by Big Phil » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:51 am
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:00 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:09 pm
by Zorro » Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:15 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:It would have been so much better for North if Norwood had won on Saturday. Still think North can give this one a shake.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:19 pm
by Grahaml » Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:37 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:If the Dogs finished 2nd, therefore not having a weeks break, they would have surely rested anyone with a niggle. Now if they rest a player he won't play for 3 weeks. It ain't rocket surgery.
As I said, North are still a chance.
by The Apostle » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:23 pm
by Dog_ger » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:44 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:52 pm
by Trent Plucktrum » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:19 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:35 pm
Trent Plucktrum wrote:North by 10 goals !!
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:40 pm
Big Phil wrote:Trent Plucktrum wrote:North by 10 goals !!
Arrogance much?
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:45 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:If the Dogs finished 2nd, therefore not having a weeks break, they would have surely rested anyone with a niggle. Now if they rest a player he won't play for 3 weeks. It ain't rocket surgery.
Grahaml wrote:
2 weeks off for a few guys after a long season isn't the worst thing in the world.
Roy Laird wrote:"We've got the first week of finals off so we don't want too many of them having two weeks off," he said.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:52 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:30 pm
by Big Phil » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:35 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:Some potentially hard decsions for Centrals if some of those players don't come up this week considering the week off to follow.
by Grahaml » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:49 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:If the Dogs finished 2nd, therefore not having a weeks break, they would have surely rested anyone with a niggle. Now if they rest a player he won't play for 3 weeks. It ain't rocket surgery.Grahaml wrote:
2 weeks off for a few guys after a long season isn't the worst thing in the world.Roy Laird wrote:"We've got the first week of finals off so we don't want too many of them having two weeks off," he said.
What's that Grahaml? Oh, you are wrong.
by CENTURION » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:53 pm
by Grahaml » Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:00 pm
CENTURION wrote:Interesting match this one, Do We ease up a bit, make sure We don't get any more injuries & risk losing & have North in the finals? OR do We go all out to make sure Port make it, therefore increasing Our chances of PAYBACK??
I think Roy isn't that sort of bloke, it will be interesting to see who comes back in this weekend for Us, therefore I will reserve my selection for Friday......unless I get banned again.
by whufc » Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:04 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |