bluestheboy wrote:Who from the PLFL did the investigating??? Maxwell Smart??
Ronald.
by Media Park » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:52 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Who from the PLFL did the investigating??? Maxwell Smart??
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:32 am
by Media Park » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:35 pm
lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:Will tasmans win easy and I should just stay home in the warmth and watch the TV
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by ironknob » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:51 pm
bluestheboy wrote:And this is where this whole messy incident gets even further murky. As a club can only refer the incident to the League, the onus is on the league to investigate the matter and determine if it is likely to be upheld at tribunal.
lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:Who do you think will win this Saturday?
I am undecided between watching the crows final or going to the local footy.Will tasmans win easy and I should just stay home in the warmth and watch the TV or will the peckers make a game of it and it be a classic.
by Media Park » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:52 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Ken Whelan Fan » Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:51 pm
by bluestheboy » Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:01 pm
FFS...how can the WFC pull a report that they did not make. The WFC requested the matter be dropped but the PLFL insisted that it had to go to tribunal. It was dropped when the commissioner asked about the evidence and the PLFL advised there was none.ironknob wrote:bluestheboy wrote:And this is where this whole messy incident gets even further murky. As a club can only refer the incident to the League, the onus is on the league to investigate the matter and determine if it is likely to be upheld at tribunal.
That may be the case however WFC e-mailed league on monday night requesting report to be dropped. If the report has been dropped then how can the league investigate.
by bluestheboy » Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:08 pm
This!!!!Racing to Win wrote:Believe that the charge against JB was dropped by the League commissioner, hopefully weather improves for the weekend.
by Racing to Win » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:17 pm
by bluestheboy » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:22 pm
Racing to Win wrote:Time to move on BTB, get to the game Saturday & support your B's.
by Ken Whelan Fan » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:36 pm
by Media Park » Thu Sep 06, 2012 8:24 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Racing to Win wrote:Time to move on BTB, get to the game Saturday & support your B's.
Don't forget the 17's...although apparently wont get within 20 goals of the favs
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by coyote ugly » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:48 pm
by the star » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:02 pm
coyote ugly wrote:Tasmans have a lot more depth than mallee park and you would think this would be exposed at some stage during the day. Roosters easy by 30 points.
I have heard that the roosters have a sqaud of 35 qaulity footballers on the track at present. We may have to look at splitting tasmans up into tasmans 1 and tasmans 2 in the future if this continues.
by coyote ugly » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:04 pm
by Media Park » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:08 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Ken Whelan Fan » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:10 am
by captian cook » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:51 am
by tangles2k9 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:01 pm
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Any truth to the story that Port Adelaide wrote a letter to the league and stated
that Byron actually lives in Port Lincoln but works for them part time in Adelaide.
If so just another reason to dislike the b@rstards..
As For Mallees they have an exceptional side
However there are a couple I wouldnt have in my side and that has nothing to do with
talent
by Justquietly » Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:29 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |