Jabber wrote:marbles wrote:Assault on the street get how many years jail assault on footy field gets 1 match suspension
Assault on the street gets a slap on the wrist and off you go to do it again, doesn't it?
Correct, minor fine, no conviction.
by Phantom Gossiper » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:22 am
Jabber wrote:marbles wrote:Assault on the street get how many years jail assault on footy field gets 1 match suspension
Assault on the street gets a slap on the wrist and off you go to do it again, doesn't it?
by kickinit » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:27 am
by Executive Member » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:30 am
kickinit wrote:I'm sure the SAAFL is hoping it doesn't have to deal with this at all and really they shouldn't have to deal with it. Yes it may take time and money away from the SAAFL but who do we blame for that. The only reason why this is happening is because of clubs and players, if it wasn't happening then they wouldn't of had to do this.
by old farmer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:56 am
by old farmer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:57 am
morell wrote:So which 4 clubs?
by Gavin roo » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:10 pm
by heater31 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:27 pm
Gavin roo wrote:From where I see it, the clubs would only be punished if time and time again their players are at the tribunal for reckless incidents. I think we all know that it is possible to stamp out this sort of behaviour at club level.
We are not talking about one idiot who breaks someones jaw in his first game. Unfortunately, it is impossible to predict and prevent incidents like this.
Clubs cannot be held responsible for the acts of individuals but they can and should be held responsible for creating a culture that encourages fair play and punishes those who do not abide.
If a club is not actively working to encourage fairness and accountability then I see no problem with the SAAFL punishing them.
by morell » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:45 pm
So I know when to advise our guys when to wear their mouth guards.old farmer wrote:morell wrote:So which 4 clubs?
Why do you want to know, not your problem or business. OR is it????
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:05 pm
bar20 wrote: What happens if you get a new bloke off the street come and train with you, nobody knows him from a bar of soap then he decides he'll play so you chuck him in your C's or D's and he has a blackout during the game and does something stupid. Is it fair your higher grades cops the penalty for that when this bloke may only play 1 game for your club ever and has no affiliation with anyone? Serious question because it's a scenario which is very likely to happen.
by Executive Member » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:16 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:bar20 wrote: What happens if you get a new bloke off the street come and train with you, nobody knows him from a bar of soap then he decides he'll play so you chuck him in your C's or D's and he has a blackout during the game and does something stupid. Is it fair your higher grades cops the penalty for that when this bloke may only play 1 game for your club ever and has no affiliation with anyone? Serious question because it's a scenario which is very likely to happen.
A new bloke off the street comes to your front door and says he has nowhere to stay, neither your wife, 4 daughters or you know him from a bar of soap, he decides he'll stay the night so you chuck him in your spare room...................... Want me to keep going or are you getting the picture?
It's called a duty of care and, whether you like it or not, your committee people have a duty of care as much as you do at home.
My club would never let anyone in without finding out who they are.
by Cash 123 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:18 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Jabber wrote:marbles wrote:Assault on the street get how many years jail assault on footy field gets 1 match suspension
Assault on the street gets a slap on the wrist and off you go to do it again, doesn't it?
Correct, minor fine, no conviction.
by HH3 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:25 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:bar20 wrote: What happens if you get a new bloke off the street come and train with you, nobody knows him from a bar of soap then he decides he'll play so you chuck him in your C's or D's and he has a blackout during the game and does something stupid. Is it fair your higher grades cops the penalty for that when this bloke may only play 1 game for your club ever and has no affiliation with anyone? Serious question because it's a scenario which is very likely to happen.
A new bloke off the street comes to your front door and says he has nowhere to stay, neither your wife, 4 daughters or you know him from a bar of soap, he decides he'll stay the night so you chuck him in your spare room...................... Want me to keep going or are you getting the picture?
It's called a duty of care and, whether you like it or not, your committee people have a duty of care as much as you do at home.
My club would never let anyone in without finding out who they are.
by old farmer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:29 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:bar20 wrote: What happens if you get a new bloke off the street come and train with you, nobody knows him from a bar of soap then he decides he'll play so you chuck him in your C's or D's and he has a blackout during the game and does something stupid. Is it fair your higher grades cops the penalty for that when this bloke may only play 1 game for your club ever and has no affiliation with anyone? Serious question because it's a scenario which is very likely to happen.
A new bloke off the street comes to your front door and says he has nowhere to stay, neither your wife, 4 daughters or you know him from a bar of soap, he decides he'll stay the night so you chuck him in your spare room...................... Want me to keep going or are you getting the picture?
It's called a duty of care and, whether you like it or not, your committee people have a duty of care as much as you do at home.
My club would never let anyone in without finding out who they are.
by old farmer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:35 pm
morell wrote:So I know when to advise our guys when to wear their mouth guards.old farmer wrote:morell wrote:So which 4 clubs?
Why do you want to know, not your problem or business. OR is it????
Little bit tense there old farmer, perhaps Ingle Farm would be on that list?
by Old Dog New Tricks » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:36 pm
Isn't that the issue?, getting clubs to identify the dickheads and either get them to pull their heads in or p155 them off.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Some people will always be dickheads, why punish the club as a whole? Why not punish the individual?
by Phantom Gossiper » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:47 pm
Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Isn't that the issue?, getting clubs to identify the dickheads and either get them to pull their heads in or p155 them off.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Some people will always be dickheads, why punish the club as a whole? Why not punish the individual?
by Old Dog New Tricks » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:30 pm
Are you telling me or those on this forum that you couldn't guess who might fly off the radar tomorrow with a punch to someones head or similar.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Isn't that the issue?, getting clubs to identify the dickheads and either get them to pull their heads in or p155 them off.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Some people will always be dickheads, why punish the club as a whole? Why not punish the individual?
Is it? How can you identify a person character before an incident? What sort of processes do they expect to put in place to find these dickheads? Are we as clubs expected to make a prospective player jump through hoops and run them through a million tests to find out if they are worthy to pull on a jumper and have a kick?!![]()
The SAAFL want to look like they are doing something here, but the bottom line is most clubs deal swiftly with trouble makers these days anyway, so the league then jumping on the clubs back after the fact is a stupid waste of time.
You will never be able to 100% get rid of all trouble makers.
I swear sometimes I think the league just sit back reading the forums to work out how they can best inject themselves.
by old farmer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:52 pm
morell wrote:Jeez, I know its been a tough year for you blokes old farmer but perhaps settle down and have a cup of tea to relax. Or kick the dog. Maybe some alone time? Are you still bitter about the 2002 GF? Not sure but you're wound up like a plastic watch.
MP do have a great record thanks. Our thuggish reputation is now extremely outdated and pretty much completely unfounded. Have a look at the stats, we are in the middle of the road if not in the lower quadrant of clubs in terms of on field discipline issues over the last 5 years.
Plenty of others to get the auditors up in their junk before us. I was curious to know specifically who they would be.
How about we start with...
#1. Ingle Farm
#2. ....
by interested observer » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:03 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Isn't that the issue?, getting clubs to identify the dickheads and either get them to pull their heads in or p155 them off.Phantom Gossiper wrote:Some people will always be dickheads, why punish the club as a whole? Why not punish the individual?
Is it? How can you identify a person character before an incident? What sort of processes do they expect to put in place to find these dickheads? Are we as clubs expected to make a prospective player jump through hoops and run them through a million tests to find out if they are worthy to pull on a jumper and have a kick?!![]()
The SAAFL want to look like they are doing something here, but the bottom line is most clubs deal swiftly with trouble makers these days anyway, so the league then jumping on the clubs back after the fact is a stupid waste of time.
You will never be able to 100% get rid of all trouble makers.
I swear sometimes I think the league just sit back reading the forums to work out how they can best inject themselves.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |