by redandblack » Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:30 pm
by Sky Pilot » Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:43 pm
redandblack wrote:SP, that sounds like an email straight from the Liberal Party?
by redandblack » Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:48 pm
by Sky Pilot » Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:57 pm
redandblack wrote:You're right, Rob's a good Westies man, SP![]()
You forgot I watched Abbott's press conference though, and your email is a straight take from that.
Mate, you should also read stories in more detail and not just headlines from Murdoch papers.
The 'school halls' program was officially reported as a major success, with only a 3% complaint rate. Murdoch's papers only headlined the 3%, of course.
by redandblack » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:21 pm
by mick » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:43 pm
by Mad Mat » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:50 pm
mick wrote:I thought Abbott did well from a political point of view, simplistic, but most off the electorate are not that bright, Julia as usual pandered to the comfortable conscience riddden middle class, who are more likely to vote Green than Labor. The carbon tax is a great opportunity for every crook and shyster to raise their prices. A sad day for our country.
by mick » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:53 pm
Mad Mat wrote:mick wrote:I thought Abbott did well from a political point of view, simplistic, but most off the electorate are not that bright, Julia as usual pandered to the comfortable conscience riddden middle class, who are more likely to vote Green than Labor. The carbon tax is a great opportunity for every crook and shyster to raise their prices. A sad day for our country.
Not according to some of the 'true believers' in this forum.
by redandblack » Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:41 pm
by cripple » Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:45 pm
by fish » Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:52 pm
Cripple you are pretty spot-on in regard to their re-election chances - here are the markets for their respective seats:cripple wrote:The most interesting press conference for me was the one with Windsor and Oakeshott, who are probably more important to this whole proces then the greens. They seem to be happy about the effort being made to reduce emissions and have also been able to see the benefits that will come in the future for their electorates with the continued development of renewable technology. I get the feeling that they both are aware that it will be very unlikely for themselves to be re-elected in the next election and they are trying to do as many positive things as possible during this term.
by mick » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:14 am
fish wrote:Cripple you are pretty spot-on in regard to their re-election chances - here are the markets for their respective seats:cripple wrote:The most interesting press conference for me was the one with Windsor and Oakeshott, who are probably more important to this whole proces then the greens. They seem to be happy about the effort being made to reduce emissions and have also been able to see the benefits that will come in the future for their electorates with the continued development of renewable technology. I get the feeling that they both are aware that it will be very unlikely for themselves to be re-elected in the next election and they are trying to do as many positive things as possible during this term.
Lyne
COALITION (LIB/NAT) $1.30
OAKESHOTT, Robert (IND) $3.30
AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY $21.00
New England
COALITION (LIB/NAT) $1.40
WINDSOR, Tony (IND) $2.85
AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY $21.00
If I was them I'd be considering running for the Senate at the next election...
by Media Park » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:00 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Bully » Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:47 pm
mick wrote:redandblack wrote:Bully wrote:redandblack wrote:bully, the idea that Bob Brown would change parties and that the Labor or Liberal parties would accept him and say "Oh, OK, Bob, you can take over as Prime Minister" is just laughable.
laughable you say...i agree. Yes Bob brown is laughing all the way to the bank...if you understand what i mean. Hes a piece of work more so then the rest of them. My point is IF he swicthed or whatever then it would ruin us IF he becomes PM.
But you cant tell me that you cant see that he wants to take over from Julia?? If you cant then the wool is pulled over your eyes
Bully, you would have to have a flock of sheep pulled over your eyes to believe Bob Brown could become Prime Minister in your scenario.
He would have to resign from the Senate, resign from The Greens, join the ALP, persuade a Labor MP to also resign, persuade the Government to risk a by-election and government, then persuade the majority of Labor MP’s to vote out Julia Gillard and replace her with him!
Somehow I don’t think this is going to happen.
I know your argument that he’ll become PM and laugh all the way to the bank is persuasive, but I’ll stick with my opinion, given the above.
Brown is effectively PM now
by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:06 pm
by Sky Pilot » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:14 pm
redandblack wrote:That's the message put out by Tony Abbott. That's fair enough, he's entitled to that political tactic, it's quite valid to do so.
It's nonsense, of course.
Strangely enough, the people who push this the most for him are News Ltd, who have openly stated they are out to destroy The Greens and who run anti-Greens stories nearly every day.
Unfortunately, many people just believe what Mr Murdoch tells them
I don't.
A question. If Mr Abbott had become PM, he would have had to also rely on the support of the Greens and Independents. He offered Mr Wilkie a hospital, no questions asked. So are you saying he wouldn't had to compromise?
by Gozu » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:19 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Where can I read this story RandB?
by once_were_warriors » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:30 pm
by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:37 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:Just leave it to us, the 25% that have no allegiance or bias to the Lab or Libs to make an informed decision on the election of the government.
Whilst you guzzle and bathe in the dogma dished up to you by your parties, we will undertake the diligent review of the policies.
Then again, I don't live in Western Sydney so my vote is pretty much irrelevant anyway
by cripple » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:38 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:Just leave it to us, the 25% that have no allegiance or bias to the Lab or Libs to make an informed decision on the election of the government.
Whilst you guzzle and bathe in the dogma dished up to you by your parties, we will undertake the diligent review of the policies.
Then again, I don't live in Western Sydney so my vote is pretty much irrelevant anyway
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |