Tribunal Results 17/4/07

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Tribunal Results 17/4/07

Postby Wedgie » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:22 am

Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby RustyCage » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:28 am

The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Postby Wedgie » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:30 am

pafc1870 wrote:The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!

Yeah, from all reports it was much worse than the Sporn or Westhoff incidents, great to see the consitency already creeping out of the tribunal by Rd 2. :roll:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby RustyCage » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:35 am

Wedgie wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!

Yeah, from all reports it was much worse than the Sporn or Westhoff incidents, great to see the consitency already creeping out of the tribunal by Rd 2. :roll:


the tribunal usually are consistant, you are either not guilty and get off, or are guilty and get a reprimand!
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Postby Wedgie » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:36 am

pafc1870 wrote:the tribunal usually are consistant, you are either not guilty and get off, or are guilty and get a reprimand!

Tell that to Sporn and Westhoff! The tribunal seemed to be setting a stance for the new year which has gone out the window already.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby JK » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:40 am

Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby MST » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:53 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)


Or, CP, if your club (Sturt) is coming up against the side the player who got off plays for (Port). With the likely outs from our ruck division this week, we certainly could have done with Jezza enjoying a little holiday.

Boo the tribunal.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby smac » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:57 am

His good record in the sanfl was only 1 season more than Westhoffs - and Westhoff didn't spend last year abusing umpires. :shock:
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Postby Jimmy » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:59 am

MST wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)


Or, CP, if your club (Sturt) is coming up against the side the player who got off plays for (Port). With the likely outs from our ruck division this week, we certainly could have done with Jezza enjoying a little holiday.

Boo the tribunal.


my thoughts exactly, i actually started to think about this game with him missing...

thanks for nothing jerks. :roll: :roll:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby JK » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:18 am

smac wrote:His good record in the sanfl was only 1 season more than Westhoffs - and Westhoff didn't spend last year abusing umpires. :shock:


Yeah fair call mate, I commented to a friend this morning that I'd bet Westhoff wouldn't be too impressed
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby Booney » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:19 am

He was merely offering constructive criticism during last years matches,it appears to have been accepted well and taken on board. :lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61692
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8210 times
Been liked: 11941 times

Re: Tribunal Results 17/4/07

Postby spell_check » Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:04 pm

Wedgie wrote:Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.


Apparently because he was found guilty this makes him ineligible for the Magarey.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: Tribunal Results 17/4/07

Postby Blacky » Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:55 pm

spell_check wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.


Apparently because he was found guilty this makes him ineligible for the Magarey.

correct
Current image:
Maximum dimensions; width: 100 pixels, height: 100 pixels, file size: 20.51 KiB
The avatar functionality is currently DISABLED.
Blacky
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Front bar at WESTIES
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 50 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Postby Scottdog » Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:10 pm

Wiggins gets off for Headbutting?Clayton gets a reprimand because of his good record???Well Im pretty sure J.Westhoff has a good clean record and he gets 2 weeks,what a JOKE.
Scottdog
Mini-League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:56 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:12 pm

Scottdog wrote:Wiggins gets off for Headbutting?Clayton gets a reprimand because of his good record???Well Im pretty sure J.Westhoff has a good clean record and he gets 2 weeks,what a JOKE.

Not to mention Sporn getting a week for someone running into him. :?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Scottdog » Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:56 pm

Has Sporn ever been reported before,AFL or SANFL.Westys was clumsy on Wintle but with his thin physique its lucky that he didnt break his leg by making contact with Wintles head.I still cant believe it he basically misses a month of footy and a possible AFL call up and the ANZAC day match.Gee I hope that the twins behave themselves this season.
Scottdog
Mini-League
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:56 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby giffo » Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:52 pm

Its all part of a conspiracy to get Centrals out of the GF. Apparently stocks of blue paint are getting down and West End want some different colours this year. :wink:
giffo
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:18 am
Location: Land of bewilderment
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 34 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Postby once_were_warriors » Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:31 pm

Well i saw the incident ( claytons ) and didn't think much at the time , other than it being a cheap shot
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
once_were_warriors
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |