by CENTURION » Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:31 am
by Big Phil » Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:40 am
by on the rails » Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:29 am
by UK Fan » Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:35 am
Big Phil wrote:How was the President's Luncheon, gentleman?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:38 am
UK Fan wrote:Big Phil wrote:How was the President's Luncheon, gentleman?
Better than the footy. I know doggies don't want to get injuries but that's no excuse for playing "bruise free" footy like we did last night. Terrible performance!!
by on the rails » Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:39 am
UK Fan wrote:Big Phil wrote:How was the President's Luncheon, gentleman?
Better than the footy. I know doggies don't want to get injuries but that's no excuse for playing "bruise free" footy like we did last night. Terrible performance!!
by Gravel » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:01 am
by on the rails » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:04 am
Gravel wrote:How can Jimmy Allan have 33 disposals and 4 clearanced but not be in the best 7 players for North in the match review in the Sunday Mail/Adelaide Now? Did the disposals go straight to Central players, or is Warren Partland continuing his unprofessional bias against Jimmy?
by Agile » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:45 am
on the rails wrote:Gravel wrote:How can Jimmy Allan have 33 disposals and 4 clearanced but not be in the best 7 players for North in the match review in the Sunday Mail/Adelaide Now? Did the disposals go straight to Central players, or is Warren Partland continuing his unprofessional bias against Jimmy?
I often wonder how some of the journos come up with their best palyers list? Earlier in the season when we beat Glenelg at home, Clinch won the BOG as voted by the coaches yet couldn't make the 'Tiser / Mail list of our 10 best!
by on the rails » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:48 am
by topsywaldron » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:49 am
by Agile » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:56 am
topsywaldron wrote:Did the Dogs really run through North's huddle after half time as the paper indicated today?
by Ian » Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:39 pm
True, I still think the Eagles match up better against us than any other team in finals contentionon the rails wrote:It doesn't matter who we play - if our mindset is right from the start then we can beat anyone!
by CedeNullis » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:09 pm
on the rails wrote:It doesn't matter who we play - if our mindset is right from the start then we can beat anyone!
by Dog_ger » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:13 pm
by CedeNullis » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:16 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Did the Dogs really run through North's huddle after half time as the paper indicated today?
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:17 pm
on the rails wrote:It doesn't matter who we play - if our mindset is right from the start then we can beat anyone!
by on the rails » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:18 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:23 pm
on the rails wrote:Trouble is North look good every second week on average so we are due for a shocker!
by Apachebulldog » Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:44 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |