by bayman » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:38 pm
by Bluedemon » Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:14 pm
by The Girth » Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:17 pm
by Bluedemon » Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:02 pm
The Girth wrote:fair dinkum kookas that is ridiculus whats wrong with posting kids results and best players i know when i was young i got a buzz out of seeing my name in the best or for kicking goals this is creating a problem down the track when the lads play u14's and players are named in the best or for goals and little johnny misses out he and or his parents sometimes spit the dummy cause its just not fair. I know its not your rule but in my opinion it is stupid
by bayman » Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:16 pm
kookas wrote:Bayman, under the rules of junior football no results are to be posted or recorded for the U/8's, U/9's and U/10's competition, please remove this posting. If it happens again there might be a fine sent to your club (I know the rules as i am involved in the MSJFL)
by The Rooster » Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:18 am
by Bluedemon » Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:26 am
The Rooster wrote:Well Said, What a stupid, absurd thing the AFL has a monopoly on Aussie Rules football and thinks it's rules should apply to everyone in every league!
They have pretty much killed off junior football and Mini-League with their AUSKICK!
i can remember being a lad and being picked to play for centrals, it was awesome. pull your head in Kooka's it's only kids!!
by Pearcey » Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:31 pm
by heater31 » Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:29 pm
Pearcey wrote:How's this,
In North Eastern Metro the published winning margin can be no more than 60 points for U/11's to U/16's. So if you win by 25 goals to 3 the published score, and the score used to calculate the ladder, will be 13 goals to 3. It will be a disadvantage to win by 25 goals to 3, rather than 11 goals to 1, because once the score is adjusted the team winning by the bigger margin will have a lower percentage.
What do you think?
Apparently this is designed to make coaches with big leads in games rotate their players and give the less brilliant players a go. But my argument is - why should a good player be dragged just because the team is performing well, or the opposition is poor? Kids play football because they want to, and they want to play as well as possible. Do teams now have to ease off, miss shots for goal, miss tackles, kick to the opposition ext, just because they are better than the opposition. In a recent game our U/16's coach played all his players out of position after 1/2 time and it reduced the winning margin from, maybe, 40 goals to 26 goals. Maybe he should have taken a player off every 5 minutes and made it 10 vesus 18 at the end of the game.
Maybe the onus should be on the 'weaker' teams to get better coaches, promote the game in their area, build depth and fitness, rather than penalising the 'stronger' teams.
by Pearcey » Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:06 am
by Punk Rooster » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:25 am
kookas wrote:Bayman, under the rules of junior football no results are to be posted or recorded for the U/8's, U/9's and U/10's competition, please remove this posting. If it happens again there might be a fine sent to your club (I know the rules as i am involved in the MSJFL)
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:18 pm
by malleebull » Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:54 pm
by heater31 » Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:34 pm
malleebull wrote:i watched pooraka u/8 . in my opinion there was too many flooding tactics use by the coaches. they even used themselves to fill in the empty spaces.![]()
![]()
![]()
by Benchwarmer » Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:40 pm
by malleebull » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:08 pm
by Benchwarmer » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:17 pm
by malleebull » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:31 pm
by bayman » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:56 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |