Is South's draw a bit rude?

[Booney]

Rude? Tell you what rude is,Magpies go to Carlunga in rounds 14 and 18. Go figure.

[Rik E Boy]

Rude? Tell you what rude is,Magpies go to Carlunga in rounds 14 and 18. Go figure.

As if Port fans ever make the trip. How many times have you been to Carlunga Mr Boon? I've been there many times and even went to that game held at Bice Oval..it's still better than going to Elizabeth *shudder*

Maybe the SANFL are trying to tell you blokes something ha ha.

regards,

REB

[Booney]

Rude? Tell you what rude is,Magpies go to Carlunga in rounds 14 and 18. Go figure.

As if Port fans ever make the trip. How many times have you been to Carlunga Mr Boon? I've been there many times and even went to that game held at Bice Oval..it's still better than going to Elizabeth *shudder*

Maybe the SANFL are trying to tell you blokes something ha ha.

regards,

REB

Been down there twice.For a win and a loss.

Yes,much better then Elizabeth.

[Rik E Boy]

It was fun trying to fire up a Billy in that wind!

regards,

REB

[mighty_tiger_79]

maybe they think they arent upto the Eags, dogs and maybe rooster but feel confident in beating the other teams every time they play them.

Yep, I'm sure that's how we've planned the season. We won't try against those three but win everything else.

Saturday's result was far from ideal but to suggest it's the beginning of the end for 2007 is a little silly. We now know we have a lot of work to do, not such a bad thing....

I didnt say that you wouldnt be trying against those teams

[StrayDog]

Is it just me or do you lot reckon the Panthers drew the short straw in regards to the draw to open the season? They get the two best sides in the league at the ends of the Earth to begin their season.

Yep, and on top of that, two of their last three games are at Elizabeth and Woodville.


By my reckoning (open to correction, of course), compared with 2006 fellow "middle three" teams (Port and Glenelg):-



versus last year's top 3

South - 8 Matches: 5 Away, 3 Home (if you include Encounter Bay)
Glenelg - 7 Matches: 4 Away, 3 Home
Port - 6 Matches: 3 Away, 3 Home


versus last year's bottom 3

South - 7 Matches: 3 Away, 4 Home
Glenelg - 8 Matches: 4 Away (if you include Sturt at Adelaide), 4 Home
Port - 8 Matches: 3 Away, 5 Home



I'd rather have Port's draw than South's, on both counts.

[Hondo]

If they are going to lose to Central and the Eagles anyway it prob doesn't matter if it's rounds 1-2 or 8-9. If they are good enough, the Panthers will quickly get back on track.

[Rik E Boy]

Is it just me or do you lot reckon the Panthers drew the short straw in regards to the draw to open the season? They get the two best sides in the league at the ends of the Earth to begin their season.

Yep, and on top of that, two of their last three games are at Elizabeth and Woodville.


By my reckoning (open to correction, of course), compared with 2006 fellow "middle three" teams (Port and Glenelg):-



versus last year's top 3

South - 8 Matches: 5 Away, 3 Home (if you include Encounter Bay)
Glenelg - 7 Matches: 4 Away, 3 Home
Port - 6 Matches: 3 Away, 3 Home


versus last year's bottom 3

South - 7 Matches: 3 Away, 4 Home
Glenelg - 8 Matches: 4 Away (if you include Sturt at Adelaide), 4 Home
Port - 8 Matches: 3 Away, 5 Home



I'd rather have Port's draw than South's, on both counts.

If I was the slightest bit cynical I'd suggest that the SNAFFLE is pretty keen on having the Barnacles back in the top three.

regards,

REB