did sri lanka 'pull up' so not to play australia ?

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

did sri lanka 'pull up' so they didn't have to meet australia in the semi's ?

yes they pulled up
7
41%
no they did not 'pull up'
2
12%
i'm not sure/don't know
0
No votes
more than likely
8
47%
not likely
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 17

did sri lanka 'pull up' so not to play australia ?

Postby bayman » Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:20 pm

did sri lanka pull up so they did not meet australia until the final ? & not in the semi final
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby am Bays » Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:45 pm

Where's the option: no chance of playing Australia in the semis unless we won and the Kiwi's won (v Aust) so needed our best team agaisnt them

In short Bayman SL more likely to play Aust if they lost against us it put them in jeopardy of finishing 4th (remote)

Their chance of playing Australia are dependant on the NZ v Aus game the winner of that will go top in other words the Aus v SL relatively superflouus to the final finishing order
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19773
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Postby bayman » Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:54 pm

perhaps i miss read the article the other day, but how i read it (interpreted it) is the way i put it up, anyway why would you 'rest players' at this time of the tournament ? :? :? :?
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby Newman » Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:46 am

How pathetic of Sri Lanka to not play Vaas and Murali against the aussies. What's even more pathetic they play them against Ireland bowl them out for 77 and talk them selves up again. I hope they get absolutely smashed in the semi.
Newman
Under 18s
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:19 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Aerie » Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:59 am

Such is the nature of the tournament, Sri Lanka could send out who they liked for the game against the Aussies. It was a dead rubber. Only a few more of these warm up games before the tournament actually gets serious in the Semis. Any news on whether Malinga will be fit enough to resume playing before the tournament is over?
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:20 am

there was nothing wrong with what sri lanka did, as holding explained before the withdrawal of the sri lankan players australia were $1.50, as soon as people found out the teams the aussies shortened dramatically on betfair

nothing wrong with resting players, they made a smart move, as it is in their best interests to avoid australia till the final and im sure australia are grateful to the extent they only have to play sth africa which would be an easy game for them.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60992
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13456 times
Been liked: 4652 times

Postby Newman » Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:28 am

Time will tell if it was a bad move or not. I just think that if they were going to rest players why did they not against the easier game Ireland. Perhaps they didnt want to expose Vaas and Murali to the Aussies. In any case Murali takes 4/19 against Ireland and people start talking him up again. He has taken 450 ODI wickets and I would like to know how many of those wickets have come against the lesser known countries. Until he can do it consistently against the best in the world there will always be a question mark over him for mine.
Newman
Under 18s
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:19 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby RustyCage » Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:05 pm

Newman wrote:How pathetic of Sri Lanka to not play Vaas and Murali against the aussies. What's even more pathetic they play them against Ireland bowl them out for 77 and talk them selves up again. I hope they get absolutely smashed in the semi.


Vaas and Murali are two people who could miss 12 months of cricket and come back and dominate straight away, so it wont effect the two players, some other players got match practice, and they didn't lose confidence by having their full strength team beaten by a team they will play again at some stage very soon. No harm done I dont think.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Postby Newman » Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:00 pm

They always seem to dominate the minnows
Newman
Under 18s
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:19 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Hondo » Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:44 pm

Maybe they were trying to stop Australia getting the psychological edge that may have been gained if the Aussies easily beat their best team. Sort of gave the game away waiting for a more important tilt at either the Semi's or the final.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby bayman » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:31 am

the proof is in the pudding !!! read one of the sydney papers they bluntly said what i said, now sl have won overnight they only meet australia again if we make (& will) the final, in short sl pulled up & it worked & good luck to them
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby am Bays » Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:37 pm

bayman wrote:the proof is in the pudding !!! read one of the sydney papers they bluntly said what i said, now sl have won overnight they only meet australia again if we make (& will) the final, in short sl pulled up & it worked & good luck to them


As I said didn't matter what they did win they would have avoided us is all likelihood they would have finished on top and we would've come 2nd, lose and they would have avoided us as they did....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19773
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:50 pm

Sri Lanka pulled up against the AUSSIES, and they rested key players who performed very well this morning against the kiwis.

The result from the game against the aussies probably wouldnt have mattered because they could have finished top and avoided the semi clash and they by losing although there was some risk in meeting the aussies again, it was unlikely to happen. they rested key players, they got the $1.50 on australia on betfair before the teams were announced.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60992
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13456 times
Been liked: 4652 times


Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |