Mr Beefy wrote:Hey Satchel, I hear you blokes played a couple who haven't been cleared from us, and against Seaton too, not very smart
Any news??
by Alan » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:39 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Hey Satchel, I hear you blokes played a couple who haven't been cleared from us, and against Seaton too, not very smart
by LMA » Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:20 pm
Alan wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Hey Satchel, I hear you blokes played a couple who haven't been cleared from us, and against Seaton too, not very smart
Any news??
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:28 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Hey Satchel, I hear you blokes played a couple who haven't been cleared from us, and against Seaton too, not very smart
SATCHEL wrote:Seaton tried this on half way through the third quarter address. No issues whatsoever . Thanks for your concern though beef.
by Footy Follower » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:16 pm
Newman wrote:red strip roo wrote:This post is not from me
don't shoot the messenger
Requested by a close friend & member of Adel Luth's...
This is what I want ya to put in: these seaton stories seem a bit deluded. I heard from a salisbury Person that a Lutheran player was king hit and had his face smashed first. Another seaton player hit another player, both red carded and didn't leave the field. Then they and others got involved and messed with a couple others they wish they hadn't and got some of their own medicine back... What goes around comes around. The cowardly acts was the initial king hit and seaton players punching and kicking lutheran players while on the ground, mainly skinny young players. They also offered to take it to the car park, how thoughtful. Sounds like the big broom needs to go through this team to rid the club of players of this sort of violent behaviour. 5 seaton red cards to 2 paints a more realistic picture!! Apparently the umpires lost total control and seaton club officials did nothing to come in and prevent any of this violence from continuing. Very poor form
I have told him that it will not last on here for long, that is if anyone sees it?
Not to mention getting me some weeks
This story is not entirely true and while i agree that the seaton fc played their part in what took place this post is far from what actually happened. I think you will find that there were 3 red cards given 2 seaton players and 1 lutheran player. I saw our player last night and he is booked in for surgery this morning to have 5 plates inserted into his face to repair his smashed cheekbone. We can argue who was to blame to the cows come home but in my opinion if you are a registered fighter and you king hit someone from behind and cause the injuries that were sustained you should expect a long long holiday from the game. I do take exception at the statement that seaton officials did nothing to prevent this from continuing as officials did every thing in their power to separate the teams and take the necessary action to make sure the injured players received the medical attention they required. This behaviour should never be tolerated on a football field and It is certainly not something that the Seaton football club condones and internally our committee met last night and I know our players will dealt with to make sure it never happens again.
by Yank Man » Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:00 pm
Newman wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:You're right Newman, this could go on til the cows come home, everyone's had their chance to have their say now so let's move on and talk footy and let the powers that be determine their findings.
Could not agree more
by red strip roo » Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:12 pm
by kickinit » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:06 pm
red strip roo wrote:Once again don't shoot the messenger !
My mate can't get on here yet, but here it is..
My Salisbury source says the only king hit from behind that took place was the initial blow to the Lutheran player where some bloke ran from some distance to do it. No Seaton player copped one from nowhere or from behind, lets get that straight.... The only Seaton players that copped any treatment were ones that were dishing it out and got it back. Like the old saying goes "If you arent willing to cop it, dont dish it out" would be the best advice. 2 Seaton players got red cards first, didnt leave the field and kept swinging at young innocent people, what do you do??? Let them smack the whole team out and say thanks very much?? A lot of people tried to break it up but it wasnt safe and there were too many people in there throwing haymakers. If you are going to be a hero and belt someone, pick a fight and a person happens to be a boxer well thats just bad luck and stupidity isnt it really. You should be playing footy yeah?? Lesson learnt right there, PERIOD. Stick to playing the ball and not the man for 4 quarters, nobody gets hurt and you don't have scenarios like this ever happening again. Agreed lets move on back to real football......
by mickey » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:19 pm
red strip roo wrote:Once again don't shoot the messenger !
My mate can't get on here yet, but here it is..
My Salisbury source says the only king hit from behind that took place was the initial blow to the Lutheran player where some bloke ran from some distance to do it. No Seaton player copped one from nowhere or from behind, lets get that straight.... The only Seaton players that copped any treatment were ones that were dishing it out and got it back. Like the old saying goes "If you arent willing to cop it, dont dish it out" would be the best advice. 2 Seaton players got red cards first, didnt leave the field and kept swinging at young innocent people, what do you do??? Let them smack the whole team out and say thanks very much?? A lot of people tried to break it up but it wasnt safe and there were too many people in there throwing haymakers. If you are going to be a hero and belt someone, pick a fight and a person happens to be a boxer well thats just bad luck and stupidity isnt it really. You should be playing footy yeah?? Lesson learnt right there, PERIOD. Stick to playing the ball and not the man for 4 quarters, nobody gets hurt and you don't have scenarios like this ever happening again. Agreed lets move on back to real football......
by Gatt_Weasel » Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:01 am
by NO-MERCY » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:17 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:48 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:54 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:I always find the comics section of the Sunday Mail to be the best read
The Real Estate section was always good for the BBQ but they've moved that to Saturday now
by story of my life » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:01 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I always find the comics section of the Sunday Mail to be the best read
The Real Estate section was always good for the BBQ but they've moved that to Saturday now
Possum pages.
Q: Why was 6 so upset?
A: Because 7 ate 9.
by red strip roo » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:42 pm
mickey wrote:red strip roo wrote:Once again don't shoot the messenger !
My mate can't get on here yet, but here it is..
My Salisbury source says the only king hit from behind that took place was the initial blow to the Lutheran player where some bloke ran from some distance to do it. No Seaton player copped one from nowhere or from behind, lets get that straight.... The only Seaton players that copped any treatment were ones that were dishing it out and got it back. Like the old saying goes "If you arent willing to cop it, dont dish it out" would be the best advice. 2 Seaton players got red cards first, didnt leave the field and kept swinging at young innocent people, what do you do??? Let them smack the whole team out and say thanks very much?? A lot of people tried to break it up but it wasnt safe and there were too many people in there throwing haymakers. If you are going to be a hero and belt someone, pick a fight and a person happens to be a boxer well thats just bad luck and stupidity isnt it really. You should be playing footy yeah?? Lesson learnt right there, PERIOD. Stick to playing the ball and not the man for 4 quarters, nobody gets hurt and you don't have scenarios like this ever happening again. Agreed lets move on back to real football......
Nothing like passing on 2nd hand info from a nameless source... Especially factually incorrect info. Not saying that seaton are 100% innocent but Lutheran aren't the good little angels your source is making them out to be.
by Gatt_Weasel » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:43 pm
by the big cheese » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:48 am
story of my life wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I always find the comics section of the Sunday Mail to be the best read
The Real Estate section was always good for the BBQ but they've moved that to Saturday now
Possum pages.
Q: Why was 6 so upset?
A: Because 7 ate 9.
Can see the headline now, Bizarre love triangle of the cannibal killers
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:28 am
the big cheese wrote:
i feell a bit sorry for no.9... had no chance with the numbers agaisnt him
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:45 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:the big cheese wrote:
i feell a bit sorry for no.9... had no chance with the numbers agaisnt him
So did 6.
by Outsider » Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:50 pm
by S Demon » Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:28 pm
Outsider wrote:Any comments about the games on the weekend?
Good to see Seaton not let any of last weeks bad press get to them and portland after a slow start are in the hunt for the top 5. Pretty close comp apart from top and bottom. Will anyone knock off Unley this year??
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |