by Bum Crack » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:23 pm
by BIG SEXY » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:40 pm
Bum Crack wrote:I've lost 7 kilo in three weeks swimming, walking and eating healthy. 20 more kilo to go.
by Bully » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:35 pm
by Q. » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:24 pm
Bully wrote:I have recently started the meal repalcement of Rapid Loss. I was 95kilos and now 84 kilos. This was done in 3 weeks. I have the meal shake in morning, and i am not hungry until dinner time.
This does work. And it has a nice taste, taste like milo(probably is just milo) but this does work. About $40 for a tub from the supermarkets but is worth it IMO
The diet that only works and has always only worked is eating less IMO.
by Brucetiki » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:26 pm
kickinit wrote:Good work what's the weight you want to get to
by Bully » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:33 pm
Q. wrote:Bully wrote:I have recently started the meal repalcement of Rapid Loss. I was 95kilos and now 84 kilos. This was done in 3 weeks. I have the meal shake in morning, and i am not hungry until dinner time.
This does work. And it has a nice taste, taste like milo(probably is just milo) but this does work. About $40 for a tub from the supermarkets but is worth it IMO
The diet that only works and has always only worked is eating less IMO.
So you don't eat between breakfast and dinner? A good way to ensure that you slow your metabolism down. You are then a high chance of gaining all the weight back once you resume eating normally (unless you compensate by exercising everyday).
by Q. » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:57 pm
Bully wrote:Q. wrote:Bully wrote:I have recently started the meal repalcement of Rapid Loss. I was 95kilos and now 84 kilos. This was done in 3 weeks. I have the meal shake in morning, and i am not hungry until dinner time.
This does work. And it has a nice taste, taste like milo(probably is just milo) but this does work. About $40 for a tub from the supermarkets but is worth it IMO
The diet that only works and has always only worked is eating less IMO.
So you don't eat between breakfast and dinner? A good way to ensure that you slow your metabolism down. You are then a high chance of gaining all the weight back once you resume eating normally (unless you compensate by exercising everyday).
your my doctor are you? Wowno i dont eat between breakfast and dinner .....no
And yes i do exercise also. but i wont be putting that weight back on. It was my choice to get to the weight i got to, and its just as easy to remove in the way i said. And what i eat is healthy food. So again, wont be putting the weight back on. everyone is different, and you saying i will just put the weight back on is incorrect. like i said, it was my choice to gain weight, but it can be removed.
by Bully » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:04 pm
by kickinit » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:04 pm
by Bum Crack » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:20 pm
kickinit wrote:“Meal Replacement Shakes have been on the market for a while but I’ve always pushed my clients away from them because a low calorie diet is nothing if it doesn’t keep the weight off long-term. I sat down with Pharmabrand and told them exactly what the community needed: A low calorie shake that fills the stomach, and an education program that teaches you how to introduce the foods you love. However, I’ve taken it once step further and designed the program so that you can eat 3 meals a day, and have 2 shakes between and you’ll still lose between 1-3kg per week!”
According to the website you should be having 3 meals a day. The whole reason behind this is so your metabolism is constantly working when you don't eat for a long period of time it will slow down, and as you get older and older it slows down naturally by itself. Your "meal replacement" shake is only a protein shake and usually have added fibre to give you that full effect some you will find will have a better amino acid profile added vitamins, aminos I really wouldn't worry about if your only after weight loss and the vitamins are easily covered by a multi. The thing you have to remember is that a shake is only there to replace a meal for convience, those companies that push you should have one or two everyday is a load of you know what. Like i've said on here before on the weekends I don't even have a shake because I can eat my meals without any problems, mon-fri I do have 2 shakes a day only because I can't while i'm working. If you can you should always eat proper meals over having a shake.
by Psyber » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:35 pm
by Q. » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:30 pm
Bum Crack wrote:kickinit wrote:“Meal Replacement Shakes have been on the market for a while but I’ve always pushed my clients away from them because a low calorie diet is nothing if it doesn’t keep the weight off long-term. I sat down with Pharmabrand and told them exactly what the community needed: A low calorie shake that fills the stomach, and an education program that teaches you how to introduce the foods you love. However, I’ve taken it once step further and designed the program so that you can eat 3 meals a day, and have 2 shakes between and you’ll still lose between 1-3kg per week!”
According to the website you should be having 3 meals a day. The whole reason behind this is so your metabolism is constantly working when you don't eat for a long period of time it will slow down, and as you get older and older it slows down naturally by itself. Your "meal replacement" shake is only a protein shake and usually have added fibre to give you that full effect some you will find will have a better amino acid profile added vitamins, aminos I really wouldn't worry about if your only after weight loss and the vitamins are easily covered by a multi. The thing you have to remember is that a shake is only there to replace a meal for convience, those companies that push you should have one or two everyday is a load of you know what. Like i've said on here before on the weekends I don't even have a shake because I can eat my meals without any problems, mon-fri I do have 2 shakes a day only because I can't while i'm working. If you can you should always eat proper meals over having a shake.
what meals do you suggest?
by kickinit » Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:19 am
by Bully » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:12 pm
by kickinit » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:13 pm
by Bully » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:57 pm
by kickinit » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:57 pm
by Bully » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:02 pm
kickinit wrote:Yes I hear what your saying not everyone is the same but every diet has principal calories in vs calories out. Even when I'm bulking I wouldn't eat those sort of meals. Seeing you where a bodybuilder you understand the benefits of eating more often then having 1 meal and a shake. Yes you have lost weight and as a bodybuilder you would know that you would of lost more muscle then fat.
by Q. » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:19 pm
Bully wrote:kickinit wrote:Yes I hear what your saying not everyone is the same but every diet has principal calories in vs calories out. Even when I'm bulking I wouldn't eat those sort of meals. Seeing you where a bodybuilder you understand the benefits of eating more often then having 1 meal and a shake. Yes you have lost weight and as a bodybuilder you would know that you would of lost more muscle then fat.
they say that being as lean as a body builder that we all see without any fat on their bodies is their boody is at its weakest point....at point of failure
by kickinit » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:06 am
Q. wrote:Bully wrote:kickinit wrote:Yes I hear what your saying not everyone is the same but every diet has principal calories in vs calories out. Even when I'm bulking I wouldn't eat those sort of meals. Seeing you where a bodybuilder you understand the benefits of eating more often then having 1 meal and a shake. Yes you have lost weight and as a bodybuilder you would know that you would of lost more muscle then fat.
they say that being as lean as a body builder that we all see without any fat on their bodies is their boody is at its weakest point....at point of failure
Cutting to 5-6% BF for comps or photo-shoots isn't ideal for strength, which is why most don't attempt to maintain it all year round.
However 10-15% BF is still lean (abs visible) and doesn't compromise strength.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |