by Vulcan » Mon May 14, 2012 8:37 pm
by Mister Footy » Mon May 14, 2012 8:45 pm
GO THE PUNT wrote:I will say it again the strong clubs have to unite together and force the hand of the sfl board. But they all have to do it. Heres an idea how about having a vote of no confidence agaist the board and ousting them but if you want change you better have some good people to feel the shoes.
by Waterboy » Mon May 14, 2012 11:28 pm
Mister Footy wrote:GO THE PUNT wrote:I will say it again the strong clubs have to unite together and force the hand of the sfl board. But they all have to do it. Heres an idea how about having a vote of no confidence agaist the board and ousting them but if you want change you better have some good people to feel the shoes.
I overheard a conversation between a SFL board member and a valley supporter on the weekend and they have divided the competition into thirds from the ladder last year and asked each third to put a person forward to represent those clubs on a working party to look at the Div 1 or Div 2 matter - they have a representative of the bottom and middle thirds but waiting for the top 4 clubs to put someone forward. Now pretty sure I heard this right (I wasnt that close to them) but I wasnt aware of this working party - anyone else know anything about it?
On another matter Porties were good on the weekend and take nothing away from them but we played like a bunch of 80 year olds.... Hopefully all those that were getting ahead of themselves at the club (and I am not referring to the players here) will pull their heads in
by 1983 » Tue May 15, 2012 12:12 pm
by Caramels » Tue May 15, 2012 2:22 pm
by afc9798 » Tue May 15, 2012 2:37 pm
Caramels wrote:Some rumblings coming from 2 or 3 leagues that they may pull the pin on the CFL in the near future. Pretty serious debate being had by the SFL, GSFL & KIFL I have been told.
True or false?
by Mister Footy » Tue May 15, 2012 4:20 pm
1983 wrote:From the minutes of the Senior Delegates meeting on April 16th
5. The sub-committee formed for the future of the League taking into consideration variable, as called at the President’s meeting that (two) nominations are still required from the top ten teams for this sub-committee to move forward.
by Bag The Points » Tue May 15, 2012 11:47 pm
by Moe » Wed May 16, 2012 8:43 am
Bag The Points wrote:Had a good look today at the record of Morphie Park so far this year and its pretty impressive.
Their two losses have been against Port (currently top) and Brighton (reigning premiers), and in the meantime have taken down Flaggies and thrashed Reynella.
This reads like a pretty dangerous unit that no side can take lightly come September. (especially if they can keep these sort of results coming).
by afc9798 » Wed May 16, 2012 9:48 am
Moe wrote:Bag The Points wrote:Had a good look today at the record of Morphie Park so far this year and its pretty impressive.
Their two losses have been against Port (currently top) and Brighton (reigning premiers), and in the meantime have taken down Flaggies and thrashed Reynella.
This reads like a pretty dangerous unit that no side can take lightly come September. (especially if they can keep these sort of results coming).
Great. Cue the "Well, they are paying their players so much, yada,yada,yada" lines.
by Zelezny Chucks » Wed May 16, 2012 11:55 am
afc9798 wrote:Moe wrote:Bag The Points wrote:Had a good look today at the record of Morphie Park so far this year and its pretty impressive.
Their two losses have been against Port (currently top) and Brighton (reigning premiers), and in the meantime have taken down Flaggies and thrashed Reynella.
This reads like a pretty dangerous unit that no side can take lightly come September. (especially if they can keep these sort of results coming).
Great. Cue the "Well, they are paying their players so much, yada,yada,yada" lines.
Or maybe you could just accept it as a compliment and be flattered that a player like Cranston chose your club over multiple offers. MVPFC deserve some credit for putting a good team on the park and beiong able to cover the loss of Guillhaus. Your juniors also seem to be an improved outfit, so enjoy the success.
by RFC 2010 » Wed May 16, 2012 2:08 pm
by King » Wed May 16, 2012 5:42 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:afc9798 wrote:Moe wrote:Bag The Points wrote:Had a good look today at the record of Morphie Park so far this year and its pretty impressive.
Their two losses have been against Port (currently top) and Brighton (reigning premiers), and in the meantime have taken down Flaggies and thrashed Reynella.
This reads like a pretty dangerous unit that no side can take lightly come September. (especially if they can keep these sort of results coming).
Great. Cue the "Well, they are paying their players so much, yada,yada,yada" lines.
Or maybe you could just accept it as a compliment and be flattered that a player like Cranston chose your club over multiple offers. MVPFC deserve some credit for putting a good team on the park and beiong able to cover the loss of Guillhaus. Your juniors also seem to be an improved outfit, so enjoy the success.
Moe seems to like getting on the front foot with the truth it seems.
by Caramels » Wed May 16, 2012 6:26 pm
Caramels wrote:Some rumblings coming from 2 or 3 leagues that they may pull the pin on the CFL in the near future. Pretty serious debate being had by the SFL, GSFL & KIFL I have been told.
True or false?
by King » Wed May 16, 2012 8:40 pm
vics01 wrote:Yep 18 points
by Esteban Vihaio » Wed May 16, 2012 9:57 pm
King wrote:vics01 wrote:Yep 18 points
Put's a different perspective on it. Moe can whinge all he likes about player payments, juniors and all the rest but at the moment certain clubs have an advantage. Simple fact!
by Head over it » Thu May 17, 2012 1:34 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:King wrote:vics01 wrote:Yep 18 points
Put's a different perspective on it. Moe can whinge all he likes about player payments, juniors and all the rest but at the moment certain clubs have an advantage. Simple fact!
Bitching about clubs on forums is old to say the least. Each club has their advantages, whether it youthfull population, Culture, or ability to attract sponsors.
teaspoon full of cement
by mots02 » Thu May 17, 2012 2:06 pm
by afc9798 » Thu May 17, 2012 4:21 pm
mots02 wrote:I have just noted that the CFL have appointed another person to pay wages to. Kym Ireland(ex WWT Dev. Officer) has been appointed as Regional Programs Manager so there's another $70K - $80K+ per year that someone has to pay for.
Guess who? The clubs!!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |