by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:40 pm
by fish » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:09 pm
They probably don't but according to this report Meat and Livestock Australia did for at least a year beforehand.The Sleeping Giant wrote:How is a cattle producer, living and worker in a remote region of Australia supposed to know what is going on in a slaughterhouse in Indonesia?
by fish » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:10 pm
Spot on Psyber.Psyber wrote:There is a reasonable argument that the responsibility of exporters does not end once the cattle are on the truck.The Sleeping Giant wrote:If reports are correct, then the worker who caused all this has had some justice. How many workers in the slaughter houses in Indonesia haven't been earning a wage in the last 2 months.
The cattle produces job has finished once the cattle is on the truck. Why should they be punished for what happens overseas?
If they know the cattle they sell may be likely to be ill-treated they have some responsibility for the outcome of selling them anyway.
You could similarly argue that the Vichy French were not responsible for what the Gestapo did to any Jews they handed over.
by fish » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:12 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:15 pm
fish wrote:They probably don't but according to this report Meat and Livestock Australia did for at least a year beforehand.The Sleeping Giant wrote:How is a cattle producer, living and worker in a remote region of Australia supposed to know what is going on in a slaughterhouse in Indonesia?
If I was a worker in the cattle indutry I would be pissed off with Meat and Livestock Australia for not ensuring that inhumane practices were halted once they came to light.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:20 pm
fish wrote:Spot on Psyber.Psyber wrote:There is a reasonable argument that the responsibility of exporters does not end once the cattle are on the truck.The Sleeping Giant wrote:If reports are correct, then the worker who caused all this has had some justice. How many workers in the slaughter houses in Indonesia haven't been earning a wage in the last 2 months.
The cattle produces job has finished once the cattle is on the truck. Why should they be punished for what happens overseas?
If they know the cattle they sell may be likely to be ill-treated they have some responsibility for the outcome of selling them anyway.
You could similarly argue that the Vichy French were not responsible for what the Gestapo did to any Jews they handed over.
by Ian » Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:33 pm
Totally agree TSG, they can only be responsible for their own actions, They are their to provide livestock for the rest of us to eat, make a dollar so they can eat, each link in the chain needs to be responsible for it's own actions.The Sleeping Giant wrote:fish wrote:Spot on Psyber.Psyber wrote:There is a reasonable argument that the responsibility of exporters does not end once the cattle are on the truck.The Sleeping Giant wrote:If reports are correct, then the worker who caused all this has had some justice. How many workers in the slaughter houses in Indonesia haven't been earning a wage in the last 2 months.
The cattle produces job has finished once the cattle is on the truck. Why should they be punished for what happens overseas?
If they know the cattle they sell may be likely to be ill-treated they have some responsibility for the outcome of selling them anyway.
You could similarly argue that the Vichy French were not responsible for what the Gestapo did to any Jews they handed over.
Far from spot on. These cattle farmers are only concerned with producing cattle. It's not their job to make sure the produce is treated humanely after it has left the station. Just as it's not the truck drivers job to make sure they are treated humanely after they are delivered to the cattle yards.
by Sojourner » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:12 pm
fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
by Gozu » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:39 am
Sojourner wrote:fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.
by RustyCage » Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:30 pm
fish wrote:They probably don't but according to [url=http://www.news.com.au/national/mla-knew-about-cruel-live-export-cattle-kills-in-indonesia-report-shows/story-e6frfkw0-1226072897165]this report[/url] Meat and Livestock Australia did for at least a year beforehand.The Sleeping Giant wrote:How is a cattle producer, living and worker in a remote region of Australia supposed to know what is going on in a slaughterhouse in Indonesia?
If I was a worker in the cattle indutry I would be pissed off with Meat and Livestock Australia for not ensuring that inhumane practices were halted once they came to light.
by RustyCage » Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:31 pm
fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
by smac » Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:57 pm
Gozu wrote:Sojourner wrote:fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.
It would've been perfectly acceptable had said Independents sided with the Libs/Nats to put them into government though.
by fish » Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:28 pm
What a mob of sore losers!Sojourner wrote:Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
by fish » Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:33 pm
That may be so but clearly it hasn't worked when you consider the extreme cruelty in the recent footage from Indonesia.pafc1870 wrote:In the last couple of years Australia has spent millions of dollars improving conditions of slaughterhouses in Indonesia, installing the latest equipment and training their workers.
by RustyCage » Tue Aug 16, 2011 9:47 pm
fish wrote:That may be so but clearly it hasn't worked when you consider the extreme cruelty in the recent footage from Indonesia.pafc1870 wrote:In the last couple of years Australia has spent millions of dollars improving conditions of slaughterhouses in Indonesia, installing the latest equipment and training their workers.
by Sojourner » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:32 pm
Gozu wrote:Sojourner wrote:fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.
It would've been perfectly acceptable had said Independents sided with the Libs/Nats to put them into government though.
by Gozu » Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:23 am
Sojourner wrote:True, yet if the situation was reversed I have no doubt that the same concerns would be also being raised also by protests from the left wing side of politics!
by JohnnyG » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:41 am
Sojourner wrote:fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.
by Bat Pad » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:49 am
JohnnyG wrote:Sojourner wrote:fish wrote:Is anyone able to shed any light on why this group "don't accept this is a democratically elected government"?
Leon Byner interviewed a chap from there today and asked him the same question, the reply given was that they don't agree with the preferential system of voting and the process of independents siding with political parties to decide who governs the country, the organiser suggested that the people of Australia should do that and not a few independent members being given the opportunity to say who governs and who does not.
They have NFI how our electoral system works - i wonder what alternative system they believe in?
FWIW:
- (Labor + Greens) received 49.75% of the 1st preference votes v (Libs + LNP Qld + Nats + Country Libs) 43.62%
- Labor 50.12% v Libs/Nats 49.88% of the 2-party preferred
These people are simple-minded sore losersand if they really think it through - they themselves are opposing democracy.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |