by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:33 pm
by southee » Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:39 pm
by dedja » Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:46 pm
by cripple » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:00 pm
by dedja » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:02 pm
by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:42 pm
southee wrote:Yes, frightning but just goes to show how much "hate" and "anger" there is out there against this tax.
Violence is not the answer.
by Sojourner » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:17 pm
by southee » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:37 pm
redandblack wrote:southee wrote:Yes, frightning but just goes to show how much "hate" and "anger" there is out there against this tax.
Violence is not the answer.
No southee, your answer is only worth of a Tea Party follower and you're better than that.
There shouldn't be 'hate' against this tax.
There shouldn't be 'hate' or violence in Australian politics.
As for 'lies', Julia should have just said it was a 'non-core promise'.
PS:
Mate, you complained about fish's ALP ad link, but I like to go into the SANFL Forum without you making anti-Rann statements
by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:41 pm
by southee » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:43 pm
redandblack wrote:I didn't say there was no hate.
I said there shouldn't be hate in Australian politics.
I don't listen to talk-back radio much, too many people who know bugger-all about what they're talking about.
But if you do, I understand
by redandblack » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:47 pm
by fish » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:52 pm
by Sojourner » Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:54 pm
redandblack wrote:There's hope for you, yet, mate
I'll add that talk-back radio is the preserve of the right-wing and has been for as long as I can remember.
Right-wing hosts, employed by right-wing owners, railing at the dreaded communist Labor traitors.
"We need to take up arms to get rid of them"
"We should have another election because the people got it wrong last time".
I prefer my footy involvement
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:35 pm
fish wrote:I seem to remember when Howard brought in the anti-gun laws after the Port Arthur massacre there were threats of violence against him and at least once he wore a bullet proof vest to a public speech...
by smac » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:45 pm
redandblack wrote:southee wrote:Yes, frightning but just goes to show how much "hate" and "anger" there is out there against this tax.
Violence is not the answer.
No southee, your answer is only worth of a Tea Party follower and you're better than that.
There shouldn't be 'hate' against this tax.
There shouldn't be 'hate' or violence in Australian politics.
As for 'lies', Julia should have just said it was a 'non-core promise'.
PS:
Mate, you complained about fish's ALP ad link, but I like to go into the SANFL Forum without you making anti-Rann statements
by Q. » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:11 am
smac wrote:redandblack wrote:
As for 'lies', Julia should have just said it was a 'non-core promise'.
I keep reading that line from various posters over time. If it is/was an issue, why isn't it an issue now, when a Labor Govt does this?
by Squawk » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:31 am
by Q. » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:39 am
by Squawk » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:45 am
Quichey wrote:I don't like the idea of censoring reader comments before they are published. It's important to have a clear code of conduct and to employ an effective post-moderation system that centres on addressing specific complaints.
I think it's important to maintain a certain freedom of online speech by not filtering comments.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |