by Dutchy » Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:56 pm
by Jimmy » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:00 pm
by BigRed42 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:01 pm
by Brad » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:10 pm
Jimmy wrote:BITCHES![]()
has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?
encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!
cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.
no sheedy as well!!
hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:13 pm
by stampy » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:16 pm
Jimmy wrote:BITCHES![]()
has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?
encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!
cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.
no sheedy as well!!
hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:26 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:28 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:29 pm
Jim05 wrote:Common theme appearing these last few weeks with sides poor kicking for goal costing them matches. One area that just hasnt got better through the years, by the sounds of it North missed some sitters.
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:35 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Jim05 wrote:Common theme appearing these last few weeks with sides poor kicking for goal costing them matches. One area that just hasnt got better through the years, by the sounds of it North missed some sitters.
Sounded like both sides missed some sitters Jim.
by Dirko » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:42 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?
by westcoastpanther » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:43 pm
by Pseudo » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:44 pm
Jimmy wrote:has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:49 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes, first time ever a wooden spooner has beaten 1 side 3 times in a season, and the #1 reason North don't deserve to play finals.
by Thiele » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:50 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:58 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.
But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.
3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.
Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.
Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:14 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.
But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.
3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.
Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.
Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?
Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:17 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.
But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.
3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.
Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.
Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?
Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:22 pm
I'm sure they will, on the say so of one Sturt fan.Jim05 wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.
But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.
3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.
Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.
Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?
Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.
Wonder if the North people who were getting stuck into Bown last week for king hitting Backwell will come out and say that Backwell is a coward aswell.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |