Gervais wrote:Kick'n Back wrote:Gervais wrote:the hfl proposal will see the following teams in div 2:
• 2 x teams from current central division
• birdwood
• echunga
• meadows
• kanagarilla
• kersbrook (who will need to find a U13 team)
• nairne
all other clubs (gums, maccy, seadan, cally) will be in div 3. to be eligible to go to div 2, they'll need to be able to commit to five teams on match-day.
Kersbrook do have a U13 team. You can not just make div 2 clubs that can produce all 3 juniour sides otherwise clubs like Uraidla (dominate div 1) Kersbrook (who have missed finals footy twice over the past 25 years) and Torrens Valley(another div 1 club who dominated div 2 when in it) who struggle to put 3 junior sides on the park could find themselves playing in the 3rd div
sorry, the reference to no under 13 team should be next to kangarilla, not kersbrook.
i disagree with you second point. it should be a 100% enforceable pre-requisite that div 2 teams have all three junior sides. the clubs you mention (uraidla, tv and kersbrook) can all find plenty of money to pay players, and need to spend some of this cash on promoting their club and attacting and retaining junior.
the restructuring of the competition into 3 diivisions is about much more than just eliminating the cally 50 goal blowouts. its about ensuring that all div1 and div2 teams have 5 games on the one day, and not the scenario that is happening in country div in 2012.
Just wondering what the age limits are for the three junior sides - is it u/13, 15 and 17.5? - those age groups are farily close together, especially for the smaller populations of Hills Country towns. Wondering whether going back to U/14 and U/17 or 17.5, and then have an U/10 or 11 Auskick or minileague, like many other country comps do, fits better, or does the association already run an Auskick?