mirror#3 wrote:Well 2 of the top sides played with 7 (Shoes) and 8 (Bombers) points this year so most of these points would go down for next year.... It would be interesting to see how many points Valley's played with.... Does all the Eagleton's come at no points for being Jnrs of the club???? This would only leave Peterson-Grey as the main recruit. So I believe they would have room as well.
Anyway this would leave room for new recruits for the tops sides and should leave plenty of room for new recruits for the bottom sides which is what we want for the bottom sides.
We need to bottom side to have the advantage to make this comp a much more competitive one so everyone can stop whinging about the 2 Divs... The SFL need to try something....
I agree in some respects, such as you need to allow the bottom sides to recruit more heavily, therefore more points should be given, however some room should be left for the top sides to be able to recruit as well, maybe 1 to 2 players, yet bottom sides have room for about 4 to 5 players. Given as you have mentioned, shoes & HV, brighton points should decrease this should be ok, however that is counting heavy on all players staying, if 1 or 2 leave, you are back were you started.
I think the goal for SFL is to have a better 'brand'. This will enable clubs to attract more consistantly better players, such as ex AFL, SANFL, regardless of if there is 1 divison or 2 divisons. If the branding is sh!t, it will always be hard to attract those type of players.