play until the verdict of the hearing comes?
I would assume if still found guilty, he then has to still serve a 8 game ban which adds games to the end of the season and potentially into the finals (if they make it).
On the other hand, if found innocent it would open up a whole can of worms in regard to claims against the RMFL and perhaps him or Jervois FC seeking compensation.
Probably looking way to far into it, but this could be a very drawn out process if it does end up in the courts.
Yesterdays advertiser, court listings c.ladhams v river murray football league
Any news on this? Result of the hearing was? Scary stuff, not even to many AFL clubs challenge their Tribunal in Court!
by biffboy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:33 pm
by GWW » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:38 pm
by grasshopper22 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:48 pm
biffboy wrote:So officially Ladhams suspension has been reduced to 4 games.
Jervois FC threatened to take the RMFL to court after his personal case against them was thrown out. Jervois and the RMFL then agreed to reduce his suspension to 4 games which means he makes his return against ramblers in a couple weeks so that will be a very interesting game, needless to say we dont expect to see him over for a beer afterwards.
Basically Jervois have held a gun to the RMFL's head and in the position they are in, the RMFL did not want to fight it. Reason being if they lost the case the RMFL could potentially end up completely broke trying to pay the court costs and the future of this league would have been put in serious jeopardy.
by LuvsFooty » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:07 pm
by nolongerthere » Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:25 am
by Dewkicker » Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:58 am
grasshopper22 wrote:biffboy wrote:So officially Ladhams suspension has been reduced to 4 games.
Jervois FC threatened to take the RMFL to court after his personal case against them was thrown out. Jervois and the RMFL then agreed to reduce his suspension to 4 games which means he makes his return against ramblers in a couple weeks so that will be a very interesting game, needless to say we dont expect to see him over for a beer afterwards.
Basically Jervois have held a gun to the RMFL's head and in the position they are in, the RMFL did not want to fight it. Reason being if they lost the case the RMFL could potentially end up completely broke trying to pay the court costs and the future of this league would have been put in serious jeopardy.
Absolute disgrace, this has opened a huge can of warms, pathetic by jervois
by true stuff » Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:24 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |